'Beyond consensus? A Reply to Alan Irwin.'

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (10):48-53 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a rejoinder to Alan Irwin's constructive response "Agreeing to Differ?" to our (2017) paper. We zoom in on the three main issues Irwin raises, namely (a) How to understand consensus? (b) Why are so many public participation activities consensus-driven? (c) Should we not value the art of closure, of finding ways to make agreements, particularly in view of the dire state of world politics today? We use this opportunity to highlight and further develop some of our ideas.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent.Boaz Miller - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 228-237.
Pluralism About Group Knowledge: A Reply to Jesper Kallestrup.Avram Hiller & R. Wolfe Randall - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1):39-45.
How to interpret collective aggregated judgments?María G. Navarro - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (11):26-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
385 (#74,313)

6 months
90 (#69,094)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeroen Van Bouwel
Ghent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations