Summary |
Immigration began to receive
attention as a major topic in applied ethics and applied social and in
political philosophy in the mid-1980s. Much of the early work concentrated on
questions surrounding states’ use of coercion to prevent people from immigrating,
especially in a world of vast inequalities between territories. The initial
debates opposed freedom of movement and freedom of opportunity against
communities’ right to self-determination, shared culture, and security.
Perhaps surprisingly, theorists of both open and closed-borders presented
interpretations of distributive justice to support their positions. As the
debate has evolved, theorists have given more attention to the obligations
towards special classes of immigrants such as refugees, temporary workers,
family-class immigrants, and undocumented residents. They have also turned
their attention to topics such as the economics of skilled migration, human
smuggling and trafficking, immigrant detention and deportation, and
sustainability. Recent work has examined the implications of racism and
sexism for migration, the moral significance of globalization and
transnationalism, and the challenges that critical scholarship on borders and
mobility poses for normative theory. |