Privacy exchanges: restoring consent in privacy self-management

Ethics and Information Technology 19 (1):39-48 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reviews the qualitative changes that big data technology introduced to society, particularly changes that affect how individuals control the access, use and retention of their personal data. In particular interest is whether the practice of privacy self-management in this new context could still ensure the informed consent of individuals to the privacy terms of big data companies. It is concluded that that accepting big data companies’ privacy policies falls short of the disclosure and understanding requirements for informed consent. The article argues that the practice of privacy self-management could remain viable if the review, understanding and acceptance of privacy agreements is streamlined, standardized and automated. Technology should be employed to counter the privacy problems created by big data technology. The creation of the privacy exchange authorities is proposed as a solution to the failures of privacy self-management. The PEA are intermediaries that empower individuals to define their own privacy terms and express informed consent in their dealings with data companies. They will create the technological infrastructure for individuals to select their own privacy terms from a list of standard choices, potentially only once. The PEA will further mediate the delivery and authentication of the individual users’ privacy terms to data companies. A logical proof of concept is offered, illustrating the potential steps involved in the creation of the PEA.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why privacy is not enough privacy in the context of “ubiquitous computing” and “big data”.Tobias Matzner - 2014 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (2):93-106.
Privacy in the clouds.Ann Cavoukian - 2008 - Identity in the Information Society 1 (1):89-108.
Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-09

Downloads
47 (#491,890)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The challenge of regulating digital privacy.Bartlomiej Chomanski - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
The Ethics of Biosurveillance.S. K. Devitt, P. W. J. Baxter & G. Hamilton - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5):709-740.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The right to privacy.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):295-314.
Political and ethical perspectives on data obfuscation.Finn Brunton & Helen Nissenbaum - 2013 - In Mireille Hildebrandt & Katja de Vries, Privacy, due process and the computational turn. Abingdon, Oxon, [England] ; New York: Routledge. pp. 171.

Add more references