Results for 'stimulus similarity'

986 found
Order:
  1.  15
    Stimulus similarity and task familiarity as determinants of expectancy generalization.Douglas Heath - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):289.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  21
    Stimulus similarity and the effect of reinforcement in a pseudo-concept identification task.Juliet P. Shaffer & Robert K. Remple - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):593.
  3.  32
    The effect of stimulus similarity on the acquisition and extinction of a conditioned response.Darwin P. Hunt - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):278.
  4.  19
    The relationship of stimulus similarity and number of responses.Jack Richardson - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (6):478.
  5.  28
    Effects of task difficulty, stimulus similarity, and type of response on stimulus predifferentiation.Bennet B. Murdock Jr - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (2):167.
  6.  36
    Visual search and stimulus similar¬ity.John Duncan & Glyn W. Humphreys - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (3):433-458.
  7.  12
    Stimulus similarity and positive induction.James S. MacDonall & Henry Marcucella - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (1):43-46.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  36
    Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):114.
  9.  54
    A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):94.
  10.  24
    Mediating verbal responses and stimulus similarity as factors in conceptual naming by school age children.Harvey M. Lacey - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):113.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  29
    Differential relation of latency and response vigor to stimulus similarity in brightness discrimination.Alfred Castaneda & Leonard Worell - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):309.
  12.  23
    The effect of stimulus similarity on amount of cue-position patterning in discrimination problems.Barbara Notkin White & Charles C. Spiker - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2):131.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  34
    Role of stimulus similarity in equivalence training.Arthur Tomie, Gregory A. Davitt & David R. Thomas - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):146.
  14.  24
    Formal intralist stimulus similarity in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):634.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  20
    The relation of decision-time to stimulus similarity.William N. Dember - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1):68.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  28
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS.Malcolm D. Gynther - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408.
  17.  24
    Effect of stimulus similarity on retroactive masking.Elizabeth Fehrer - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):612.
  18.  20
    Effects of stimulus similarity on discrimination learning.Charles C. Spiker - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (6):393.
  19.  20
    Individual differences in interference from stimulus similarity.Willard N. Runquist & David Blackmore - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1):141.
  20.  36
    Stimulus generalization of the conditioned eyelid response to structurally similar nonsense syllables.David W. Abbott & Louis E. Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):368.
  21.  26
    Similarity in stimulus material and stimulus task on the formation of a new scale of judgment.M. E. Tresselt - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):241.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  22
    Stimulus Selection and Meaningfulness in Paired-Associate Learning with Stimulus Items of High Formal Similarity.R. S. Lockhart - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):242.
  23.  38
    Interference produced by phonetic similarities: Stimulus recognition, associative retrieval, or both?Douglas L. Nelson & Richard C. Borden - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):167.
  24.  30
    Information theory and stimulus encoding in free and serial recall: Ordinal position of formal similarity.Douglas L. Nelson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):537.
  25.  37
    Effect of stimulus degradation and similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgments.Robert G. Pachella & Dennis F. Fisher - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):7.
  26.  6
    Stimulus processing bias in anxiety-related fear generalisation: drift-diffusion modelling and subgroups differences.Donghuan Zhang, Min Fan, Biyao Zhang, Yixuan Feng, Gao Yu, Wei Chen, Feng Biao & Xifu Zheng - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    In fear differential conditioning, stimuli that resemble the conditioned stimulus (CS+) are more likely to trigger fear responses. Excessive fear responses on stimuli not like CS + are often associated with anxiety. However, the threat judgments process and how this process manifests itself differently in subgroups with different generalisation rule applications, is unclear. This study examines whether anxiety biases the threat decision process in fear generalisation paradigm and whether subgroups characterised by different generalisation gradients was interpreted differently by drift-diffusion (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  34
    Choice response times as functions of intralist similarity, stimulus type, and number of equally probable alternatives.Barry Gholson & Raymond H. Hohle - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):581.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  31
    Information theory and stimulus encoding in paired-associate acquisition: Ordinal position of formal similarity.Douglas L. Nelson & Frank A. Rowe - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):342.
  29.  31
    Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning.Samuel M. Feldman & Benton J. Underwood - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1):11.
  30.  19
    Formulation of a generalization surface for the simultaneous variation of stimulus and response similarity.Michael Shea - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):353.
  31.  21
    Generalization of reinforcement among similar responses made in altered stimulus situations.Melvin H. Marx & Benjamin B. Bernstein - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (6):355.
  32.  29
    Backward relative to forward recall as a function of stimulus meaningfulness and formal interstimulus similarity.Douglas L. Nelson, Frank A. Rowe, Jane E. Engel, Joseph Wheeler & Richard M. Garland - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):323.
  33.  29
    Ratings of stimulus encoding similarity as related to concreteness and meaningfulness.John W. Craghead & Frank W. Wicker - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):411-414.
  34.  32
    Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: Common stimulus and response items within the list.Takao Umemoto & Ernest R. Hilgard - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):97.
  35.  22
    Effects of meaningfulness of structurally similar CVSs on stimulus generalization of eyelid closure.David W. Abbott - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):511.
  36.  26
    Stimulus Parameters Underlying Sound‐Symbolic Mapping of Auditory Pseudowords to Visual Shapes.Simon Lacey, Yaseen Jamal, Sara M. List, K. Sathian & Lynne C. Nygaard - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (9):e12883.
    Sound symbolism refers to non‐arbitrary mappings between the sounds of words and their meanings and is often studied by pairing auditory pseudowords such as “maluma” and “takete” with rounded and pointed visual shapes, respectively. However, it is unclear what auditory properties of pseudowords contribute to their perception as rounded or pointed. Here, we compared perceptual ratings of the roundedness/pointedness of large sets of pseudowords and shapes to their acoustic and visual properties using a novel application of representational similarity analysis (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37. Generalization, similarity, and bayesian inference.Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
    Shepard has argued that a universal law should govern generalization across different domains of perception and cognition, as well as across organisms from different species or even different planets. Starting with some basic assumptions about natural kinds, he derived an exponential decay function as the form of the universal generalization gradient, which accords strikingly well with a wide range of empirical data. However, his original formulation applied only to the ideal case of generalization from a single encountered stimulus to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations  
  38.  40
    EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness.Armand Mensen, William Marshall & Giulio Tononi - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    A set of images can be considered as meaningfully different for an observer if they can be distinguished phenomenally from one another. Each phenomenal difference must be supported by some neurophysiological differences. Differentiation analysis aims to quantify neurophysiological differentiation evoked by a given set of stimuli to assess its meaningfulness to the individual observer. As a proof of concept using high-density EEG, we show increased neurophysiological differentiation for a set of natural, meaningfully different images in contrast to another set of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  26
    Some stimulus variables affecting solution shift performance.L. E. Bourne & Shirley Miller - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):291.
  40.  27
    From stimulus-driven to appraisal-driven attention: Towards differential effects of goal relevance and goal relatedness on attention?Audric Mazzietti, Virginie Sellem & Olivier Koenig - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (8):1483-1492.
    The Component Process Model posits that attention is appraisal-driven rather than stimulus-driven and that the appraisal of relevance is of critical importance in such a mechanism. This means that any stimulus can attract attention or not depending on how relevant it is appraised. This hypothesis was tested in an implicit border similarity judgement task, in which thirsty participants were presented with bottles and vases that were respectively very relevant and weakly relevant to their goal to quench their (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  21
    Effects of discrimination performance of similarity of previously acquired stimulus names.Kathryn J. Norcross - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):305.
  42.  30
    Transfer as a function of stimulus, response, and simultaneous stimulus and response similarity.Barbara S. Uehling & Benton J. Underwood - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):375.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  36
    Effects of labels on perceptual transfer: Stimulus and developmental factors.Phyllis A. Katz & Edward Zigler - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):73.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  40
    The electrophysiological correlates of stimulus visibility and metacontrast masking.Henry Railo & Mika Koivisto - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):794-803.
    There are conflicting views concerning the electrophysiological correlates of visual consciousness. Whereas one view considers a relatively late positive deflection as a primary correlate of consciousness, another model links consciousness with earlier negativity . The present experiment utilized metacontrast masking in investigating the electrophysiological correlates of visual consciousness. The participants were presented with target-mask sequences in three stimulus onset asynchronies. The target stimuli were followed by either a metacontrast mask or a similar-looking, but ineffective pseudomask. The results showed that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  45.  25
    Studies of distributed practice: IX. Learning and retention of paired adjectives as a function of intralist similarity.Benton J. Underwood - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (3):143.
  46.  40
    A Quantitative Account of the Behavioral Characteristics of Habituation: The Sometimes Opponent Processes Model of Stimulus Processing.Yerco E. Uribe-Bahamonde, Sebastián A. Becerra, Fernando P. Ponce & Edgar H. Vogel - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Habituation is defined as a decline in responding to a repeated stimulus. After more than eighty years of research, there is an enduring consensus among researchers on the existence of 9-10 behavioral regularities or parameters of habituation. There is no similar agreement, however, on the best approach to explain these facts. In this paper, we demonstrate that the Sometimes Opponent Processes (SOP) model of stimulus processing accurately describes all of these regularities. This model was proposed by Allan Wagner (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  33
    Goal-box and alley similarity in latent extinction.Jerry W. Koppman & Robert G. Grice - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6):611.
  48.  21
    Two roads leading to the same evaluative conditioning effect? Stimulus-response binding versus operant conditioning.Tarini Singh, Christian Frings & Eva Walther - 2024 - Cognition and Emotion 38 (5):825-833.
    Evaluative Conditioning (EC) refers to changes in our liking or disliking of a stimulus due to its pairing with other positive or negative stimuli. In addition to stimulus-based mechanisms, recent research has shown that action-based mechanisms can also lead to EC effects. Research, based on action control theories, has shown that pairing a positive or negative action with a neutral stimulus results in EC effects (Stimulus-Response binding). Similarly, research studies using Operant Conditioning (OC) approaches have also (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  51
    In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
    It is difficult to see how one can support the continuum between rules and similarity, as Pothos proposes. A similarity theory could dispense with the rules end of the continuum. The only thing that we need is one (or more than one) theory of similarity that goes beyond the stimulus-carrying information and behavioristic restrictions that have usually been attributed to similarity theories.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Representation is representation of similarities.Shimon Edelman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):449-467.
    Intelligent systems are faced with the problem of securing a principled (ideally, veridical) relationship between the world and its internal representation. I propose a unified approach to visual representation, addressing both the needs of superordinate and basic-level categorization and of identification of specific instances of familiar categories. According to the proposed theory, a shape is represented by its similarity to a number of reference shapes, measured in a high-dimensional space of elementary features. This amounts to embedding the stimulus (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
1 — 50 / 986