Quantifying the impact of survivor treatment bias in observational studies

, , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):601-612 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00624.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies.Suhail A. R. Doi, Jan J. Barendregt & Adedayo A. Onitilo - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):653-657.
Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.Demissie Alemayehu & Joseph C. Cappelleri - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):579-583.
Strengthening the case for disease management effectiveness: un‐hiding the hidden bias.Ariel Linden, John L. Adams & Nancy Roberts - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2):140-147.
Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.Eyal Shahar - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (3):436-440.
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.
Marginal structural models: much ado about (almost) nothing.Eyal Shahar & Doron J. Shahar - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (1):214-222.
Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection process.Carrol Preston, Deborah Ashby & Rosalind Smyth - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):313-322.
Using balance statistics to determine the optimal number of controls in matching studies.Ariel Linden & Steven J. Samuels - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):968-975.
The impact of record‐linkage bias in the Cox model.Ileana Baldi, Antonio Ponti, Roberto Zanetti, Giovannino Ciccone, Franco Merletti & Dario Gregori - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (1):92-96.
13 Resisting variables–service user/survivor perspectives on researching coercion.Jasna Russo & Jan Wallcraft - 2011 - In Thomas W. Kallert, Juan E. Mezzich & John Monahan (eds.), Coercive treatment in psychiatry: clinical, legal and ethical aspects. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
42 (#530,040)

6 months
6 (#851,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references