- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Thinking Ahead Too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1):49-51 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Do Implanted Brain Devices Threaten Autonomy or the “Sense” of Autonomy?Laura Specker Sullivan - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):24-26.
Implantable Devices Should Come With a Contract.Dena S. Davis - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (8):23-25.
Too Much Satisfaction? The Impact of the Interview Timing on the Meaning-Making Processes.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (4):239-241.
Predictive Brain Devices, Therapeutic Activation Systems, and Aggression.Jesper Ryberg - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):36-38.
Are Brain-Computer Interface Devices a Form of Internal Coercion?Eran Klein - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):32-34.
What Lies Ahead for Neuroethics Scholarship and Education in Light of the Human Brain Projects?Karen S. Rommelfanger & L. Syd M. Johnson - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (1):1-3.
Select Interviews From the INS Annual Meeting—Keith Humphreys, Tom Insel, Uma Karmarkar, Carl Marci, Ariel Cascio, Winston Chiong, Frederic Gilbert, Cynthia Kubu, and Jonathan Pugh.Nathan Ahlgrim, Kristie Garza, Carlie Hoffman, Sarah Coolidge & Ryan H. Purcell - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):62-68.
The Ethics of Getting Ahead When All Heads Are Enhanced.Kristin Marie Kostick, J. S. Blumenthal-Barby, Eric A. Storch & Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):256-258.
“I Miss You Too”: More Voices Needed to Examine the Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation.Cassandra Thomson & Rebecca Segrave - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):122-123.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-06-22
Downloads
36 (#658,719)
6 months
8 (#390,329)
2018-06-22
Downloads
36 (#658,719)
6 months
8 (#390,329)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Deflating the “DBS causes personality changes” bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (1):1-17.
Personality and Authenticity in Light of the Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics: A Reply to Objections about Potential Therapeutic Applicability of Optogenetics.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk & Przemysław Zawadzki - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):W4-W7.
The Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics and the Need for Neuroethics.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk & Przemysław Zawadzki - 2020 - NanoEthics 14 (3):207-225.
Neurorights: The Land of Speculative Ethics and Alarming Claims?Frederic Gilbert & Ingrid Russo - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):113-115.
Controlling Brain Cells With Light: Ethical Considerations for Optogenetic Clinical Trials.Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (3):3-11.
References found in this work
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours.Frederic Gilbert - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (3):473-481.
Deep Brain Stimulation and Postoperative Suicidality Among Treatment Resistant Depression Patients: Should Eligibility Protocols Exclude Patients with a History of Suicide Attempts and Anger/Impulsivity?Frédéric Gilbert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):28-35.
Efficacy Testing as a Primary Purpose of Phase 1 Clinical Trials: Is it Applicable to First-in-Human Bionics and Optogenetics Trials?Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (2):20-22.
If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):31-46.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-gv576 uwo