Order:
  1.  22
    From “Inclusion in What” to “Equity in What”: (Re)Thinking the Question of In/Equity in Precision Medicine and Health.Alessia Costa, Jerome Atutornu, Tuba Bircan, Daniela Boraschi, Sasha Henriques, Richard Milne, Lydia Okoibhole, Christine Patch & Anna Middleton - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):89-91.
    Precision medicine (PM) and genomics are increasingly scrutinized through the lens of health inequities. This is a welcome development for a field that, while concerned with health-related differen...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  8
    A Bourdieusian theory on communicating an opinion about AI governance.Brett Binst, Tuba Bircan & Annelien Smets - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-43.
    This paper examines an often overlooked yet significant threat to survey validity and epistemic justice: the unequal communication of opinion. We discuss research that signals the presence of this threat when studying public opinion about AI. Furthermore, we apply Bourdieu’s theoretical framework as a potential explanation of the inequality in communicating an opinion about AI. We describe this inequality and test our explanation by performing a multilevel analysis on four questions about AI governance from the Eurobarometer 92.3 and two questions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  33
    What Difference Can Public Engagement in Genome Editing Make, and for Whom?Richard Milne, Ugbaad Aidid, Jerome Atutornu, Tuba Bircan, Daniela Boraschi, Alessia Costa, Sasha Henriques, Christine Patch & Anna Middleton - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):58-60.
    Conley and colleagues (2023) explore how calls for broad public engagement (PE) in the case of heritable human genome editing are being put into action, reviewing the activities of five different i...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark