Self-deceive to countermine detection

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):33-33 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Having evolved to escape detection of deception completely, self-deception must respond to social conditions registering different probabilities of detection. To be adaptive, it must have a mechanism to keep truthful information temporarily from the self during deception and retrieve it after deception. The memory system may serve this mechanism and provides a paradigm in which to conduct research on self-deception

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reviewing the logic of self-deception.Ellen Fridland - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):22-23.
Reflections on self-deception.William von Hippel & Robert Trivers - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):41-56.
Self-deceived about self-deception: An evolutionary analysis.Mario Heilmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):116-117.
Self-deception: A paradox revisited.Albert Bandura - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):16-17.
The weightless hat: Is self-deception optimal?Elias L. Khalil - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):30-31.
Self-deceivers' intentions and possessions.Michael Losonsky - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):121-122.
The uses of self-deception.Howard Rachlin & Marvin Frankel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):124-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
48 (#452,040)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?