- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Pure science and practical interests: The origins of the Agricultural Research Council, 1930–1937 [Book Review]
Minerva 31 (2):129-150 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Foreign scientists, the Rockefeller foundation and the origins of agricultural science in Venezuela.Hebe M. C. Vessuri - 1994 - Minerva 32 (3):267-296.
The application of science and scientific autonomy in Great Britain: A case study of the Science and Engineering Research Council. [REVIEW]Brian Salter & Ted Tapper - 1993 - Minerva 31 (1):38-55.
Creating a funding regime for social research in Britain: The Heyworth Committee on social studies and the founding of the social science research council.Desmond King - 1997 - Minerva 35 (1):1-26.
“Exploiting a wonderful opportunity”: The patronage of scientific research at Stanford University, 1937–1965. [REVIEW]Rebecca S. Lowen - 1992 - Minerva 30 (3):391-421.
Expansion policy and the role of agricultural research in Nazi Germany.Susanne Heim - 2006 - Minerva 44 (3):267-284.
Scientific research and agricultural innovation in Israel.Shaul Katz & Joseph Ben-David - 1975 - Minerva 13 (2):152-182.
The integration of research agencies for African agricultural development.H. C. Pereira - 1971 - Minerva 9 (1):38-45.
II An unpersuasive plea for centralised control of agricultural research: On a report of the Rockefeller Foundation. [REVIEW]Theodore W. Schultz - 1983 - Minerva 21 (1):141-143.
Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation. By National Research Council 2000. [REVIEW]Jeffery W. Bentley - 2003 - Agriculture and Human Values 20 (3):327-330.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
36 (#632,377)
6 months
7 (#728,225)
2013-12-01
Downloads
36 (#632,377)
6 months
7 (#728,225)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Cuts and the cutting edge: British science funding and the making of animal biotechnology in 1980s Edinburgh.Dmitriy Myelnikov - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Science 50 (4):701-728.
James Cossar Ewart and the Origins of the Animal Breeding Research Department in Edinburgh, 1895–1920.Clare Button - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (3):445-477.
Adjusting to precarity: how and why the Roslin Institute forged a leading role for itself in international networks of pig genomics research.James W. E. Lowe - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Science 54 (4):507-530.
Reflections on the reproductive sciences in agriculture in the UK and US, ca. 1900–2000+.Adele E. Clarke - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):316-339.
The farm and the clinic: an inquiry into the making of our biotechnological modernity.Jean-Paul Gaudillière - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):521-529.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-2w72m uwo