Results for 'Causing Harm'

956 found
Order:
  1.  15
    Current periodical articles.Causing Harm & Bringing Aid - 1981 - American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Causing Harm -- A Logico-Legal Study.Philip Mullock - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (1):113-118.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  48
    Exploiting disadvantage as causing harm.Siba Harb & R. J. Leland - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (1):33-42.
    In Responding to Global Poverty, Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland argue that, while exploitation is morally problematic, responsibilities not to exploit are characteristically less stringent than responsibilities not to harm. They even suggest that exploiters’ responsibilities to assist the exploited may be weaker than the responsibilities of culpable bystanders who are able to help the poor but fail to do so We think Barry and Øverland underestimate the prospects of the exploitation argument. In our paper, we suggest that exploitation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 137--154.
    This paper argues that non-identity actions are wrong because they _cause_ harm to people. While non-identity actions also typically benefit people, failure to act would similarly benefit someone, so considerations of benefit are ineligible to justify the harm. However, in some non-identity cases, failure to act would not benefit anyone: cases where one is choosing whether to procreate at all. These are the _hard_ non-identity cases. Not all "different-number" cases are hard. In some cases, we don't know whether (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  5.  35
    Bad samaritans cause harm.John Harris - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (126):60-69.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  29
    Causing Harm: A Logico-Legal Study.Lennart Åqvist & Philip Mullock - 1989 - De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  7.  63
    Causing harm: Criminal law. [REVIEW]Philip Mullock - 1988 - Law and Philosophy 7 (1):67 - 105.
    This paper offers two related things. First, a theory of singular causal statements attributing causal responsibility for a particular harm to a particular agent based on the conjunction of a positive condition (necessitation) and a negative condition (avoidability) which captures the notions of sufficiency and necessity in intuitive ideas about agent causation better than traditional conditio sine qua non based theories. Second, a theory of representation of causal issues in the law. The conceptual framework is that of Game Trees (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  27
    Causing Harm and Bringing Aid.Jean Beer Blumenfeld - 1981 - American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4):323 - 329.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9. Whistling, Protecting, and Causing Harm.Robert Hauptman - 2011 - Journal of Information Ethics 20 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  19
    Clinical Trials Not Causing Harm With Potential for Realizing Benefit Should Continue.Brian Michael Jackson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (10):112-114.
    Volume 19, Issue 10, October 2019, Page 112-114.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  53
    When Corporations Cause Harm: A Critical View of Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Corporate Crimes.Rafael Alcadipani & Cíntia Rodrigues de Oliveira Medeiros - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 167 (2):285-297.
    Corporations perform actions that can inflict harm with different levels of intensity, from death to material loss, to both companies’ internal and external stakeholders. Research has analysed corporate harm using the notions of corporate social irresponsibility and corporate crime. Critical management studies have been subjecting management and organizational practices and knowledge to critical analysis, and corporate harm has been one of the main concerns of CMS. However, CMS has rarely been deployed to analyse CSIR and corporate crime. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  12.  42
    Causing Harm. A Logico-Legal Study. By Lennart Åqvist and Philip Mullock. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1989. Pp. 353.Martin Van Hees - 1997 - Ratio Juris 10 (3):351-355.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. (When) Are Authors Culpable for Causing Harm?Marcus Arvan - 2023 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 20 (1-2):47-78.
    To what extent are authors morally culpable for harms caused by their published work? Can authors be culpable even if their ideas are misused, perhaps because they failed to take precautions to prevent harmful misinterpretations? Might authors be culpable even if they do take precautions—if, for example, they publish ideas that others can be reasonably expected to put to harmful uses, precautions notwithstanding? Although complete answers to these questions depend upon controversial views about the right to free speech, this paper (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  95
    Why We Should Avoid Artists Who Cause Harm: Support as Enabling Harm.Bradley Elicker - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (2):306-319.
    This article examines our ethical responsibility toward artists engaged in harmful behaviors. Specifically, I demonstrate when and why we are morally obligated to withdraw our public and financial support from Artists Who Cause Harm such as Louis C.K., Terry Richardson, and Ryan Adams. Using a moral distinction presented by Philippa Foot and others, I identify this support as enabling harm when the wealth and influence that we support removes typical barriers that protect victims from harm and interposes (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15.  52
    Immigration enforcement and justifications for causing harm.Kevin K. W. Ip - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
    States are not only claiming the right to grant or deny entry to their territories but also enforcing this right against non-citizens in ways that cause significant harm to these individuals. In this article, I argue that endorsing the presumptive right to restrict immigration does not settle the question of when or how it may permissibly inflict harm on individuals to enforce this right. I examine three distinct justifications for causing harm to individuals. First, the justification (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. Going too far? How the public health anti-obesity drives could cause harm by promoting eating disorders.Jacinta O. A. Tan, Suzana Corciova & Dasha Nicholls - 2019 - In Kelso Cratsley & Jennifer Radden, Mental Health as Public Health: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Ethics of Prevention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm.Maura Priest - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):45-59.
    Published in the American Journal of Bioethics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  18. Small Impacts and Imperceptible Effects: Causing Harm with Others.Kai Spiekermann - 2014 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):75-90.
  19.  35
    Inclusive Blameworthiness and the Wrongfulness of Causing Harm.Evan Tiffany - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 25 (3).
    This paper takes up the question of whether the consequences of a person’s volitional actions can contribute to their blameworthiness. On the one hand it is intuitively plausible to hold that if D1 volitionally shoots V with the intention of killing V then D1 is blameworthy for V’s death. On the other hand, if the only difference between D1 and D2 is resultant luck, many find it counter-intuitive to hold that D1 is more blameworthy than D2. There are three broad (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  33
    Bypassing the gatekeeper: incidental negative cues stimulate choices with negative outcomes.Niek Strohmaier & Harm Veling - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (5):1059-1066.
    ABSTRACTThe Theory of Event Coding predicts that exposure to affective cues can automatically trigger affectively congruent behaviour due to shared representational codes. An intriguing hypothesis from this theory is that exposure to aversive cues can automatically trigger actions that have previously been learned to result in aversive outcomes. Previous work has indeed found such a compatibility effect on reaction times in forced-choice tasks, but not for action selection in free-choice tasks. Failure to observe this compatibility effect for aversive cues in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  17
    When Protection From Risk-to-Self Causes Harm: A Brief Analysis of Restraint Use to Prevent Elopement.Chelsey Patten & Benjamin Chaucer - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (7):97-100.
    Balancing patient rights with patient safety is a nuanced challenge. Restraint use, in particular, poses unique ethical challenges for healthcare systems. Realizing this, the American Nurses Associ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  57
    Smoke and Mirrors: When Professional Discipline may cause harm.Linda Haller - 2005 - Legal Ethics 8 (1):70-86.
  23.  15
    The influence of harm characteristics on endorsement of actions that cause harm.Robert A. McDonald & Irene Jacobsohn Norsworthy - 2000 - Teaching Business Ethics 4 (1):57-68.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  37
    The Tragic Science: How Economists Cause Harm (even as They Aspire to Do Good). George F. DeMartino. University of Chicago Press. xi + 265 pages. [REVIEW]Lukas Beck - 2023 - Economics and Philosophy 39 (3):522-527.
  25. Causing and preventing serious harm.Peter Unger - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 65 (3):227 - 255.
  26.  29
    Harm caused by adverse events in primary care: a clinical observational study.Raymond Wetzels, Rene Wolters, Chris van Weel & Michel Wensing - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):323-327.
  27.  73
    Eliminating the Harm We Cause.John K. Alexander - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):11-21.
    Peter Singer places a stringent requirement on us to come to the aid of those who are suffering, as long as we do not have to give up something of comparable worth. I consider some criticisms of this view here, while arguing in defense of Singer’s conclusion. I presume here that it is morally impermissible to create unnecessary and avoidable harm to innocent people. I argue that if we have an adequate understanding of agent causation and moral responsibility then (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Moral responsibility for harm caused by computer system failures.Douglas Birsch - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):233-245.
    When software is written and then utilized in complex computer systems, problems often occur. Sometimes these problems cause a system to malfunction, and in some instances such malfunctions cause harm. Should any of the persons involved in creating the software be blamed and punished when a computer system failure leads to persons being harmed? In order to decide whether such blame and punishment are appropriate, we need to first consider if the people are “morally responsible”. Should any of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Environmental harm: Political not biological.Mark Sagoff - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):81-88.
    In their fine paper, Evans et al. discuss the proposition that invasive non-native species are harmful. The question to ask is, “Harmful to whom?” Pathogens that make people sick and pests that damage their property—crops, for example—cause harms of kinds long understood in common law and recognized by public agencies. The concept of “ harm to the environment,” in contrast, has no standing in common law or legislation, no meaning for any empirical science, and no basis in a political (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  30.  32
    Liability for Wrongful Assistance: On Causing Unjust Harm in the Course of Suboptimal Rescue.Helen Frowe - 2022 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 39 (1):23-37.
    Several states, including the United Kingdom, the United States, and France, have recently engaged in the high-profile supporting of foreign rebel fighters, providing them with training, weapons, and financial resources. Justifications for providing this assistance usually invoke, at least in part, our obligations to prevent harm to the citizens of oppressive and violent regimes. Providing such assistance is often presented as a morally safe ‘middle ground’ between doing nothing and putting one’s own troops at risk. Yet this assistance typically (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Doing harm: living organ donors, clinical research and The Tenth Man.C. Elliott - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):91-96.
    This paper examines the ethical difficulties of organ donation from living donors and the problem of causing harm to patients or research subjects at their request. Graham Greene explored morally similar questions in his novella, The Tenth Man.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  32. Collective harm and the inefficacy problem.Julia Nefsky - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (4):e12587.
    This paper discusses the inefficacy problem that arises in contexts of “collective harm.‘ These are contexts in which by acting in a certain sort of way, people collectively cause harm, or fail to prevent it, but no individual act of the relevant sort seems to itself make a difference. The inefficacy problem is that if acting in the relevant way won’t make a difference, it’s unclear why it would be wrong. Each individual can argue, “things will be just (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  33. Harming Some to Benefit Others: Animal Rights and the Moral Imperative of Trap-Neuter-Release Programs.C. E. Abbate - 2018 - Between the Species 21 (1).
    Because spaying/neutering animals involves the harming of some animals in order to prevent harm to others, some ethicists, like David Boonin, argue that the philosophy of animal rights is committed to the view that spaying/neutering animals violates the respect principle and that Trap Neuter Release programs are thus impermissible. In response, I demonstrate that the philosophy of animal rights holds that, under certain conditions, it is justified, and sometimes even obligatory, to cause harm to some animals in order (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  34.  18
    The Problem of Harm in the Multiple Agent Context.Melinda Roberts - 2011 - Ethical Perspectives 18 (3):313.
    Lawyers and philosophers have found it challenging to construct an account of when an act causes harm that is broad enough to address multiple agent problems but not so broad that it fails to distinguish between genuinely harming a person and imposing a condition on a person that we deem undesirable. Thus, we may think an act causes harm only if it makes a difference to a person and, more specifically, makes things worse for that person. If the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Consequentialism, Climate Harm and Individual Obligations.Christopher Morgan-Knapp & Charles Goodman - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):177-190.
    Does the decision to relax by taking a drive rather than by taking a walk cause harm? In particular, do the additional carbon emissions caused by such a decision make anyone worse off? Recently several philosophers have argued that the answer is no, and on this basis have gone on to claim that act-consequentialism cannot provide a moral reason for individuals to voluntarily reduce their emissions. The reasoning typically consists of two steps. First, the effect of individual emissions on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  36.  43
    The harm principle and the greatest happiness principle: the missing link.Cinara Nahra - 2014 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 55 (129):99-110.
    Neste artigo, apresento uma solução possível para o clássico problema da aparente incompatibilidade entre o Princípio da Maior Felicidade de John Stuart Mill e seu Princípio da Liberdade, argumentando que na esfera "concernente aos outros" os julgamentos de experiência e o conhecimento acumulado através da história têm força moral e legal, enquanto na esfera "autoconcernente" os julgamentos dos experientes têm apenas valor prudencial, e a razão para isto é a ideia que cada um de nós é um juiz, melhor do (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  45
    Harmful Leader Behaviors: Toward an Increased Understanding of How Different Forms of Unethical Leader Behavior Can Harm Subordinates.Juliana Guedes Almeida, Deanne N. Den Hartog, Annebel H. B. De Hoogh, Vithor Rosa Franco & Juliana Barreiros Porto - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 180 (1):215-244.
    Research on unethical leadership has predominantly focused on interpersonal and high-intensity forms of harmful leader behavior such as abusive supervision. Other forms of harmful leader behavior such as excessively pressuring subordinates or acting in self-centered ways have received less attention, despite being harmful and potentially occurring more frequently. We propose a model of four types of harmful leader behavior varying in intensity and orientation : Intimidation, Lack of Care, Self-Centeredness, and Excessive Pressure for Results. We map out how these relate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38. Taking blood from children causes no more than minimal harm.M. Smith - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (3):127-131.
    The ethical question of whether taking blood from normal children for research purposes is justified, is determined in part at least, by whether or not the children are harmed. To try to assess the risks, the effects of venepuncture on a group of healthy subjects were studied, by means of a parental questionnaire completed approximately eighteen months after the venepuncture had taken place. Ninety-two healthy children aged between 6 and 8 had a blood sample taken for non-therapeutic reasons as part (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  39. Lesser-Evil Justifications for Harming: Why We’re Required to Turn the Trolley.Helen Frowe - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):460-480.
    Much philosophical attention has been paid to the question of whether, and why, one may divert a runaway trolley away from where it will kill five people to where it will kill one. But little attention has been paid to whether the reasons that ground a permission to divert thereby ground a duty to divert. This paper defends the Requirement Thesis, which holds that one is, ordinarily, required to act on lesser-evil justifications for harming for the sake of others. Cases (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  40.  14
    The harms of medicalisation: intersex, loneliness and abandonment.Charlotte Jones - 2022 - Feminist Theory 23 (1):39-60.
    This article develops loneliness as a political and social justice issue by illustrating the harmful personal and social consequences of the medical jurisdiction over and constitution of variations in sex characteristics. Whilst connections between loneliness, health and illness have been well established, this work customarily identifies the ways illness can lead to, or be caused by, loneliness. Instead, I provide an account of the central role of medicalisation and medical management in producing loneliness. By doing so, I underline the imperative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  76
    First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non‐maleficence.Ben Saunders - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (7):552-558.
    New reproductive technologies allow parents some choice over their children. Various moral principles have been suggested to regulate such choices. This article starts from a discussion of Julian Savulescu's Principle of Procreative Beneficence, according to which parents ought to choose the child expected to have the best quality of life, before combining two previously separate lines of attack against this principle. First, it is suggested that the appropriate moral principles of guiding reproductive choices ought to focus on general wellbeing rather (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  42.  62
    (1 other version)Animal Rights and the Duty to Harm: When to be a Harm Causing Deontologist.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 3 (1):5-26.
    An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals to promote trivial interests of humans, as is often done in the animal-user industries. But what should the rights view say about situations in which harming some animals is necessary to prevent intolerable injustices to other animals? I develop an account of respectful treatment on which, under certain conditions, it’s justified to intentionally harm some individuals to prevent serious harm to others. This can be compatible with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  43.  65
    Harm, Consent and the Limits of Privacy.Matthew Weait - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (1):97-122.
    Within the context of U.K. law, the right to respect for private life, articulated in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and acknowledged more opaquely in domestic legislation and case law, is one whose scope is unclear. Nowhere is this brought into sharper relief than in cases where conduct which manifests a person’s sexual identity, or concerns her intimate relations with others, is prima facie criminal. In this essay I attempt, through a discussion of cases in which (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Harming Groups: A Reflection on Long-term Harms of Climate Change.Jingsi Teng - 2024 - Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
    This project examines Derek Parfit’s (1984) non-identity problem, which suggests that our actions cannot harm future people if they would not exist without those actions. David Boonin’s (2014) non-identity argument proposes that if distant future people’s lives are worth living, our current actions, such as burning fossil fuels and causing climate change, cannot be bad for them. This argument relies on the person-affecting view, which is the belief that an action can only be bad if it is bad (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  46
    Harmful Research and the Paradox of Credibility.Torsten Wilholt - 2023 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):193-209.
    This paper discusses how to deal with research that threatens to cause harm to society—in particular, whether and in what cases bans and moratoria are appropriate. First, it asks what normative resources philosophy of science may draw on to answer such questions. In an effort to presuppose only resources acknowledgeable across different comprehensive worldviews, it is claimed that the aim of credibility provides a good basis for normative reflection. A close analysis reveals an inner tension inherent in the pursuit (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Causal Accounts of Harming.Erik Carlson, Jens Johansson & Olle Risberg - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (2):420-445.
    A popular view of harming is the causal account (CA), on which harming is causing harm. CA has several attractive features. In particular, it appears well equipped to deal with the most important problems for its main competitor, the counterfactual comparative account (CCA). However, we argue that, despite its advantages, CA is ultimately an unacceptable theory of harming. Indeed, while CA avoids several counterexamples to CCA, it is vulnerable to close variants of some of the problems that beset (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  47.  45
    Who is Responsible for Remedying the Harm Caused to Children of Prisoners?William Bülow - 2023 - Ethics and Social Welfare 17 (3):256-274.
    It has been argued that the social circumstances of many children of prisoners goes against established principles of social justice. In this paper the proper allocation of responsibility for remedying this social injustice is discussed. Through a discussion of four principles for allocating remedial responsibility, it is argued that the responsibility for children of incarcerated parents is shared among several actors, including the incarcerated parent, remaining caregivers, prison officials, social work professionals, and, to some extent, members of the wider community. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Harm: The counterfactual comparative account, the omission and pre-emption problems, and well-being.Tanya De Villiers-Botha - 2018 - South African Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):1-17.
    The concept of “harm” is ubiquitous in moral theorising, and yet remains poorly defined. Bradley suggests that the counterfactual comparative account of harm is the most plausible account currently available, but also argues that it is fatally flawed, since it falters on the omission and pre-emption problems. Hanna attempts to defend the counterfactual comparative account of harm against both problems. In this paper, I argue that Hanna’s defence fails. I also show how his defence highlights the fact (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49. The harms of prostitution: critiquing Moen's argument of no-harm.Anna Westin - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):86-87.
    In this short critical analysis, the author examines the recent argument by Moen in his article ‘Is Prostitution Harmful?' In highlighting why prostitution does not cause harm to either member involved in the act, Moen argues that prostitution is not an ethical concern. However, while Moen is able to clearly challenge contemporary objections to prostitution, the author of this review will suggest that Moen's argument is itself incomplete as it does not address essential key ontological issues. This critical analysis (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50.  27
    Invisible Harm.Kimberly Zieselman - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (2):122-125.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Invisible HarmKimberly ZieselmanI’m a 48–year–old intersex woman born with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS) writing to share my personal experience as a patient affected by a Difference of Sex Development (DSD). Although I appear to be a DSD patient “success story”, in fact, I have suffered and am unsatisfied with the way I was treated as a young patient in the 1980’s, and the continued lack of appropriate care for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 956