Results for 'Difference'

961 found
Order:
  1. S0388-o001 (96) 00037-X.Differing Perceptions Of Face, Mk Hiraga & Jm Turner - 1996 - In Katarzyna Jaszczolt & Ken Turner, Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Tarrytown, N.Y., U.S.A.: Pergamon Press. pp. 605-627.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. John Kilcullen.How Do They Differ - 2010 - In Virpi Mäkinen, The nature of rights: moral and political aspects of rights in late medieval and early modern philosophy. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  17
    Social Difference as a Political Resource.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - In Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
    Critics of a politics of difference have misidentified these social movements as asserting an identity politics of recognition. Most of these movements are better understood as resisting unjust structural inequalities. Inclusive democratic process involves paying specific attention to group differences in order to transform preferences and maximize social knowledge.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   237 citations  
  4. Deaf People A Different Center Carol Padden and Tom Humphries.A. Different Center - 1997 - In Lennard J. Davis, The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press. pp. 331.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. The Ethics of Civic Journalism: Independence As me Guide.Doing Journalism Differently - 1997 - In Jay Black, Mixed news: the public/civic/communitarian journalism debate. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Difference-Making Causation.Holger Andreas & Mario Günther - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (12):680-701.
    We put forth an analysis of causation. The analysis centers on the notion of a causal model that provides only partial information as to which events occur, but complete information about the dependences between the events. The basic idea is this: an event causes another just in case there is a causal model that is uninformative on both events and in which the first event makes a difference as to the occurrence of the other. We show that our analysis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  77
    Boolean Difference-Making: A Modern Regularity Theory of Causation.Michael Baumgartner & Christoph Falk - unknown - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axz047.
    A regularity theory of causation analyses type-level causation in terms of Boolean difference-making. The essential ingredient that helps this theoretical framework overcome the problems of Hume’s and Mill’s classical accounts is a principle of non-redundancy: only Boolean dependency structures from which no elements can be eliminated track causation. The first part of this paper argues that the recent regularity theoretic literature has not consistently implemented this principle, for it disregarded an important type of redundancies: structural redundancies. Moreover, it is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  8. Difference-Making, Closure and Exclusion.Brad Weslake - 2017 - In Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Huw Price, Making a Difference: Essays on the Philosophy of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 215-231.
    Consider the following causal exclusion principle: For all distinct properties F and F* such that F* supervenes on F, F and F* do not both cause a property G. Peter Menzies and Christian List have proven that it follows from a natural conception of causation as difference-making that this exclusion principle is not generally true. Rather, it turns out that whether the principle is true is a contingent matter. In addition, they have shown that in a wide range of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  9. Difference-making grounds.Stephan Krämer & Stefan Peter Https://Orcidorg Roski - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (5):1191-1215.
    We define a notion of difference-making for partial grounds of a fact in rough analogy to existing notions of difference-making for causes of an event. Using orthodox assumptions about ground, we show that it induces a non-trivial division with examples of partial grounds on both sides. We then demonstrate the theoretical fruitfulness of the notion by applying it to the analysis of a certain kind of putative counter-example to the transitivity of ground recently described by Jonathan Schaffer. First, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  10.  46
    Ontological difference, anthropological difference, and equal liberty.Étienne Balibar - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):3-14.
    European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  32
    Disciplines, difference, and representational authority: Making Moves Through Inclusionary Practices.Voronka Jijian - 2016 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 23 (3):211-214.
    Pattadath and Rose, in their thoughtful responses, create room for textual dialogue by making connections and thinking about madness, lived experience, and research and knowledge production in other contexts. I am grateful for this engagement, and the opportunity to clarify my own thoughts, as well as generate new ones.Rose makes crucial points about the relative silence in many critical fields outside of Disability and Mad Studies and their “probably unknowing refusal to see madness as political”. This is often the case, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12. Difference and Disciplinarity.Robyn Wiegman - 2002 - In Emory Elliott, Louis Freitas Caton & Jeffrey Rhyne, Aesthetics in a multicultural age. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 135--56.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  13
    Scientific Conceptualization and Ontological Difference.Dimitri Ginev - 2019 - De Gruyter.
    Ginev works out a conception of the constitution of scientific objects in terms of hermeneutic phenomenology. Recently there has been a revival of interest in hermeneutic theories of scientific inquiry. The present study is furthering this interest by shifting the focus from interpretive methods and procedures to the kinds of reflexivity operating in scientific conceptualization. According to the book's central thesis, a reflexive conceptualization enables one to take into consideartion the role which the ontic-ontological difference plays in the constitution (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. Deaf People.A. Different Center - 1997 - In Lennard J. Davis, The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  59
    Signals That Make a Difference.Brett Calcott, Arnaud Pocheville & Paul Griffiths - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):233-258.
    Recent work by Brian Skyrms offers a very general way to think about how information flows and evolves in biological networks—from the way monkeys in a troop communicate to the way cells in a body coordinate their actions. A central feature of his account is a way to formally measure the quantity of information contained in the signals in these networks. In this article, we argue there is a tension between how Skyrms talks of signalling networks and his formal measure (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  16. The Difference Between Aquinas and Kant in the Approach to Human Understanding.Andres Ayala - 2020 - The Incarnate Word 7 (1):151-167.
    Kant and Aquinas: who can doubt they are different? And however, there are some who equate Aquinas and Kant in doctrines in which they are actually opposed; some attribute to St. Thomas Aquinas approaches that are Kantian and by no means Thomistic. They make those mistakes by misinterpreting or misusing Aquinas’ texts. This paper intends to clarify a little bit the radical difference between the approaches of Aquinas and Kant to human knowledge. In my view, we need first of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  24
    Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing: A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model.Caren M. Rotello, Neil A. Macmillan & John A. Reeder - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (3):588-616.
  18. The Difference-to-Inference Model for Values in Science.Jacob Stegenga & Tarun Menon - 2023 - Res Philosophica 100 (4):423-447.
    The value-free ideal for science holds that values should not influence the core features of scientific reasoning. We defend the difference-to-inference model of value-permeation, which holds that value-permeation in science is problematic when values make a difference to the inferences made about a hypothesis. This view of value-permeation is superior to existing views, and it suggests a corresponding maxim—namely, that scientists should strive to eliminate differences to inference. This maxim is the basis of a novel value-free ideal for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  41
    Wittgenstein and Hegel: Reevaluation of Difference.Jakub Mácha & Alexander Berg (eds.) - 2019 - Berlin: De Gruyter.
    This book brings together for the first time two philosophers from different traditions and different centuries. While Wittgenstein was a focal point of 20th century analytic philosophy, it was Hegel’s philosophy that brought the essential discourses of the 19th century together and developed into the continental tradition in 20th century. This now-outdated conflict took for granted Hegel’s and Wittgenstein’s opposing positions and is being replaced by a continuous progression and differentiation of several authors, schools, and philosophical traditions. The development is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  38
    Difference: ‘A Special Third World Women Issue’.Trinh T. Minh-ha - 1987 - Feminist Review 25 (1):5-22.
    It is thrilling to think – to know that for any act of mine, I shall get twice as much praise or twice as much blame. It is quite exciting to hold the center of the national stage, with the spectators not knowing whether to laugh or to weep. (Zora Neale Hurston, ‘How It Feels to Be Colored Me').
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  9
    Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion.Tsubasa Wakatsuki & Norimasa Yamada - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  9
    Incarnation, Difference, and Identity: Materialism, Self, and the Life of Spirit.Kathleen Wallace - 1997 - In Philosophy in Experience: American Philosophy in Transition. Fordham Univ Pr. pp. 47-76.
    Santayana gives a rich account of the self which is simultaneously bound by material conditions and circumstances and able to transcend those boundaries if not in material fact, at least in the life of spirit. In this essay I pursue the question, whether and how Santayana’s view of "spirit" can be reconciled with his materialism. There is a tension between two of Santayana’s claims about spirit: its inefficacy (required by his materialism) and its role in transforming human life from merely (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  11
    Difference in Plato’s Timaeus.Russell Winslow - 2021 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 42 (1):3-24.
  24.  70
    Worldly (In)Difference and Ecological Ethics: Iris Murdoch and Emmanuel Levinas.Mick Smith - 2007 - Environmental Ethics 29 (1):23-41.
    The natural world’s myriad differences from human beings, and its apparent indifference to human purposes and ends, are often regarded as problems an environmental ethics must overcome. Perhaps, though, ecological ethics might instead be re-envisaged as a form of other-directed concern that responds to just this situation. That is, the recognition of worldly (in)difference might actually be regarded as a precondition for, and opening on, any contemporary ethics, whether human or ecological. What is more, the task of ethics might (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  85
    Germinal Life: The Difference and Repetition of Deleuze.Keith Ansell-Pearson & Keith Ansell Pearson - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
    _Germinal Life_ is the sequel to the highly successful _Viroid Life_. Where _Viroid Life_ provided a compelling reading of Nietzsche's philosophy of the human, _Germinal Life_ is an original and groundbreaking analysis of little known and difficult theoretical aspects of the work of French philosopher Gilles Deleuze. In particular, Keith Ansell Pearson provides fresh and insightful readings of Deleuze's work on Bergson and Deleuze's most famous texts _Difference and Repetition_ and _A Thousand Plateaus_. _Germinal Life _also provides new insights into (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  26.  13
    Searching Probabilistic Difference-Making within Specificity.Andreas Lüchinger - 2021 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):217-235.
    The idea that good explanations come with strong changes in probabilities has been very common. This criterion is called probabilistic difference-making. Since it is an intuitive criterion and has a long tradition in the literature on scientific explanation, it comes as a surprise that probabilistic difference-making is rarely discussed in the context of interventionist causal explanation. Specificity, proportionality, and stability are usually employed to measure explanatory power instead. This paper is a first step into the larger project of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  29
    Object Discernment by “A Difference Which Makes a Difference”.Jaime F. Cárdenas-García, Diego Romero Castro & Bruno Soria de Mesa - 2018 - Biosemiotics 11 (1):27-40.
    Gregory Bateson is well known for defining information by stating “In fact what we mean by information – the elementary unit of information – is a difference which makes a difference…” This conceptual perspective has the merit of simplicity and generality. Simplicity, in addressing the complexity of information. Generality, in seeking applicability to any and every field of human experience. The purpose of this paper is to focus the applicability of this conceptual approach by Bateson and use it (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28. Mechanistic Causation: Difference-Making is Enough.Stathis Psillos & Stavros Ioannidis - 2019 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 3 (38):53-75.
    In this paper we defend the view that mechanisms are underpinned by networks of difference-making relations. First, we distinguish and criticise two different kinds of arguments in favour of an activity-based understanding of mechanism: Glennan’s metaphysics- first approach and Illari and Williamson’s science-first approach. Second, we present an alternative difference-making view of mechanism and illustrate it by looking at the history of the case of scurvy prevention. We use the case of scurvy to argue that evidence for a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29. Difference-making in context.Peter Menzies - 2004 - In John Collins, Ned Hall & Laurie Paul, Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press.
    Several different approaches to the conceptual analysis of causation are guided by the idea that a cause is something that makes a difference to its effects. These approaches seek to elucidate the concept of causation by explicating the concept of a difference-maker in terms of better-understood concepts. There is no better example of such an approach than David Lewis’ analysis of causation, in which he seeks to explain the concept of a difference-maker in counterfactual terms. Lewis introduced (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   159 citations  
  30. Difference and Robustness in the Patterns of Philosophical Intuition Across Demographic Groups.Joshua Knobe - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (2):435-455.
    In a recent paper, I argued that philosophical intuitions are surprisingly robust both across demographic groups and across development. Machery and Stich reply by reviewing a series of studies that do show significant differences in philosophical intuition between different demographic groups. This is a helpful point, which gets at precisely the issues that are most relevant here. However, even when one looks at those very studies, one finds truly surprising robustness. In other words, despite the presence of statistically significant differences (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  31.  13
    (1 other version)Reconsidering Difference: Nancy, Derrida, Levinas, Deleuze.Todd May - 1982 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
    French philosophy since World War II has been preoccupied with the issue of difference. Specifically, it has wanted to promote or to leave room for ways of living and of being that differ from those usually seen in contemporary Western society. Given the experience of the Holocaust, the motivation for such a preoccupation is not difficult to see. For some thinkers, especially Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Derrida, Emmanuel Levinas, and Gilles Deleuze, this preoccupation has led to a mode of philosophizing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  32.  77
    A Difference in Kind? Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on Post-secularism.Ulrike Spohn - 2015 - The European Legacy 20 (2):120-135.
    In this essay I examine the debate between Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on the post-secular state. I argue that, although their views on the relation of religion and politics converge in certain respects, a profound difference remains between their overall approaches. Their disagreement on the epistemic status of religious as opposed to secular moral reasons, and on the role religious arguments can play in the public sphere testify to a deeper schism. Thus what might at first seem like (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  21
    Robust intuition? Exploring the difference in the strength of intuitions from perspective of attentional bias.Yunhong Wang, Wei Bao, Edward J. N. Stupple & Junlong Luo - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (1):169-194.
    The logical intuition hypothesis proposes a difference in the strength between logical and heuristic intuitions. The labels of logical and heuristic intuitions are exclusive to conventional reasoning research. This paper reports the result of testing intuition strength using the dot-probe methodology in a novel multiplication paradigm. Here, “logical intuition” and “heuristic intuition” were relabeled as “weaker intuition” (-1 × 5 = 5) and “stronger intuition” (1 × 5 = 5), respectively, to assess the assumptions about the difference in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  27
    La différence barthésienne entre «écrivains et écrivants» et la «The Open Texture of Law» décrite par H. L. A. Hart.Michael Weinberger - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):409-419.
    This paper examines how the Barthesian difference between écrivains et écrivants can help analyse H.L.A. Hart’s Open Texture of the law. By comparing literary and judicial interpretation, one is able to better understand how lawyers, judges, and legislators can better interpret, use, and draft legislation and case law. In using concrete examples of legislation with regard to the phrase “cruel and usual”, this paper evaluates different interpretive techniques, uncovering key differences. In particular, it compares what implications the Death of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. What difference does consciousness make?Robert Van Gulick - 1989 - Philosophical Topics 17 (1):211-30.
  36. On the Difference of Buddhist Theory between Southern and Northern Dynasty and Its Evolution from Southern-Northern Dynasty to Tang Dynasty.Dan-Qiong Zhu & Lu Zhao - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):56-59.
    Consciousness-only school papers to the theoretical differences in Northern and Southern Dynasties as a special case, analysis of Chinese Buddhism from some of the theoretical differences between Northern and Southern Dynasties to the Sui and Tang dynasties of major change, this process reflects the Buddhist theory of the process of changing some of its inherent orientation choice, also shows that this choice is with the overall development of traditional Chinese culture inseparable. Based on the difference of Buddhist Weishixue theories (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  42
    Difference in Kind: Observations on the Distinction of the Megista Gene.David Ambuel - 2013 - In Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson, Plato's "Sophist" Revisited. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 247-268.
    It is argued that the analysis by which the gene are differentiated in the dialogue is an exercise in studied ambiguities informed by an Eleatic logic of strict dichotomy that was the underpinning of the Sophist's method of division. By this dialectical drill, Plato shows that the metaphysics underlying the Visitor's method fails to adequately distinguish what it means to have a character from what it means to be a character, and therefore remains inadequate to track down the sophist or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  23
    Sexual Difference in a Different Religiosity.Anirban Das - 2017 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 7 (1):23-44.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  15
    Difference-sensibility for rate of discrete impressions.Knight Dunlap - 1912 - Psychological Review 19 (1):32-59.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  74
    Relevance as difference-making: a generalized theory of relevance and its applications.Gerhard Schurz - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (9):2279-2316.
    In this paper a generalized account of relevance as difference-making is developed. It is argued that relevance should not be considered as a particular relation, but as a (higher-order) property of instances of arbitrary relations: namely the property that variations of the relata of the relation instance make a difference for its truth. This generalized account of relevance can be fruitfully applied in many domains, such as (i) logical reasoning with applications to explanation, confirmation, verisimilitude, is-ought inference, (ii) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41. Difference and givenness: Deleuze's transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence.Levi R. Bryant - 2008 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
    From one end of his philosophical work to the other, Gilles Deleuze consistently described his position as a transcendental empiricism. But just what is transcendental about Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism? And how does his position fit with the traditional empiricism articulated by Hume? In Difference and Givenness , Levi Bryant addresses these long-neglected questions so critical to an understanding of Deleuze’s thinking. Through a close examination of Deleuze’s independent work--focusing especially on Difference and Repetition-- as well as his engagement (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  42. The difference between Fichte's and Schelling's system of philosophy.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (ed.) - 1977 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Introduction to the Difference Essay. FICHTE, SCHELLING, AND HEGEL The essay on the Difference between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy was ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  43. Elemental difference : Of life, flesh, and earth in Merleau-ponty and the timaeus.Robert Vallier - 2009 - In Robert Vallier, Wayne Jeffrey Froman & Bernard Flynn, Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. State University of New York Press.
  44.  9
    Tracing Sexual Difference.Pamela Anderson - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 20:1-6.
    A reading of Luce Irigaray suggests the possibility of tracing sexual difference in philosophical accounts of personal identity. In particular, I argue that Irigaray raises the possibility of moving beyond the aporia of the other which lies at the heart of Paul Ricoeur's account of self-identity. My contention is that the self conceived in Ricoeur's Oneself as Another is male insofar as it is dependent upon the patriarchal monotheism which has shaped Western culture both socially and economically. Nevertheless there (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  25
    “All the Difference in the World”: The Nature of Difference and Different Natures.Paolo Heywood - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (6):543-564.
    This article begins by examining the status of “difference” in representations of perspectivist cosmologies, which are themselves often represented as radically different to Euro-American cosmologi...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  46.  35
    Population genetics, cybernetics of difference, and pasts in the present.Susanne Bauer - 2015 - History of the Human Sciences 28 (5):146-167.
    This article is about ‘genogeographic’ maps produced by late-Soviet geneticists and published during post-Soviet time. It focuses on the visual and numerical techniques scientists used to project genetic data onto geographic space. Rather than discussing their representational character, I follow these visuals as ‘folded objects’, describing the layering and realigning of measurements and temporalities as well as the shifts in the practices and meanings of genetics. In the 1970s Soviet biological anthropologists transformed scattered data points by means of spatial statistics (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  42
    Magnitude judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness: A two-stage analysis.Stanley J. Rule, Ronald C. Laye & Dwight W. Curtis - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1108.
  48. The Difference We Make.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (2):1-7.
    Felix Pinkert has proposed a solution to the no-difference problem for AC. He argues that AC should be supplemented with a requirement that agents’ optimal acts be modally robust. We disagree.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  49.  76
    The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation.P. Kyle Stanford - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    A range of empirical findings is first used to more precisely characterize our distinctive tendency to objectify or externalize moral demands and obligations, and it is then argued that this salient feature of our moral cognition represents a profound puzzle for evolutionary approaches to human moral psychology that existing proposals do not help resolve. It is then proposed that such externalization facilitated a broader shift to a vastly more cooperative form of social life by establishing and maintaining a connection between (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  50. Difference Unlimited.Barry Allen - 1993 - In Gary Brent Madison, Working through Derrida. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
    Derrida proposes "to restore the original and non-derivative character of signs, in opposition to classical metaphysics." One effect is "to eliminate a concept of signs whose whole history and meaning belongs to the adventure of the metaphysics of presence." The formula "nothing outside the text" registers this effect. "Nothing outside the text" does not mean "prison-house of language." Neither does it mean that everything is a sign. But to differentiate signs ontologically from something which is emphatically not itself a sign, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 961