- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Searching the Brain: The Fourth Amendment Implications of Brain-Based Deception Detection Devices
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):62-63 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Predictive Brain Devices, Therapeutic Activation Systems, and Aggression.Jesper Ryberg - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):36-38.
Are Brain-Computer Interface Devices a Form of Internal Coercion?Eran Klein - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):32-34.
Thinking Ahead Too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices.Frederic Gilbert & Eliza Goddard - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1):49-51.
What Are the Subjective Processes in Our Brain? Empirical and Ethical Implications of a Relational Concept of the Brain.Georg Northoff - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (9):27-28.
The implications of caring for the injured brain.Monique Lanoix - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (9):35 – 36.
Brain imaging and the bill of rights: Memory detection technologies and american criminal justice.Dov Fox - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):34 – 36.
Ethical Implications of BRAIN 2.0: Beyond Bioethics, Beyond Borders.Gidon Felsen - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (3):196-198.
Self-deceive to countermine detection.Hui Jing Lu & Lei Chang - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):33-33.
Trusting Oneself and Others: Relational Vulnerability and DBS for Depression.Hannah Skye Martens & Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (4):226-227.
Constructing the Organ of Deceit: The Rhetoric of fMRI and Brain Fingerprinting in Post-9/11 America.Melissa Littlefield - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (3):365-392.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
31 (#729,492)
6 months
8 (#588,629)
2010-09-14
Downloads
31 (#729,492)
6 months
8 (#588,629)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices.Philipp Kellmeyer - 2018 - Neuroethics 14 (1):83-98.
Functional neuroimaging and the law: Trends and directions for future scholarship.Stacey A. Tovino - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56.
The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Stacey A. Tovino - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):844-850.
The lie of fmri: An examination of the ethics of a market in lie detection using functional magnetic resonance imaging. [REVIEW]Amy E. White - 2010 - HEC Forum 22 (3):253-266.
References found in this work
Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils.Paul Root Wolpe, Kenneth R. Foster & Daniel D. Langleben - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):39-49.
Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils.Daniel D. Langleben, Kenneth R. Foster & Paul Root Wolpe - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):40-48.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-qgv86 uwo