During the thirty years of Construction, studies in the history of Chinese philosophy have achieved great results, but not a few problems still remain. Those problems such as the problem of the subject matter, characteristics, and scope of the history of Chinese philosophy, the problem of the relationship between the study of the history of philosophy and real politics, the problem of evaluating the history of the ancient philosophers and their thought systems, the problem of critically inheriting the philosophical legacy, (...) etc. may be subsumed under the general heading of the problem of the methodology of the history of philosophy, which in more concrete terms involves the question of how to use dialectical materialism and historical materialism in the study and synthesis of the history of the development of Chinese philosophical thought, revealing its objective laws. These problems have not been just discovered today. They have been discussed and debated now for a long time, but they have not yet been resolved. It could even be said that because of circumstances lacking in intellectual democracy, the more these problems were debated, the farther they strayed from the truth. The cause has been that the "high-level theoretical demands" of those such as Chen Boda and Guan Feng, who were continually cracking the whip and issuing warnings from their intellectual platform, did not allow you to really solve these problems. And in the hands of the "gang of four" the history of Chinese philosophy had even fallen to the level of being a tainted, filthy study of history. For this reason, as today we return to discussing the problem of the methodology of the history of philosophy, we must first use a proper line of thought to encourage intellectual, scholarly democracy and thoroughly liberate thought. Without such a premise, it will be impossible to fully examine and scientifically solve any philosophical social science problem at all. (shrink)

本书包括:生平与著述;卢卡奇的马克思主义;以批判为已任的美学观;余音绕梁等内容。.

「玻璃帷幕•懵懂篇Ⅲ」，承接「玻璃帷幕‧懵懂篇 Ⅱ」，幼嵐身受重傷，卻因為葉文芸一句話，令她憤而上臺演出。拿命與葉文芸賭氣的方幼嵐，是否會因此葬送演戲生涯？ 慕容麗華勸梅玉晴選擇愛情歸屬，她究竟會選擇葉文芸？還是柳季剛？ 柳季剛帶女人回家，被葉文芸抓姦在床，卻是經紀人繆于綸大發脾氣。到底發生了什麼事？ 愛戲成痴，卻對人沒有感情的葉文芸，屢屢被人侵犯底線，造成她為此昏迷不醒？一位巨星是否會因此殞落？ 戲劇節的賭局揭曉了。最後的結論究竟是什麼？ 零度劇團的下齣戲，導演是誰？演員又是哪些？劇碼為何？ 何雨煙成了零度劇團子團的團長，接下來，要面對的是什麼？ 明爭暗鬥的舞臺背後，隱藏了多少精彩可期的事情，敬請期待！.

本书共十一章,内容包括西方法律文化总述,西方法学文化,西方司法文化,西方法院文化,西方律师文化,中国法律文化总述,中国法学文化等.

The paper first raises the problem concerning the confirmation of idealized theories in science and its relationship to scientific realism. Then a solution by Laymon is discussed. It is then argued that two different types of idealization need to be distinguished and that only one of them produces false theories. But then, such “theories” are really theory-maps, which point to theories at the end of improvements. Finally, Laymon’s account is modified in accordance with the above insight.

內容簡介 經世需要安身，安身常為了經世。經世與安身，如車之兩輪，鳥之雙翼，相輔相成。但是，安身究竟如何經世？經世又怎麼反映安身的狀況？本書的論文，即是希望藉由具體史例，來分析這個重要問題。 劉芝慶，生長於花蓮玉里。關注領域為中國學術思想史，其中又以宋明理學以及先秦諸子、明清近代學術思想史用功最多，發表論文也多分布在這些部分。最感興趣的兩大核心主題，一是古人如何安身立命的問題，二是「達則兼 善天下」（孟子語）如何可能；前者為如何修身，後者為如何經世，兩者時而獨立，又時而交疊，而兩大主題也貫穿了至今的全部研究成果。.