Results for 'Consensus Interruptus'

971 found
Order:
  1.  63
    Consensus interruptus.Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (2):121-131.
    If all reasonable people of goodwill and patience will eventually reachconsensus, then anyone who fails to join inthat consensus as being unreasonable or lackingin good will or patience. The ``nice''''(consensual) and ``nasty'''' (intolerant) faces ofcommunitarianism are thus joined. This articleattempts to deny communitarians that excuse forintolerance by undermining Keith Lehrer''s proofof the inevitability of rational consensusamong all patient people of good will.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  2. Ancient greek ethics.Keith Lehrer, Communitarianism Individualism, Robert E. Goodin, Consensus Interruptus, Simon Blackburn & Normativity à la Mode - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5:423-425.
  3. Karen Jones.Pro-Emotion Consensus - 2008 - In Luc Faucher & Christine Tappolet (eds.), The modularity of emotions. Calgary, Alta., Canada: University of Calgary Press. pp. 32--3.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  34
    Justice, Desert, and the Repugnant Conclusion.S. Consensus - 1995 - Utilitas 7 (2).
  5.  42
    Jus Interruptus Bellum: The Ethics of Truce-Making.Thaddeus Metz - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):6-13.
    With his new book, A Theory of Truces, Nir Eisikovits has succeed in producing the most comprehensive and insightful book to exist on the nature and morality of truces during international military conflict. In it he plausibly argues that thought about such conflict should avoid binary terms such as long-lasting peace and all-out war, and instead must readily acknowledge conditions “in between” them, such as cease-fires and agreements to limit belligerence to certain times. In this critical notice of Eisikovits’ book, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. (1 other version)Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition.Nancy Fraser - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
    What does it mean to think critically about politics at a time when inequality is increasing worldwide, when struggles for the recognition of difference are eclipsing struggles for social equality, and when we lack any credible vision of an alternative to the present order? Philosopher Nancy Fraser claims that the key is to overcome the false oppositions of "postsocialist" commonsense. Refuting the view that we must choose between "the politics of recognition" and the "politics of redistribution," Fraser argues for an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  7.  24
    Dialogic Consensus In Clinical Decision-Making.Paul Walker & Terry Lovat - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):571-580.
    This paper is predicated on the understanding that clinical encounters between clinicians and patients should be seen primarily as inter-relations among persons and, as such, are necessarily moral encounters. It aims to relocate the discussion to be had in challenging medical decision-making situations, including, for example, as the end of life comes into view, onto a more robust moral philosophical footing than is currently commonplace. In our contemporary era, those making moral decisions must be cognizant of the existence of perspectives (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  8. 'Beyond consensus? A Reply to Alan Irwin.'.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (10):48-53.
    This paper is a rejoinder to Alan Irwin's constructive response "Agreeing to Differ?" to our (2017) paper. We zoom in on the three main issues Irwin raises, namely (a) How to understand consensus? (b) Why are so many public participation activities consensus-driven? (c) Should we not value the art of closure, of finding ways to make agreements, particularly in view of the dire state of world politics today? We use this opportunity to highlight and further develop some of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  21
    Consensus of Switched Multiagent Systems under Relative State Constraints.Qingling Wang - 2017 - Complexity:1-7.
    The consensus problem is presented for the switched multiagent system, where the MAS is switched between continuous- and discrete-time systems with relative state constraints. With some standard assumptions, we obtain the fact that the switched MAS with relative state constraints can achieve consensus under both fixed undirected graphs and switching undirected graphs. Furthermore, based on the absolute average value of initial states, we propose sufficient conditions for consensus of the switched MAS. The challenge of this study is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  30
    "Amor Interruptus": The Question of Eroticism or, Eroticism in Question in the Works of Claude Simon.Claud DuVerlie - 1973 - Substance 3 (8):21.
  11. Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.
    A consensus in a scientific community is often used as a resource for making informed public-policy decisions and deciding between rival expert testimonies in legal trials. This paper contains a social-epistemic analysis of the high-profile Bendectin drug controversy, which was decided in the courtroom inter alia by deference to a scientific consensus about the safety of Bendectin. Drawing on my previously developed account of knowledge-based consensus, I argue that the consensus in this case was not knowledge (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  12.  64
    Consensus of expertise: The role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts.Robert M. Veatch - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
    For years analysts have recognized the error of assuming that experts in medical science are also experts in deciding the clinically correct course for patients. This paper extends the analysis of the use of the consensus of experts to their use in public policy groups such as NIH Consensus Development panels. After arguing that technical experts cannot be expected to be expert on public policy decisions, the author extends the criticism to the use of the consensus of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13. (1 other version)Consensus, Compromise, Justice and Legitimacy.Enzo Rossi - 2013 - Critical Review of Social and International Political Philosophy 16 (4):557-572.
    Could the notion of compromise help us overcoming – or at least negotiating – the frequent tension, in normative political theory, between the realistic desideratum of peaceful coexistence and the idealistic desideratum of justice? That is to say, an analysis of compromise may help us moving beyond the contrast between two widespread contrasting attitudes in contemporary political philosophy: ‘fiat iustitia, pereat mundus’ on the one side, ‘salus populi suprema lex’ on the other side. More specifically, compromise may provide the backbone (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  14.  26
    Consensus and Scientific Classification.Joeri Witteveen, Atriya Sen & Beckett Sterner - 2022 - Knowledge Organization 49 (4):236-256.
    Consensus about a classification is defined as agreement on a set of classes and their relations for us in forming beliefs. While most research on scientific consensus has focused on consensus about a belief as a mark of truth, we highlight the importance of consensus in justifying shared classificatory language. What sort of consensus, if any, is the best basis for communicating and reasoning with scientific classifications? We describe an often-overlooked coordinative role for consensus (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  49
    Pluralism and consensus in deliberative democracy.José Luis Martí - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (5):556-579.
    A central discussion in the theory of deliberative democracy in recent decades has focused on whether democratic deliberation, and consequently those participating in it, should aim, at least ideally, for political consensus. Thus, pluralist deliberative democrats have criticized the consensualist approach to deliberative democracy for neglecting the moral importance of political disagreement because of their fixation with reaching consensus. The debate between these two positions, initiated in the 1990s, has evolved in recent years toward more precision and sophistication. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16. Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?Finnur Dellsén - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
    Around 97% of climate scientists endorse anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that human activities are partly responsible for recent increases in global average temperatures. Clearly, this widespread endorsement of AGW is a reason for non-experts to believe in AGW. But what is the epistemic significance of the fact that some climate scientists do not endorse AGW? This paper contrasts expert unanimity, in which virtually no expert disagrees with some theory, with expert consensus, in which some non-negligible proportion either (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17. (1 other version)Justice Interruptus.R. Hennessey - 1999 - Hypatia 14:126-132.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  59
    The Consensus Gentium Argument.Loren Meierding - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):271-297.
    In antiquity the consensus gentium argument for God’s existence was believed to have merit (cf. Cicero, De Natura Deorum, Book II, sect.2,4), but has been considered blatantly fallacious during more recent times. In this article Bayes’ Theorem is applied to show that the argument is in fact a valid inductive argument. A two hypothesis and a four hypothesis version of the argument are analyzed. Perusal of available statistical evidence suggests that when better worldwide opinion polling data becomes available it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19. Unanimous Consensus Against AGM?Rush T. Stewart - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):222-231.
    Given the role consensus is supposed to play in the social aspects of inquiry and deliberation, it is important that we may always identify a consensus as the basis of joint inquiry and deliberation. However, it turns out that if we think of an agent revising her beliefs to reach a consensus, then, on the received view of belief revision, AGM belief revision theory, certain simple and compelling consensus positions are not always available.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  92
    Rational Consensus in Science and Society: A Philosophical and Mathematical Study.Keith Lehrer & Carl Wagner - 1981 - Boston: D. Reidel.
    CONSENSUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES Various atomistic and individualistic theories of knowledge, language, ethics and politics have dominated philosophical ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   142 citations  
  21.  15
    Overlapping Consensus.Rex Martin - 2013 - In Jon Mandle & David A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 281–296.
    This chapter brings overlapping consensus and its relation to constitutional consensus together, center stage. Since constitutional consensus on its own goes a considerable distance toward providing political stability, the chapter explains how overlapping consensus goes beyond constitutional consensus. What overlapping consensus supplies, which freestanding justification and constitutional consensus can't, is a distinctive set of comprehensive moral and religious reasons endorsing and thereby justifying, each for its own reasons, the liberal order. The chapter takes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Ecumenical consensus: Our quest for and the emerging structures of consensus.Harding Meyer - 1996 - Gregorianum 77 (2):213-225.
    Cherchant à définir l'évolution des relations œcuméniques entre les Eglises depuis les années soixante, l'A. trouve trois mots-clés pour en rendre compte : dialogue, réception et consensus. L'objet de cette étude est de définir une nature et un contenu à ce consensus œcuménique. L'A. attire l'attention sur ce qui serait une conception immature de cette notion et qui finirait par la fausser. Pour cela, il établit un critère de différenciation entre ce qui exige consensus et ce qui (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  55
    (1 other version)Consensus formation in networked groups.Carlo Martini - unknown
    This paper applies the theory of networks to the problem of how agents should assign weights to other agents in the Lehrer-Wagner model for consensus formation. The Lehrer- Wagner theory of consensus is introduced, and the problem of weight assignment is highlighted as one of the open prob- lems for the theory. The paper argues that the application of the theory of networks to the Lehrer-Wagner model con- stitutes an interesting and fruitful option, among others, for the problem (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24.  35
    The Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberation.Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani - 2019 - Dialogue 58 (2):299-322.
    L’argument de base de cet article est que le débat consensuel n’a pas été une notion très significative jusqu’à présent parce que le consensus n’a pas été étudié de manière approfondie en tant que concept et que la délibération n’a pas été étudiée précisément en termes de sa propension à parvenir à un accord commun. En particulier, la délibération et les problèmes qui en découlent n’ont pas été classées en plusieurs niveaux afin d’exposer les différents défis qui se posent (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25.  11
    (1 other version)Cogito Interruptus.Kyoo Lee - 2011 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 1 (2):173-194.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  13
    Bipartite Consensus of Linear Discrete-Time Multiagent Systems with Exogenous Disturbances under Competitive Networks.Yi Yuan, Shamrie Sainin Mohd & Yanhui Zhu - 2021 - Complexity 2021:1-11.
    This paper investigates the bipartite consensus of linear discrete-time multiagent systems with exogenous disturbances. A discrete-time disturbance-observer- based technology is involved for attenuating the exogenous disturbances. And both the state feedback and observer-based output feedback bipartite consensus protocols are proposed by using the DTDO method. It turned out that bipartite consensus can be realized under the given protocols if the topology is connected and structurally balanced. Finally, numerical simulations are presented to illustrate the theoretical findings.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  20
    Consensus of Second-Order Heterogeneous Hybrid Multiagent Systems via Event-Triggered Protocols.Hong Zhang, Yanhan Li & Ying Zheng - 2022 - Complexity 2022:1-16.
    This paper investigates the event-based consensus problem for the heterogeneous hybrid multiagent system. First, the heterogeneous hybrid MAS is proposed which contains continuous and discrete-time subsystems with second-order and first-order heterogeneous dynamics. Second, the event-triggered protocols are proposed, which mainly include the event-based control laws and event-triggered conditions for different kinds of agents. Then, the consensus conclusions of fixed topology and switching topologies are obtained based on graph theory and nonnegative matrix theory, which include the constraints on control (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  47
    Dialogic Consensus in Medicine—A Justification Claim.Paul Walker & Terence Lovat - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (1):71-84.
    The historical emphasis of medical ethics, based on substantive frameworks and principles derived from them, is no longer seen as sufficiently sensitive to the moral pluralism characteristic of our current era. We argue that moral decision-making in clinical situations is more properly derived from a process of dialogic consensus. This process entails an inclusive, noncoercive, and self-reflective dialogue within the community affected. In order to justify this approach, we make two claims—the first epistemic, and the second normative. The epistemic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  29.  33
    Ontology development is consensus creation, not (merely) representation.Fabian Neuhaus & Janna Hastings - 2022 - Applied ontology 17 (4):495-513.
    Ontology development methodologies emphasise knowledge gathering from domain experts and documentary resources, and knowledge representation using an ontology language such as OWL or FOL. However, working ontologists are often surprised by how challenging and slow it can be to develop ontologies. Here, with a particular emphasis on the sorts of ontologies that are content-heavy and intended to be shared across a community of users (reference ontologies), we propose that a significant and heretofore under-emphasised contributor of challenges during ontology development is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30. Democratic Consensus as an Essential Byproduct.Michael Fuerstein - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3):282-301.
    In this paper, I try to show that democratic consensus – one of the more prominent ideals in recent political thought – is an essential byproduct of epistemically warranted beliefs about political action and organization, at least in those cases where the issues under dispute are epistemic in nature. An essential byproduct (to borrow Jon Elster’s term) is a goal that can only be intentionally achieved by aiming at some other objective. In my usage, a political issue is epistemic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  31. Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus.Kenneth A. Taylor - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):45 - 61.
  32.  94
    Overlapping Consensus or Marketplace of Religions? Rawls and Smith.Jack Russell Weinstein - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):223-236.
    In this paper, I examine the claim that Rawls’s overlapping consensus is too narrow to allow most mainstream religions’ participation in political discourse. I do so by asking whether religious exclusion is a consequence of belief or action, using conversion as a paradigm case. After concluding that this objection to Rawls is, in fact, defensible, and that the overlapping consensus excludes both religious belief and action, I examine an alternative approach to managing religious pluralism as presented by Adam (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  40
    Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
    : The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments experienced some disagreements among its members in the course of its work. An epistemological controversy over the nature and degree of evidence required to draw ethical conclusions pervaded the committee's deliberations. Other disagreements involved the proper role of a governmental advisory committee and the question of when it is appropriate to notify people that they were unknowing subjects of radiation experiments. In the end, the Committee was able to reach consensus on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Consensus, unanimitas und maior pars auf Konzilien, von der Alten Kirche bis zum Ersten Vatikanum.Hermann Josef Sieben - 1992 - Theologie Und Philosophie 67 (2):192-229.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.
    Scientific consensus is widely deferred to in public debates as a social indicator of the existence of knowledge. However, it is far from clear that such deference to consensus is always justified. The existence of agreement in a community of researchers is a contingent fact, and researchers may reach a consensus for all kinds of reasons, such as fighting a common foe or sharing a common bias. Scientific consensus, by itself, does not necessarily indicate the existence (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  36.  11
    Le coitus interruptus comme fiction de viol? Le point de vue d’un théologien catholique au début du xixe siècle.Claude Langlois - 2020 - Clio 52:119-136.
    Cet article cherche à mettre en lumière les modalités complexes qui, dans la théologie morale catholique, unissent pratique sexuelle et violence. Il le fait en prenant comme référence un moment spécifique (les années 1820) dans un espace singulier (la France malthusienne). Le théologien Jean-Baptiste Bouvier, acteur principal de cette réflexion, prenant acte de la réalité de la limitation des naissances par coitus interruptus, propose la fiction vraie de la non-culpabilité de la femme à laquelle son mari impose sa pratique (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  93
    Consensus of High-Order Nonlinear Multiagent Systems with Constrained Switching Topologies.Junwei Wang, Kairui Chen & Yun Zhang - 2017 - Complexity 2017:1-11.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  23
    Forged Consensus: Science, Technology, and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921-1953. David M. Hart.Peter Neushul - 2000 - Isis 91 (1):207-208.
  39.  51
    Consensus and the visual acuity of quark hunters — a response.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1982 - Synthese 50 (1):153 - 155.
  40.  52
    Justice Interruptus[REVIEW]Linda Nicholson - 2004 - International Studies in Philosophy 36 (4):116-117.
  41. Consensus Formation in Bioethics.Egbert Schroten - 1999 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 4:259-266.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  17
    TRUTH, CONSENSUS, AND PROBABILITY; On Peirce's definition of scientific truth.John M. Vickers - 1980 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (3):183-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  32
    Mathematical consensus: a research program.Roy Wagner - 2022 - Axiomathes 32 (3):1185-1204.
    One of the distinguishing features of mathematics is the exceptional level of consensus among mathematicians. However, an analysis of what mathematicians agree on, how they achieve this agreement, and the relevant historical conditions is lacking. This paper is a programmatic intervention providing a preliminary analysis and outlining a research program in this direction.First, I review the process of ‘negotiation’ that yields agreement about the validity of proofs. This process most often does generate consensus, however, it may give rise (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  44. The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent.Boaz Miller - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 228-237.
    This paper reviews current debates in social epistemology about the relations ‎between ‎knowledge ‎and consensus. These relations are philosophically interesting on their ‎own, but ‎also have ‎practical consequences, as consensus takes an increasingly significant ‎role in ‎informing public ‎decision making. The paper addresses the following questions. ‎When is a ‎consensus attributable to an epistemic community? Under what conditions may ‎we ‎legitimately infer that a consensual view is knowledge-based or otherwise ‎epistemically ‎justified? Should consensus be the aim (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  45. Convergence and Consensus in Public Reason.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4):261-280.
    Reasonable individuals often share a rationale for a decision but, in other cases, they make the same decision based on disparate and often incompatible rationales. The social contract tradition has been divided between these two methods of solving the problem of social cooperation: must social cooperation occur in terms of common reasoning, or can individuals with different doctrines simply converge on shared institutions for their own reasons? For Hobbes, it is rational for all persons, regardless of their theological beliefs, to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  46. Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients.Laura A. Hawryluck, William R. C. Harvey, Louise Lemieux-Charles & Peter A. Singer - 2002 - BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-9.
    Background Intensivists must provide enough analgesia and sedation to ensure dying patients receive good palliative care. However, if it is perceived that too much is given, they risk prosecution for committing euthanasia. The goal of this study is to develop consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients that help distinguish palliative care from euthanasia. Methods Using the Delphi technique, panelists rated levels of agreement with statements describing how analgesics and sedatives should be given to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  47. Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):35-49.
    Consensus conferences are social techniques which involve bringing together a group of scientific experts, and sometimes also non-experts, in order to increase the public role in science and related policy, to amalgamate diverse and often contradictory evidence for a hypothesis of interest, and to achieve scientific consensus or at least the appearance of consensus among scientists. For consensus conferences that set out to amalgamate evidence, I propose three desiderata: Inclusivity, Constraint, and Evidential Complexity. Two examples suggest (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  48. Consensus By Identifying Extremists.Robin D. Hanson - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (3):293-301.
    Given a finite state space and common priors, common knowledge of the identity of an agent with the minimal (or maximal) expectation of a random variable implies ‘consensus’, i.e., common knowledge of common expectations. This ‘extremist’ statistic induces consensus when repeatedly announced, and yet, with n agents, requires at most log2 n bits to broadcast.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  49.  26
    Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors.V. Yank - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):109-114.
    Objectives: To examine the perspectives of journal editors and authors on overlapping and redundant publications in clinical research.Design: Pretested cross-sectional survey, containing both forced choice and open ended questions, administered by mail to the senior editors and one randomly selected author from all journals in the Abridged Index Medicus that published clinical research.Main measurements: The views of editors and authors about the extent of redundant publications, why they occur, how to prevent and respond to cases, and when the publication of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  50. Reaching consensus in polarized moral debates.Joaquin Navajas, Facundo Álvarez Heduan, Juan Garrido, Pablo Gonzalez, Gerry Garbulsky, Dan Ariely & Mariano Sigman - 2019 - Current Biology 29 (23):4124–9.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 971