Why privacy is not enough privacy in the context of “ubiquitous computing” and “big data”

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (2):93-106 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose – Ubiquitous computing and “big data” have been widely recognized as requiring new concepts of privacy and new mechanisms to protect it. While improved concepts of privacy have been suggested, the paper aims to argue that people acting in full conformity to those privacy norms still can infringe the privacy of others in the context of ubiquitous computing and “big data”. Design/methodology/approach – New threats to privacy are described. Helen Nissenbaum's concept of “privacy as contextual integrity” is reviewed concerning its capability to grasp these problems. The argument is based on the assumption that the technologies work, persons are fully informed and capable of deciding according to advanced privacy considerations. Findings – Big data and ubiquitous computing enable privacy threats for persons whose data are only indirectly involved and even for persons about whom no data have been collected and processed. Those new problems are intrinsic to the functionality of these new technologies and need to be addressed on a social and political level. Furthermore, a concept of data minimization in terms of the quality of the data is proposed. Originality/value – The use of personal data as a threat to the privacy of others is established. This new perspective is used to reassess and recontextualize Helen Nissenbaum's concept of privacy. Data minimization in terms of quality of data is proposed as a new concept.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy exchanges: restoring consent in privacy self-management.Mario Pascalev - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (1):39-48.
Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?Daniel Susser & Laura Y. Cabrera - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):122-133.
Privacy concerns in integrating big data in “e-Oman”.Stuti Saxena - 2017 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 15 (4):385-396.
Privacy in the clouds.Ann Cavoukian - 2008 - Identity in the Information Society 1 (1):89-108.
The Ethics of Data Privacy.Jeroen Seynhaeve - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch
Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
115 (#185,125)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Towards a theory of privacy in the information age.James H. Moor - 1997 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):27-32.
Disclosive computer ethics.Philip Brey - 2000 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 30 (4):10-16.

View all 7 references / Add more references