An Analysis of Turing’s Criterion for ‘Thinking’

Philosophies 7 (6):124 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Turing proposed a new approach to the concept of thinking, based on his claim that intelligence is an ‘emotional concept’; and that the response-dependence interpretation of Turing’s ‘criterion for “thinking”’ is a better fit with his writings than orthodox interpretations. The aim of this paper is to clarify the response-dependence interpretation, by addressing such questions as: What did Turing mean by the expression ‘emotional’? Is Turing’s criterion subjective? Are ‘emotional’ judgements decided by social consensus? Turing’s take on these issues impacts current philosophical debates on response-dependent concepts and on the nature of artificial intelligence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intelligence Naturalized, Turing-style.Diane Proudfoot - 2024 - In Ali Hossein Khani, Gary Kemp, Hassan Amiriara & Hossein Sheykh Rezaee (eds.), Naturalism and its challenges. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 274—294.
Turing’s Three Senses of “Emotional”.Diane Proudfoot - 2014 - International Journal of Synthetic Emotions 5 (2):7-20.
Turing and Free Will: A New Take on an Old Debate.Diane Proudfoot - 2017 - In Alisa Bokulich & Juliet Floyd (eds.), Philosophical Explorations of the Legacy of Alan Turing. Springer Verlag. pp. 305-321.
Turing’s Responses to Two Objections.Darren Abramson - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (2):147-167.
Turing and the evaluation of intelligence.Francesco Bianchini - 2014 - Isonomia: Online Philosophical Journal of the University of Urbino:1-18.
Turing’s Concept of Intelligence.Diane Proudfoot - 2017 - In Jack Copeland, Jonathan Bowen, Robin Wilson & Mark Sprevak (eds.), The Turing Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 301-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-05

Downloads
36 (#626,850)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diane Proudfoot
University of Canterbury

Citations of this work

Turing’s Test vs the Moral Turing Test.Diane Proudfoot - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (4):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychologism and behaviorism.Ned Block - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (1):5-43.
Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity.Inkeri Koskinen - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1187-1207.
An analysis of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (4):249 - 257.

View all 21 references / Add more references