Order:
  1.  53
    On the distinction of empathic and vicarious emotions.Frieder M. Paulus, Laura Müller-Pinzler, Stefan Westermann & Sören Krach - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
  2.  20
    Elaborative encoding during REM dreaming as prospective emotion regulation.Stefan Westermann, Frieder M. Paulus, Laura Müller-Pinzler & Sören Krach - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (6):631-633.
  3.  46
    Advancing the neuroscience of social emotions with social immersion.Sören Krach, Laura Müller-Pinzler, Stefan Westermann & Frieder M. Paulus - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):427-428.
    Second-person neuroscience offers a framework for the study of social emotions, such as embarrassment and pride. However, we propose that an enduring mental representation of oneself in relation to others without a continuous direct social interaction is possible. We call this state and will explain its impact on the neuroscience of social emotions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  46
    Sleep to be social: The critical role of sleep and memory for social interaction.Susanne Diekelmann, Frieder M. Paulus & Sören Krach - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  43
    The Impact Factor Fallacy.Frieder M. Paulus, Nicole Cruz & Sören Krach - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:324900.
    The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the merits of scientists has faced significant criticism in recent years. We add to the current criticism in arguing that such an application of the JIF in policy and decision making in academia is based on false beliefs and unwarranted inferences. To approach the problem, we use principles of deductive and inductive reasoning to illustrate the fallacies that are inherent to using journal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  14
    On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI.Britta Wrede, Anna-Lisa Vollmer & Sören Krach - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e49.
    How do we switch between “playing along” and treating robots as technical agents? We propose interaction breakdowns to help solve this “social artifact puzzle”: Breaks cause changes from fluid interaction to explicit reasoning and interaction with the raw artifact. These changes are closely linked to understanding the technical architecture and could be used to design better human–robot interaction (HRI).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark