- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):579-583 (2013)
Abstract
Rationale Despite their inherently pervasive limitations, data from observational studies are increasingly relied upon by health carOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Quantifying the impact of survivor treatment bias in observational studies.Peter C. Austin, Muhammad M. Mamdani, Carl van Walraven & Jack V. Tu - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):601-612.
Evaluating disease management programme effectiveness: an introduction to instrumental variables.Ariel Linden & John L. Adams - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2):148-154.
Strengthening the case for disease management effectiveness: un‐hiding the hidden bias.Ariel Linden, John L. Adams & Nancy Roberts - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2):140-147.
Comparative effectiveness research: evidence‐based medicine meets health care reform in the USA.Sandra J. Tanenbaum - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):976-984.
Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies.Suhail A. R. Doi, Jan J. Barendregt & Adedayo A. Onitilo - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):653-657.
Using balance statistics to determine the optimal number of controls in matching studies.Ariel Linden & Steven J. Samuels - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):968-975.
Observational studies.Minou Djannatian & Clarissa Valim - 2018 - In Felipe Fregni & Ben M. W. Illigens (eds.), Critical thinking in clinical research: applied theory and practice using case studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Reviewing methodologically disparate data: a practical guide for the patient safety research field.Katrina F. Brown, Susannah J. Long, Thanos Athanasiou, Charles A. Vincent, J. Simon Kroll & Nick Sevdalis - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):172-181.
Harm caused by adverse events in primary care: a clinical observational study.Raymond Wetzels, Rene Wolters, Chris van Weel & Michel Wensing - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):323-327.
Evaluating disease management programme effectiveness: an introduction to the regression discontinuity design.Ariel Linden, John L. Adams & Nancy Roberts - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2):124-131.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
45 (#495,167)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
2013-11-24
Downloads
45 (#495,167)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Comparative effectiveness research: evidence‐based medicine meets health care reform in the USA.Sandra J. Tanenbaum - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):976-984.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo