Adjusting to precarity: how and why the Roslin Institute forged a leading role for itself in international networks of pig genomics research

British Journal for the History of Science 54 (4):507-530 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the 1980s onwards, the Roslin Institute and its predecessor organizations faced budget cuts, organizational upheaval and considerable insecurity. Over the next few decades, it was transformed by the introduction of molecular biology and transgenic research, but remained a hub of animal geneticists conducting research aimed at the livestock-breeding industry. This paper explores how these animal geneticists embraced genomics in response to the many-faceted precarity that the Roslin Institute faced, establishing it as a global centre for pig genomics research through forging and leading the Pig Gene Mapping Project (PiGMaP); developing and hosting resources, such as a database for genetic linkage data; and producing associated statistical and software tools to analyse the data. The Roslin Institute leveraged these resources to play a key role in further international collaborations as a hedge against precarity. This adoption of genomics was strategically useful, as it took advantage of policy shifts at the national and European levels towards funding research with biotechnological potential. As genomics constitutes a set of infrastructures and resources with manifold uses, the development of capabilities in this domain also helped Roslin to diversify as a response to precarity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humanising and dehumanising pigs in genomic and transplantation research.James W. E. Lowe - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-27.
The governance of genomic information: will it come of age?Adèle Langlois - 2006 - Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (3):1-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-28

Downloads
14 (#1,275,508)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction: What Right? Which Organisms? Why Jobs?Brad Bolman - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (1):3-13.
Humanising and dehumanising pigs in genomic and transplantation research.James W. E. Lowe - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-27.

Add more citations