Isabelle Stengers’ thinking is sensitive, limpid, and complex. Her vision of living worlds is based on the philosophy of becoming and multiplicity. Becoming refers to a living change and therefore to an absence of permanence and natural laws to which we must adapt. Multiplicity refers to several regimes of truth, several types of reason, several modes of existence. Her knowledge universe is made up of several sets of beings and things where thought navigates fluidly between the fields of study. A (...) torrent of freedom that opens up new avenues for overcoming confinement and expanding action. This exploration of the ecology of practices provides the opportunity to address economic life, beyond the confines of academic discipline, as an open field that should be constantly widened through investigation by establishing the conditions of existence. (shrink)

The aim of this article is to discuss the idea that the notion of topos could become the future mathematics of AI, by giving more emphasis to geometric forms, compared to the currently mainstream approach, which favors numbers through statistical procedures. AI engineers are looking for theories that can formalize the basic elements that shape their daily work, as well as the basic operations that structure how the human brain works. The notion of topos could contribute largely to satisfying these (...) two main aspirations of AI engineering. The article is a part of a questioning on the nature of intelligence and supposedly intelligent machines. In this respect, it would be useful to enrich the approach that assimilates the topos as a kind of bridge that removes all the inessential aspects of things to be connected to keep an common essence that associates mathematical things. One of the most promising avenues from the archeology of the discourse on the topos is the reading by meaning. This art of reading well gives rise to the notion of conceptual strata which shows that the things to be connected have a layered configuration. What seems insignificant –in view of a supposed essence– through one conceptual stratum, might seem important through another, even capital. Rather than calling something ‘insignificant’, a consistent relativism of ‘insignificant for’ would be more appropriate, according to the conceptual stratum considered. (shrink)

Listening, seeing and reading Gilles Deleuze has had an influence on my thinking more than most of the economic writings I have consulted over the past quarter of a century. This discovery and furtherance of knowledge enriched my reflection and also allowed me to go beyond the general philosopher, as a philosopher opening the way to new horizons. It makes the researcher aware that the most important thing is not the philosopher man but the man philosopher, i.e. the one who (...) writes something that touches a human being at his deepest level and concerns him in his life every day. New generations of economists should meditate on this by going beyond the chapel quarrels coming from the Schumpeterian dichotomy 'science versus ideology'. To quote one of Deleuze's main ideas, no thinking against anything has been important over a long period; what counts are thoughts for something new that affect people's lives, and which are produced with rigor. This opens the way to a thought for life and not against life, which is in line with the progress of research in methodology, where it is a question of giving more importance to social ontology as a level of analysis and not focusing solely on epistemology in the narrowest sense. (shrink)

Read 'What can Economists Learn from Deleuze?'...

Aristotle's definition of the soul should be interpreted as: 'the soul is the entelechy of a natural body that serves as its instrument'.

Este libro es parte de la colección e-Libro en BiblioBoard.

Svoeobrazie nravstvennykh vozreniĭ K.N. Leontʹeva. Istoki ėticheskikh vzgli︠a︡dov K.N. Leontʹeva ; Fenomen "ėsteticheskogo amoralizma" -- Fenomen ėskhatologicheskoĭ ėtiki. Vizantizm kak nravstvennyĭ ideal ; Pravovoĭ ideal K.N. Leontʹeva v kontekste ėskhatologicheskoĭ ėtiki.

On significance of Yoga philosophy; contributed research papers.