Results for 'Human–robot Interaction'

931 found
Order:
  1.  82
    Human-robot interaction and psychoanalysis.Franco Scalzone & Guglielmo Tamburrini - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (3):297-307.
    Psychological attitudes towards service and personal robots are selectively examined from the vantage point of psychoanalysis. Significant case studies include the uncanny valley effect, brain-actuated robots evoking magic mental powers, parental attitudes towards robotic children, idealizations of robotic soldiers, persecutory fantasies involving robotic components and systems. Freudian theories of narcissism, animism, infantile complexes, ego ideal, and ideal ego are brought to bear on the interpretation of these various items. The horizons of Human-robot Interaction are found to afford new and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2. The tactile ethics of soft robotics: designing wisely for human–robot interaction.Thomas Arnold & Matthias Scheutz - 2017 - Soft Robotics 4 (2):81-87.
    Soft robots promise an exciting design trajectory in the field of robotics and human–robot interaction (HRI), promising more adaptive, resilient movement within environments as well as a safer, more sensitive interface for the objects or agents the robot encounters. In particular, tactile HRI is a critical dimension for designers to consider, especially given the onrush of assistive and companion robots into our society. In this article, we propose to surface an important set of ethical challenges for the field (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  34
    Systematic analysis of video data from different human–robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations.Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner & Manfred Tscheligi - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Human–robot interactions are often affected by error situations that are caused by either the robot or the human. Therefore, robots would profit from the ability to recognize when error situations occur. We investigated the verbal and non-verbal social signals that humans show when error situations occur in human–robot interaction experiments. For that, we analyzed 201 videos of five human–robot interaction user studies with varying tasks from four independent projects. The analysis shows that there are two (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. Comfortability Analysis under a Human-robot Interaction Perspective.M. E. L. Redondo, R. Niewiadomski, F. Rea, S. Incao, G. Sandini & A. Sciutti - 2023 - International Journal of Social Robotics 16:77-103.
    Interactions entail a tangled mix of emotional states that emerge between the people who are communicating. Being capable of comprehending these states help us to adapt to our partner’s needs enhancing the interaction. In the same fashion, we believe that robots capable of such skills would be better integrated in society. Hence, this paper tackles the internal state that focuses on the unfolding of any social exchange: Comfortability. It explores whether a humanoid robot can have an impact on humans (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  24
    Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development.Shanee Honig & Tal Oron-Gilad - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:351644.
    While substantial effort has been invested in making robots more reliable, experience demonstrates that robots operating in unstructured environments are often challenged by frequent failures. Despite this, robots have not yet reached a level of design that allows effective management of faulty or unexpected behavior by untrained users. To understand why this may be the case, an in-depth literature review was done to explore when people perceive and resolve robot failures, how robots communicate failure, how failures influence people's perceptions and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  89
    Generative AI and human–robot interaction: implications and future agenda for business, society and ethics.Bojan Obrenovic, Xiao Gu, Guoyu Wang, Danijela Godinic & Ilimdorjon Jakhongirov - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-14.
    The revolution of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, and its implications for human–robot interaction (HRI) opened up the debate on crucial regulatory, business, societal, and ethical considerations. This paper explores essential issues from the anthropomorphic perspective, examining the complex interplay between humans and AI models in societal and corporate contexts. We provided a comprehensive review of existing literature on HRI, with a special emphasis on the impact of generative models such as ChatGPT. The scientometric study posits that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  61
    Ghost-in-the-Machine reveals human social signals for human–robot interaction.Sebastian Loth, Katharina Jettka, Manuel Giuliani & Jan P. de Ruiter - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    We used a new method called “Ghost-in-the-Machine” (GiM) to investigate social interactions with a robotic bartender taking orders for drinks and serving them. Using the GiM paradigm allowed us to identify how human participants recognize the intentions of customers on the basis of the output of the robotic recognizers. Specifically, we measured which recognizer modalities (e.g., speech, the distance to the bar) were relevant at different stages of the interaction. This provided insights into human social behavior necessary for the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  25
    Recipient design in human–robot interaction: the emergent assessment of a robot’s competence.Sylvaine Tuncer, Christian Licoppe, Paul Luff & Christian Heath - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-16.
    People meeting a robot for the first time do not know what it is capable of and therefore how to interact with it—what actions to produce, and how to produce them. Despite social robotics’ long-standing interest in the effects of robots’ appearance and conduct on users, and efforts to identify factors likely to improve human–robot interaction, little attention has been paid to how participants evaluate their robotic partner in the unfolding of actual interactions. This paper draws from qualitative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  68
    Incremental learning of gestures for human–robot interaction.Shogo Okada, Yoichi Kobayashi, Satoshi Ishibashi & Toyoaki Nishida - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (2):155-168.
    For a robot to cohabit with people, it should be able to learn people’s nonverbal social behavior from experience. In this paper, we propose a novel machine learning method for recognizing gestures used in interaction and communication. Our method enables robots to learn gestures incrementally during human–robot interaction in an unsupervised manner. It allows the user to leave the number and types of gestures undefined prior to the learning. The proposed method (HB-SOINN) is based on a self-organizing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  18
    Towards a Questions-Centered Approach to Explainable Human-Robot Interaction.Glenda Hannibal & Felix Lindner - 2023 - In Raul Hakli, Pekka Mäkelä & Johanna Seibt (eds.), Social Robots in Social Institutions - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022. IOS Press. pp. 406-415.
    To address the tension between demands for more transparent AI systems and the aim to develop and design robots with apparent agency for smooth and intuitive human-robot interaction (HRI), we present in this paper an argument for why explainability in HRI would benefit from being question-centered. First, we review how explainability has been discussed in AI and HRI respectively, to then present the challenge in HRI to accommodate the requirement of transparency while also keeping up the appearance of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  29
    A critical analysis of the representations of older adults in the field of human–robot interaction.Dafna Burema - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):455-465.
    This paper argues that there is a need to critically assess bias in the representations of older adults in the field of Human–Robot Interaction. This need stems from the recognition that technology development is a socially constructed process that has the potential to reinforce problematic understandings of older adults. Based on a qualitative content analysis of 96 academic publications, this paper indicates that older adults are represented as; frail by default, independent by effort; silent and technologically illiterate; burdensome; (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  19
    More Than a Feeling—Interrelation of Trust Layers in Human-Robot Interaction and the Role of User Dispositions and State Anxiety.Linda Miller, Johannes Kraus, Franziska Babel & Martin Baumann - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12:592711.
    With service robots becoming more ubiquitous in social life, interaction design needs to adapt to novice users and the associated uncertainty in the first encounter with this technology in new emerging environments. Trust in robots is an essential psychological prerequisite to achieve safe and convenient cooperation between users and robots. This research focuses on psychological processes in which user dispositions and states affect trust in robots, which in turn is expected to impact the behavior and reactions in the (...) with robotic systems. In a laboratory experiment, the influence of propensity to trust in automation and negative attitudes toward robots on state anxiety, trust, and comfort distance toward a robot were explored. Participants were approached by a humanoid domestic robot two times and indicated their comfort distance and trust. The results favor the differentiation and interdependence of dispositional, initial, and dynamic learned trust layers. A mediation from the propensity to trust to initial learned trust by state anxiety provides an insight into the psychological processes through which personality traits might affect interindividual outcomes in human-robot interaction (HRI). The findings underline the meaningfulness of user characteristics as predictors for the initial approach to robots and the importance of considering users’ individual learning history regarding technology and robots in particular. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  78
    Analyzing social situations for human–robot interaction.Alan R. Wagner & Ronald C. Arkin - 2008 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 9 (2):277-300.
    This paper presents an algorithm for analyzing social situations within a robot. We contribute a method that allows the robot to use information about the situation to select interactive behaviors. This work is based on interdependence theory, a social psychological theory of interaction and interpersonal situation analysis. Experiments demonstrate the utility of the information provided by the situation analysis algorithm and of the value of this method for guiding robot interaction. We conclude that the situation analysis algorithm offers (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  16
    The Role of Frustration in Human–Robot Interaction – What Is Needed for a Successful Collaboration?Alexandra Weidemann & Nele Rußwinkel - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12:640186.
    To realize a successful and collaborative interaction between human and robots remains a big challenge. Emotional reactions of the user provide crucial information for a successful interaction. These reactions carry key factors to prevent errors and fatal bidirectional misunderstanding. In cases where human–machine interaction does not proceed as expected, negative emotions, like frustration, can arise. Therefore, it is important to identify frustration in a human–machine interaction and to investigate its impact on other influencing factors such as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  35
    Robots beyond Science Fiction: mutual learning in human–robot interaction on the way to participatory approaches.Astrid Weiss & Katta Spiel - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):501-515.
    Putting laypeople in an active role as direct expert contributors in the design of service robots becomes more and more prominent in the research fields of human–robot interaction and social robotics. Currently, though, HRI is caught in a dilemma of how to create meaningful service robots for human social environments, combining expectations shaped by popular media with technology readiness. We recapitulate traditional stakeholder involvement, including two cases in which new intelligent robots were conceptualized and realized for close (...) with humans. Thereby, we show how the robot narrative together with aspects of power balancing stakeholders, such as hardware constraints and missing perspectives beyond primary users, and the adaptivity of robots through machine learning that creates unpredictability, pose specific challenges for participatory design processes in HRI. We conclude with thoughts on a way forward for the HRI community in developing a culture of participation that considers humans when conceptualizing, building, and using robots. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16. How Robots’ Unintentional Metacommunication Affects Human–Robot Interactions. A Systemic Approach.Piercosma Bisconti - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (4):487-504.
    In this paper, we theoretically address the relevance of unintentional and inconsistent interactional elements in human–robot interactions. We argue that elements failing, or poorly succeeding, to reproduce a humanlike interaction create significant consequences in human–robot relational patterns and may affect human–human relations. When considering social interactions as systems, the absence of a precise interactional element produces a general reshaping of the interactional pattern, eventually generating new types of interactional settings. As an instance of this dynamic, we study (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. What is a Human?: Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human–robot interaction.Peter H. Kahn, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Batya Friedman, Takayuki Kanda, Nathan G. Freier, Rachel L. Severson & Jessica Miller - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):363-390.
    In this paper, we move toward offering psychological benchmarks to measure success in building increasingly humanlike robots. By psychological benchmarks we mean categories of interaction that capture conceptually fundamental aspects of human life, specified abstractly enough to resist their identity as a mere psychological instrument, but capable of being translated into testable empirical propositions. Nine possible benchmarks are considered: autonomy, imitation, intrinsic moral value, moral accountability, privacy, reciprocity, conventionality, creativity, and authenticity of relation. Finally, we discuss how getting the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  18.  14
    Commitments in Human-Robot Interaction.Víctor Fernandez Castro, Aurélie Clodic, Rachid Alami & Elisabeth Pacherie - 2019 - AI-HRI 2019 Proceedings.
    An important tradition in philosophy holds that in order to successfully perform a joint action, the participants must be capable of establishing commitments on joint goals and shared plans. This suggests that social robotics should endow robots with similar competences for commitment management in order to achieve the objective of performing joint tasks in human-robot interactions. In this paper, we examine two philosophical approaches to commitments. These approaches, we argue, emphasize different behavioral and cognitive aspects of commitments that give roboticists (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  17
    Robotics in place and the places of robotics: productive tensions across human geography and human–robot interaction.Casey R. Lynch, Bethany N. Manalo & Àlex Muñoz-Viso - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-14.
    Bringing human–robot interaction (HRI) into conversation with scholarship from human geography, this paper considers how socially interactive robots become important agents in the production of social space and explores the utility of core geographic concepts of _scale_ and _place_ to critically examine evolving robotic spatialities. The paper grounds this discussion through reflections on a collaborative, interdisciplinary research project studying the development and deployment of interactive museum tour-guiding robots on a North American university campus. The project is a collaboration (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction.Jakub Zlotowski, Diane Proudfoot, Kumar Yogeeswaran & Christoph Bartneck - 2015 - International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (3):347-360.
    Anthropomorphism is a phenomenon that describes the human tendency to see human-like shapes in the environment. It has considerable consequences for people’s choices and beliefs. With the increased presence of robots, it is important to investigate the optimal design for this tech- nology. In this paper we discuss the potential benefits and challenges of building anthropomorphic robots, from both a philosophical perspective and from the viewpoint of empir- ical research in the fields of human–robot interaction and social psychology. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  21.  25
    The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction.Marcell Székely, Henry Powell, Fabio Vannucci, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti & John Michael - 2019 - Interaction Studies 20 (2):234-255.
    Previous research has shown that the perception that one’s partner is investing effort in a joint action can generate a sense of commitment, leading participants to persist longer despite increasing boredom. The current research extends this finding to human-robot interaction. We implemented a 2-player version of the classic snake game which became increasingly boring over the course of each round, and operationalized commitment in terms of how long participants persisted before pressing a ‘finish’ button to conclude each round. Participants (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  31
    (1 other version)Reshaping human intention in Human-Robot Interactions by robot moves.Akif Durdu, Aydan M. Erkmen & Alper Yilmaz - 2019 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 20 (3):530-560.
    This paper outlines the methodology and experiments associated with the reshaping of human intentions based on robot movements within Human-Robot Interactions. Although studies on estimating human intentions are well studied in the literature, reshaping intentions through robot-initiated interactions is a new significant branching in the field of HRI. In this paper, we analyze how estimated human intentions can intentionally change through cooperation with mobile robots in real Human-Robot environments. This paper proposes an intention-reshaping system that includes either the Observable Operator (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction.Tatsuya Nomura, Takayuki Kanda & Tomohiro Suzuki - 2006 - AI and Society 20 (2):138-150.
    Negative attitudes toward robots are considered as one of the psychological factors preventing humans from interacting with robots in the daily life. To verify their influence on humans‘ behaviors toward robots, we designed and executed experiments where subjects interacted with Robovie, which is being developed as a platform for research on the possibility of communication robots. This paper reports and discusses the results of these experiments on correlation between subjects’ negative attitudes and their behaviors toward robots. Moreover, it discusses influences (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  24.  22
    You Look Human, But Act Like a Machine: Agent Appearance and Behavior Modulate Different Aspects of Human–Robot Interaction.Abdulaziz Abubshait & Eva Wiese - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:277299.
    Gaze following occurs automatically in social interactions, but the degree to which gaze is followed depends on whether an agent is perceived to have a mind, making its behavior socially more relevant for the interaction. Mind perception also modulates the attitudes we have towards others, and deter-mines the degree of empathy, prosociality and morality invested in social interactions. Seeing mind in others is not exclusive to human agents, but mind can also be ascribed to nonhuman agents like robots, as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  25.  57
    Anthropomorphism in social robotics: empirical results on human–robot interaction in hybrid production workplaces.Anja Richert, Sarah Müller, Stefan Schröder & Sabina Jeschke - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):413-424.
    New forms of artificial intelligence on the one hand and the ubiquitous networking of “everything with everything” on the other hand characterize the fourth industrial revolution. This results in a changed understanding of human–machine interaction, in new models for production, in which man and machine together with virtual agents form hybrid teams. The empirical study “Socializing with robots” aims to gain insight especially into conditions of development and processes of hybrid human–machine teams. In the experiment, human–robot actions and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26. (1 other version)Mutual Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: a Deflationary Account.Ingar Brinck & Christian Balkenius - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 1 (1):53-70.
    Mutually adaptive interaction involves the robot as a partner as opposed to a tool, and requires that the robot is susceptible to similar environmental cues and behavior patterns as humans are. Recognition, or the acknowledgement of the other as individual, is fundamental to mutually adaptive interaction between humans. We discuss what recognition involves and its behavioral manifestations, and describe the benefits of implementing it in HRI.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  27.  27
    New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction.Maha Salem, Astrid Weiss & Paul Baxter - 2016 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 17 (3):405-407.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  72
    Helpless machines and true loving care givers: a feminist critique of recent trends in human‐robot interaction.Jutta Weber - 2005 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 3 (4):209-218.
    In recent developments in Artificial Intelligence and especially in robotics we can observe a tendency towards building intelligent artefacts that are meant to be social, to have ‘human social’ characteristics like emotions, the ability to conduct dialogue, to learn, to develop personality, character traits, and social competencies. Care, entertainment, pet and educational robots are conceptualised as friendly, understanding partners and credible assistants which communicate ‘naturally’ with users, show emotions and support them in everyday life. Social robots are often designed to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  29.  61
    Should my robot know what's best for me? Human–robot interaction between user experience and ethical design.Nora Fronemann, Kathrin Pollmann & Wulf Loh - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):517-533.
    To integrate social robots in real-life contexts, it is crucial that they are accepted by the users. Acceptance is not only related to the functionality of the robot but also strongly depends on how the user experiences the interaction. Established design principles from usability and user experience research can be applied to the realm of human–robot interaction, to design robot behavior for the comfort and well-being of the user. Focusing the design on these aspects alone, however, comes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30. Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human–Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults.Wendy A. Rogers, Travis Kadylak & Megan A. Bayles - 2021 - Human Factors 64 (3):441–450.
    Objective We reviewed human–robot interaction (HRI) participatory design (PD) research with older adults. The goal was to identify methods used, determine their value for design of robots with older adults, and provide guidance for best practices. Background Assistive robots may promote aging-in-place and quality of life for older adults. However, the robots must be designed to meet older adults’ specific needs and preferences. PD and other user-centered methods may be used to engage older adults in the robot development (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  25
    An Exploratory Analysis of the Neural Correlates of Human-Robot Interactions With Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.Emre Yorgancigil, Funda Yildirim, Burcu A. Urgen & Sinem Burcu Erdogan - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16.
    Functional near infrared spectroscopy has been gaining increasing interest as a practical mobile functional brain imaging technology for understanding the neural correlates of social cognition and emotional processing in the human prefrontal cortex. Considering the cognitive complexity of human-robot interactions, the aim of this study was to explore the neural correlates of emotional processing of congruent and incongruent pairs of human and robot audio-visual stimuli in the human PFC with fNIRS methodology. Hemodynamic responses from the PFC region of 29 subjects (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  24
    (1 other version)On the impact of different types of errors on trust in human-robot interaction.Rebecca Flook, Anas Shrinah, Luc Wijnen, Kerstin Eder, Chris Melhuish & Séverin Lemaignan - 2019 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 20 (3):455-486.
    Trust is a key dimension of human-robot interaction, and has often been studied in the HRI community. A common challenge arises from the difficulty of assessing trust levels in ecologically invalid environments: we present in this paper two independent laboratory studies, totalling 160 participants, where we investigate the impact of different types of errors on resulting trust, using both behavioural and subjective measures of trust. While we found a general effect of errors on reported and observed level of trust, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  23
    Artificial cognition for social human–robot interaction: An implementation.Séverin Lemaignan, Mathieu Warnier, E. Akin Sisbot, Aurélie Clodic & Rachid Alami - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence 247:45-69.
  34.  25
    Multi-modal referring expressions in human-human task descriptions and their implications for human-robot interaction.Stephanie Gross, Brigitte Krenn & Matthias Scheutz - 2016 - Interaction Studies 17 (2):180-210.
    Human instructors often refer to objects and actions involved in a task description using both linguistic and non-linguistic means of communication. Hence, for robots to engage in natural human-robot interactions, we need to better understand the various relevant aspects of human multi-modal task descriptions. We analyse reference resolution to objects in a data collection comprising two object manipulation tasks and find that 78.76% of all referring expressions to the objects relevant in Task 1 are verbally underspecified and 88.64% of all (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Companion robots: the hallucinatory danger of human-robot interactions.Piercosma Bisconti & Daniele Nardi - 2018 - In Piercosma Bisconti & Daniele Nardi (eds.), AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. pp. 17-22.
    The advent of the so-called Companion Robots is raising many ethical concerns among scholars and in the public opinion. Focusing mainly on robots caring for the elderly, in this paper we analyze these concerns to distinguish which are directly ascribable to robotic, and which are instead preexistent. One of these is the “deception objection”, namely the ethical unacceptability of deceiving the user about the simulated nature of the robot’s behaviors. We argue on the inconsistency of this charge, as today formulated. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  37
    Drones in humanitarian contexts, robot ethics, and the human–robot interaction.Aimee van Wynsberghe & Tina Comes - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1):43-53.
    There are two dominant trends in the humanitarian care of 2019: the ‘technologizing of care’ and the centrality of the humanitarian principles. The concern, however, is that these two trends may conflict with one another. Faced with the growing use of drones in the humanitarian space there is need for ethical reflection to understand if this technology undermines humanitarian care. In the humanitarian space, few agree over the value of drone deployment; one school of thought believes drones can provide a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37. Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry.António Moniz & Bettina-Johanna Krings - 2016 - Societies 2016 (23).
    The focus of the following article is on the use of new robotic systems in the manufacturing industry with respect to the social dimension. Since “intuitive” human–machine interaction (HMI) in robotic systems becomes a significant objective of technical progress, new models of work organization are needed. This hypothesis will be investigated through the following two aims: The first aim is to identify relevant research questions related to the potential use of robotic systems in different systems of work organization at (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  38.  60
    Learning robots interacting with humans: from epistemic risk to responsibility. [REVIEW]Matteo Santoro, Dante Marino & Guglielmo Tamburrini - 2008 - AI and Society 22 (3):301-314.
    The import of computational learning theories and techniques on the ethics of human-robot interaction is explored in the context of recent developments of personal robotics. An epistemological reflection enables one to isolate a variety of background hypotheses that are needed to achieve successful learning from experience in autonomous personal robots. The conjectural character of these background hypotheses brings out theoretical and practical limitations in our ability to predict and control the behaviour of learning robots in their interactions with humans. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  39.  23
    Trait attribution explains human–robot interactions.Yochanan E. Bigman, Nicholas Surdel & Melissa J. Ferguson - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e23.
    Clark and Fischer (C&F) claim that trait attribution has major limitations in explaining human–robot interactions. We argue that the trait attribution approach can explain the three issues posited by C&F. We also argue that the trait attribution approach is parsimonious, as it assumes that the same mechanisms of social cognition apply to human–robot interaction.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  28
    Investigating joint attention mechanisms through spoken human–robot interaction.Maria Staudte & Matthew W. Crocker - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):268-291.
  41. Robots, Rebukes, and Relationships: Confucian Ethics and the Study of Human-Robot Interactions.Alexis Elder - 2023 - Res Philosophica 100 (1):43-62.
    The status and functioning of shame is contested in moral psychology. In much of anglophone philosophy and psychology, it is presumed to be largely destructive, while in Confucian philosophy and many East Asian communities, it is positively associated with moral development. Recent work in human-robot interaction offers a unique opportunity to investigate how shame functions while controlling for confounding variables of interpersonal interaction. One research program suggests a Confucian strategy for using robots to rebuke participants, but results from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  11
    Robots among us: ordinary but significant human–robot interactions in the city.Jeffrey Kok Hui Chan & Yixiao Wang - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-2.
  43.  28
    A possibility of inappropriate use of gender studies in human-robot Interaction.Tatsuya Nomura - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (3):751-754.
  44.  16
    Perceived robot personality affects social attention in real-time human-robot interaction.Ali Momen & Eva Wiese - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
  45.  20
    Mind perception modulates social attention in real-time human-robot interaction.Ali Momen & Eva Wiese - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
  46. Predicting the Long-Term Effects of Human-Robot Interaction: A Reflection on Responsibility in Medical Robotics. [REVIEW]Edoardo Datteri - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):139-160.
    This article addresses prospective and retrospective responsibility issues connected with medical robotics. It will be suggested that extant conceptual and legal frameworks are sufficient to address and properly settle most retrospective responsibility problems arising in connection with injuries caused by robot behaviours (which will be exemplified here by reference to harms occurred in surgical interventions supported by the Da Vinci robot, reported in the scientific literature and in the press). In addition, it will be pointed out that many prospective responsibility (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47.  29
    A salience-driven approach to speech recognition for human-robot interaction.Pierre Lison - 2010 - In T. Icard & R. Muskens (eds.), Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation. Springer Berlin. pp. 102--113.
  48.  42
    A more ecological perspective on human–robot interactions.Varun Ravikumar, Jonathan Bowen & Michael L. Anderson - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e42.
    Drawing from two strands of ecological psychology, we suggest that even if social robots are interactive depictions, people need not mentally represent them as such. Rather, people can engage with the opportunities for action or affordances that social robots offer to them. These affordances are constrained by the larger sociocultural settings within which human–robot interactions occur.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  24
    What do we think we are doing: principles of coupled self-regulation in human-robot interaction.Idit Shalev & Tal Oron-Gilad - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  13
    Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human–Robot Interaction – A Model for Research on ad hoc Task Allocation.Alina Tausch, Annette Kluge & Lars Adolph - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 931