This book is devoted to a thorough analysis of the role that models play in the practise of physical theory. The authors, a mathematical physicist and a philosopher of science, appeal to the logicians’ notion of model theory as well as to the concepts of physicists.

A central tenet of cognitive linguistics is that adults’ knowledge of language consists of a structured inventory of constructions, including various two-argument constructions such as the active, the passive and “fronting” constructions. But how do speakers choose which construction to use for a particular utterance, given constraints such as discourse/information structure and the semantic fit between verb and construction? The goal of the present study was to build a computational model of this phenomenon for two-argument constructions in Mandarin. First, we (...) conducted a grammaticality judgment study with 60 native speakers which demonstrated that, across 57 verbs, semantic affectedness – as determined by further 16 native speakers – predicted each verb’s relative acceptability in the bei-passive and ba-active constructions, but not the Notional Passive and SVO Active constructions. Second, in order to simulate acquisition of these competing constraints, we built a computational model that learns to map from corpus-derived input to an output representation corresponding to these four constructions. The model was able to predict judgments of the relative acceptability of the test verbs in the ba-active and bei-passive constructions obtained in Study 1, with model-human correlations in the region of r = 0.5 and r = 0.3, respectively. Surprisingly, these correlations increased when lexical verb identity was removed; perhaps because this information leads to over-fitting of the training set. These findings suggest the intriguing possibility that acquiring constructions involves forgetting as a mechanism for abstracting across certain fine-grained lexical details and idiosyncrasies. (shrink)

Imperatives occur ubiquitously in natural languages. They produce forces which change the addressee’s cognitive state and regulate her actions accordingly. In real life we often receive conflicting orders, typically, issued by various authorities with different ranks. A new update semantics is proposed in this paper to formalize this idea. The general properties of this semantics, as well as its background ideas are discussed extensively. In addition, we compare our framework with other approaches of deontic logics in the context of normative (...) conflicts. (shrink)

「玻璃帷幕•懵懂篇Ⅲ」，承接「玻璃帷幕‧懵懂篇 Ⅱ」，幼嵐身受重傷，卻因為葉文芸一句話，令她憤而上臺演出。拿命與葉文芸賭氣的方幼嵐，是否會因此葬送演戲生涯？ 慕容麗華勸梅玉晴選擇愛情歸屬，她究竟會選擇葉文芸？還是柳季剛？ 柳季剛帶女人回家，被葉文芸抓姦在床，卻是經紀人繆于綸大發脾氣。到底發生了什麼事？ 愛戲成痴，卻對人沒有感情的葉文芸，屢屢被人侵犯底線，造成她為此昏迷不醒？一位巨星是否會因此殞落？ 戲劇節的賭局揭曉了。最後的結論究竟是什麼？ 零度劇團的下齣戲，導演是誰？演員又是哪些？劇碼為何？ 何雨煙成了零度劇團子團的團長，接下來，要面對的是什麼？ 明爭暗鬥的舞臺背後，隱藏了多少精彩可期的事情，敬請期待！.

本书共十一章,内容包括西方法律文化总述,西方法学文化,西方司法文化,西方法院文化,西方律师文化,中国法律文化总述,中国法学文化等.

The paper first raises the problem concerning the confirmation of idealized theories in science and its relationship to scientific realism. Then a solution by Laymon is discussed. It is then argued that two different types of idealization need to be distinguished and that only one of them produces false theories. But then, such “theories” are really theory-maps, which point to theories at the end of improvements. Finally, Laymon’s account is modified in accordance with the above insight.

內容簡介 經世需要安身，安身常為了經世。經世與安身，如車之兩輪，鳥之雙翼，相輔相成。但是，安身究竟如何經世？經世又怎麼反映安身的狀況？本書的論文，即是希望藉由具體史例，來分析這個重要問題。 劉芝慶，生長於花蓮玉里。關注領域為中國學術思想史，其中又以宋明理學以及先秦諸子、明清近代學術思想史用功最多，發表論文也多分布在這些部分。最感興趣的兩大核心主題，一是古人如何安身立命的問題，二是「達則兼 善天下」（孟子語）如何可能；前者為如何修身，後者為如何經世，兩者時而獨立，又時而交疊，而兩大主題也貫穿了至今的全部研究成果。.

本书是刘述先教授根据2005年担任第十八届钱宾四先生学术文化讲座的第三次讲演撰写而成. 全书以当代新儒家的观点清理儒学的三个时期的发展, 即先秦、宋明与当代.

本书包括梁漱溟生平及其心心理历程,梁漱溟人格特质研究,梁漱溟心理学思想的哲学基础,梁漱溟对心理科学学的理解,梁漱溟的分支心理学思想等八章内容。.