More download options

Are Brain-Computer Interface Devices a Form of Internal Coercion?

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):32-34 (2015) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Categories

Biomedical Ethics in Applied Ethics

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2015.1094546

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Operationalizing Agency in Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Research.Kristin Kostick, Peter Zuk & Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3):203-205.

The Continuity of BCI-Mediated and Conventional Action.Daniel Lim - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (1):59-61.

Predictive Brain Devices, Therapeutic Activation Systems, and Aggression.Jesper Ryberg - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):36-38.

Thinking Ahead Too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices.Frederic Gilbert & Eliza Goddard - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1):49-51.

Brain–Computer Interfaces and Interactive Capacity in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness.Christian S. Guay & Benjamin D. Schanker - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):141-142.

A P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Attention.Mahnaz Arvaneh, Ian H. Robertson & Tomas E. Ward - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.

Brain computer interface to enhance episodic memory in human participants.John F. Burke, Maxwell B. Merkow, Joshua Jacobs, Michael J. Kahana & Kareem A. Zaghloul - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.

Airborne ultrasonic tactile display contactless brain-computer interface paradigm.Rutkowski Tomasz & Shinoda Hiroyuki - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.

User’s Self-Prediction of Performance in Motor Imagery Brain–Computer Interface.Minkyu Ahn, Hohyun Cho, Sangtae Ahn & Sung C. Jun - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.

Decoding of four movement directions using hybrid NIRS-EEG brain-computer interface.M. Jawad Khan, Melissa Jiyoun Hong & Keum-Shik Hong - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
30 (#755,642)

6 months
9 (#500,261)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Pattern theory of self and situating moral aspects: the need to include authenticity, autonomy and responsibility in understanding the effects of deep brain stimulation.Przemysław Zawadzki - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (3):559-582.

The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop?Frederic Gilbert, Terence O’Brien & Mark Cook - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (2):316-325.

Dimensions of the Threat to the Self Posed by Deep Brain Stimulation: Personal Identity, Authenticity, and Autonomy.Przemysław Zawadzki - 2020 - Diametros 18 (69):71-98.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.

A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.

Reviewing Autonomy: Implications of the Neurosciences and the Free Will Debate for the Principle of Respect for the Patient's Autonomy.Sabine Müller & Henrik Walter - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):205.

Add more references