Results for 'immediate recall in minimal paired-associate learning, semantic-similarity compatibility'

982 found
Order:
  1.  44
    Semantic coding and short-term memory.A. D. Baddeley & Betty A. Levy - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):132.
  2.  30
    Minimal paired-associate learning.Lloyd R. Peterson & Margaret Jean Peterson - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (6):521.
  3.  22
    Imagery effects in continuous paired-associate learning.Edward J. Rowe & Shannon K. Smith - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):290.
  4.  24
    Context factors in paired-associate learning and recall.Donald M. Sundland & Delos D. Wickens - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):302.
  5.  52
    A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):94.
  6.  24
    Clustering in free recall following paired-associate learning.Peggy A. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):260.
  7.  25
    Word Meaning Contributes to Free Recall Performance in Supraspan Verbal List-Learning Tests.Sandrine Cremona, Gaël Jobard, Laure Zago & Emmanuel Mellet - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Supraspan verbal list-learning tests, such as the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), are classic neuropsychological tests for assessing verbal memory. In this study, we investigated the impact of the meaning of the words to be learned on 3 memory stages (short-term recall, learning, and delayed recall) in a cohort of 447 healthy adults. First, we compared scores obtained from the RAVLT (word condition) to those of an alternative version of this test using phonologically similar but meaningless items (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  41
    Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning.Lewis J. Kleinsmith & Stephen Kaplan - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):124.
  9.  31
    Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning.Samuel M. Feldman & Benton J. Underwood - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1):11.
  10.  22
    Effects of formal similarity on cue selection in verbal paired-associate learning.Jean C. Cohen & Barbara S. Musgrave - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):829.
  11.  23
    Acoustic similarity among stimuli as a source of interference in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):319.
  12.  21
    Stimulus Selection and Meaningfulness in Paired-Associate Learning with Stimulus Items of High Formal Similarity.R. S. Lockhart - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):242.
  13.  27
    Presentation rate effects in paired-associate learning.Robert C. Calfee & Rita Anderson - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):239.
  14.  24
    Formal intralist stimulus similarity in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):634.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  26
    Constant versus varied serial order in paired-associate learning: The effect of formal intralist similarity.Eugene D. Rubin & Sam C. Brown - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):257.
  16.  28
    Is the acquired-pleasantness effect in paired-associate learning free from confounding by meaningfulness and similarity?Albert Silverstein - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  47
    Wordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languages.Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Edward Gibson & Steven T. Piantadosi - 2017 - Cognitive Science:2149-2169.
    Although the mapping between form and meaning is often regarded as arbitrary, there are in fact well-known constraints on words which are the result of functional pressures associated with language use and its acquisition. In particular, languages have been shown to encode meaning distinctions in their sound properties, which may be important for language learning. Here, we investigate the relationship between semantic distance and phonological distance in the large-scale structure of the lexicon. We show evidence in 100 languages from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  18.  21
    Comparison of anticipation and recall methods in paired-associate learning.Charles N. Cofer, Florence Diamond, Richard A. Olsen, Judith S. Stein & Howard Walker - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):545.
  19.  22
    Meaningfulness and articulation of stimulus and response in paired-associate learning and recall.Raymond G. Hunt - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):262.
  20.  34
    Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):114.
  21.  24
    The importance of the within-trial interval in the superiority of the recall over anticipation method of paired-associate learning.Mitchell G. Brigell, Charles P. Thompson & Sam C. Brown - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (2):131-133.
  22.  37
    Effects of two- word stimuli on recall and learning in a paired-associate task.Barabara S. Musgrave & Jean Carl Cohen - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (2):161.
  23.  18
    Response learning in paired-associate lists as a function of intralist similarity.Benton J. Underwood, Willard N. Runquist & Rudolph W. Schulz - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):70.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24.  35
    Prerecall and postrecall imagery ratings with pictorial and verbal stimuli in paired-associate learning.Frank W. Wicker & Carolyn M. Evertson - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):75.
  25.  22
    Stimulus-recognition and response-recall dependency in paired-associate learning.Mary E. Grunke & James V. Hinrichs - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (6):453-455.
  26.  30
    Experimental studies in rote-learning theory. IV. Comparison of reminiscence in serial and paired-associate learning.C. I. Hovland - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (5):466.
  27.  17
    Structural effects of letter identity among stimuli in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):152.
  28.  41
    Effect of tests without feedback and presentation-test interval in paired-associate learning.Thomas K. Landauer & Lynn Eldridge - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):290.
  29.  37
    Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Ina Mcdonald Bilodeau & Harold Schlosberg - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):199.
  30.  26
    Interaction of arousal and number of learning trials in paired-associate learning.John W. Osborne - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):135.
  31.  30
    Independent variation of information storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning.W. K. Estes & Frank da Polito - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):18.
  32.  33
    Effects of word frequency and acoustic similarity on free-recall and paired-associate-recognition learning.Stephen W. Holborn, Karen L. Gross & Pamela A. Catlin - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):169.
  33.  27
    The Effect of Visual Mnemonics and the Presentation of Character Pairs on Learning Visually Similar Characters for Chinese-As-Second-Language Learners.Li-Yun Chang, Yuan-Yuan Tang, Chia-Yun Lee & Hsueh-Chih Chen - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:783898.
    This study investigates the effects of visual mnemonics and the methods of presenting learning materials on learning visually similar characters for Chinese-as-second-language (CSL) learners. In supporting CSL learners to build robust orthographic representations in Chinese, addressing the challenges of visual similarity of characters (e.g., 理 and 埋) is an important issue. Based on prior research on perceptual learning, we tested three strategies that differ in the extent to which they promote interrelated attention to the form and meaning of characters: (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  15
    Music Perception Abilities and Ambiguous Word Learning: Is There Cross-Domain Transfer in Nonmusicians?Eline A. Smit, Andrew J. Milne & Paola Escudero - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:801263.
    Perception of music and speech is based on similar auditory skills, and it is often suggested that those with enhanced music perception skills may perceive and learn novel words more easily. The current study tested whether music perception abilities are associated with novel word learning in an ambiguous learning scenario. Using a cross-situational word learning (CSWL) task, nonmusician adults were exposed to word-object pairings between eight novel words and visual referents. Novel words were either non-minimal pairs differing in all (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  19
    Minimal paired-associate learning.Lloyd R. Peterson & Kenneth P. Hillner - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):300.
  36.  23
    Effects of within-list and between-list acoustic similarity on the learning and retention of paired associates.Kent M. Dallett - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):667.
  37.  25
    Verbal paired-associate learning as a function of grouping similar stimuli or responses.Iris C. Rotberg & Myron Woolman - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):47.
  38.  24
    Similarity Judgment Within and Across Categories: A Comprehensive Model Comparison.Russell Richie & Sudeep Bhatia - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (8):e13030.
    Similarity is one of the most important relations humans perceive, arguably subserving category learning and categorization, generalization and discrimination, judgment and decision making, and other cognitive functions. Researchers have proposed a wide range of representations and metrics that could be at play in similarity judgment, yet have not comprehensively compared the power of these representations and metrics for predicting similarity within and across different semantic categories. We performed such a comparison by pairing nine prominent vector (...) representations with seven established similarity metrics that could operate on these representations, as well as supervised methods for dimensional weighting in the similarity function. This approach yields a factorial model structure with 126 distinct representation‐metric pairs, which we tested on a novel dataset of similarity judgments between pairs of cohyponymic words in eight categories. We found that cosine similarity and Pearson correlation were the overall best performing unweighted similarity functions, and that word vectors derived from free association norms often outperformed word vectors derived from text (including those specialized for similarity). Importantly, models that used human similarity judgments to learn category‐specific weights on dimensions yielded substantially better predictions than all unweighted approaches across all types of similarity functions and representations, although dimension weights did not generalize well across semantic categories, suggesting strong category context effects in similarity judgment. We discuss implications of these results for cognitive modeling and natural language processing, as well as for theories of the representations and metrics involved in similarity. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  39.  21
    Studies in retroactive inhibition: X. The influence of similarity of meaning between lists of paired associates.J. A. McGeoch & G. O. McGeoch - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (3):320.
  40.  19
    Associative interference in verbal paired-associate learning.Norma F. Besch & William F. Reynolds - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):554.
  41.  24
    Intermodal transfer in a paired-associates learning task.Gary L. Holmgren, Malcolm D. Arnoult & Winton H. Manning - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):254.
  42.  32
    Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: Common stimulus and response items within the list.Takao Umemoto & Ernest R. Hilgard - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):97.
  43.  24
    Mediated association in the paired-associate learning of children using heterogeneous and homogeneous lists.David S. Palermo - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):711.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  22
    Response elimination in noncorrection paired-associates learning.Ludwig Mosberg - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p1):94.
  45.  33
    Associative transfer in motor paired-associate learning as a function of amount of first-task practice.Charles C. Spiker & Ruth B. Holton - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):123.
  46. Semantical remarks on the progressive reading of the imperfective.Andrea Bonomi - unknown
    Since there are independent reasons for associating the habitual reading of the imperfective, in Italian, to a logical form based on universal or generic quantification, the purpose of Part I is to see how this kind of semantical structure accounts for another important interpretation of the imperfective: the progressive reading. And since in some particular cases the imperfective can also have a marginal interpretation which can be assimilated to a perfective effect (it is the so-called “narrative” reading), a further problem (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  31
    A replication of paired-associate learning as a function of S-R similarity.Slater E. Newman - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):592.
  48.  46
    The Missing Link Between Memory and Reinforcement Learning.Christian Balkenius, Trond A. Tjøstheim, Birger Johansson, Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11:560080.
    Reinforcement learning systems usually assume that a value function is defined over all states (or state-action pairs) that can immediately give the value of a particular state or action. These values are used by a selection mechanism to decide which action to take. In contrast, when humans and animals make decisions, they collect evidence for different alternatives over time and take action only when sufficient evidence has been accumulated. We have previously developed a model of memory processing that includes (...), episodic and working memory in a comprehensive architecture. Here, we describe how this memory mechanism can support decision making when the alternatives cannot be evaluated based on immediate sensory information alone. Instead we first imagine, and then evaluate a possible future that will result from choosing one of the alternatives. Here we present an extended model that can be used as a model for decision making that depends on accumulating evidence over time, whether that information comes from the sequential attention to different sensory properties or from internal simulation of the consequences of making a particular choice. We show how the new model explains both simple immediate choices, choices that depend on multiple sensory factors and complicated selections between alternatives that require forward looking simulations based on episodic and semantic memory structures. In this framework, vicarious trial and error is explained as an internal simulation that accumulates evidence for a particular choice. We argue that a system like this forms the “missing link” between more traditional ideas of semantic and episodic memory, and the associative nature of reinforcement learning. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  37
    Abstraction in verbal paired-associate learning.Barbara S. Musgrave & Jean C. Cohen - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  47
    Semantic satiation and paired-associate learning.R. N. Kanungo, W. E. Lambert & S. M. Mauer - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6):600.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 982