Mental Competence or Best Interests?

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):151-152 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The anthropological approach to mental competence is very interesting. I shall reason that the issue of mental competence and the determination best interests in the decision making process has been integrated together in this anthropological approach. I use the relatively recent Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) for England and Wales (Department of Constitutional Affairs 2005) to illustrate this line of reasoning. I have deliberately chosen the phrase decision-making capacity (DMC) in this commentary to separate it from the concept of determination of best interests. I am writing from the perspective of an old-age psychiatrist who frequently has to assess DMC and make decisions on behalf of those who lack ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):111-115.
Conceptualization or Assessment: One at a Time or Both?Neelke Doorn - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):153-155.
Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.Peter Lucas - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
A practical guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005: principles in practice.Matthew Graham - 2015 - Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Edited by Jacqueline Cowley.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-23

Downloads
30 (#749,901)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?