Results for 'Ethical authorship'

964 found
Order:
  1.  63
    Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.Elise Smith, Bryn Williams-Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul-Hus, Min Shi, Elena Diller, Katie Caudle & David B. Resnik - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1995-2022.
    Authorship is commonly used as the basis for the measurement of research productivity. It influences career progression and rewards, making it a valued commodity in a competitive scientific environment. To better understand authorship practices amongst collaborative teams, this study surveyed authors on collaborative journal articles published between 2011 and 2015. Of the 8364 respondents, 1408 responded to the final open-ended question, which solicited additional comments or remarks regarding the fair distribution of authorship in research teams. This paper (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  11
    The relation of intuitionism to the ethical doctrine of self-realization.No Authorship Indicated - 1896 - Psychological Review 3 (6):691-691.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  22
    A study of ethical principles.No Authorship Indicated - 1898 - Psychological Review 5 (4):447-447.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  14
    Psychological Literature: Ethical.No Authorship Indicated - 1894 - Psychological Review 1 (1):109-111.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  18
    Review of Animal models of human psychology: Critique of science, ethics, and policy. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 1999 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):227-228.
    Reviews the book, Animal models of human psychology: Critique of science, ethics, and policy by Kenneth J. Shapiro . The principle focus of most of this text is on the present-day use of animals in psychological research. In particular, Shapiro examines contemporary animal models of eating disorders, showing how psychology came to rely so heavily on animal models in the first place and how prevalent scientific attitudes about the use of animals in the laboratory have taken shape over the past (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  44
    Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship.Jordan R. Schoenherr - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  49
    Review of The mismeasure of desire: The science, theory, and ethics of sexual orientation. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 2001 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):98-98.
    Reviews the book, The mismeasure of desire: The science, theory, and ethics of sexual orientation by Edward Stein . It would hardly be overstating the matter to say that perhaps the single most hotly debated issue in both psychology and contemporary American culture is the nature and origins of human sexual desires. In opposition to the currently more widely accepted thesis that sexual orientation is determined at birth, philosopher and educator Edward Stein argues in this new book that much of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  35
    Review of Discovering existence with Husserl. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 1999 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):227-227.
    Reviews the book, Discovering existence with Husserl by Emmanuel Levinas, translated by Richard A. Cohen and Michael B. Smith. The work of Emmanuel Levinas represents one of the most innovative and influential expositions of twentieth-century phenomenology. His thought represents a radically new interpretation of the phenomenological project, the meaning of ethics, and the role of ontology and metaphysics in our discussion of the Other and the Good. 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  20
    The ethics of writing: authorship and legacy in Plato and Nietzsche.Sean Burke - 2010 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    What responsibility does an author bear for his legacy? Do 'catastrophic' misreadings of authors, as we have seen with totaliatarian readings of Plato and fascist interpretations of Nietzsche, testify to authorial recklessness? These and other questions are the starting point for a new theory of authorial ethics. Continuing the mission of the 'returned author' begun in his pioneering book The Death and Return of the Author, Burke recommends the 'law of genre' as a contract drawn up between author and reader (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  2
    Consortium Authorship: Ethical Tensions in Emerging Authorship Practices in Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research.Hub Zwart, Yasha Tenhagen, Mohammad Hosseini & Joël Doré - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-20.
    Traditional conceptions of academic authorship, e.g., the seemingly self-evident assumption that an author is someone who actually writes a text, is challenged by the complexity, scale, and collaborative nature of scientific research. Authors are expected to make a substantial contribution and to assume accountability for all aspects of the work, but in practice, many individuals listed as authors fail to meet all these criteria, notably in biomedical fields. In view of this tension between norm and practice, new conceptions of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  60
    Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/gift Authorship, and the Cultural/disciplinary Perspective.Judit Dobránszki & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1457-1472.
    Multiple authorship is the universal solution to multi-tasking in the sciences. Without a team, each with their own set of expertise, and each involved mostly in complementary ways, a research project will likely not advance quickly, or effectively. Consequently, there is a risk that research goals will not be met within a desired timeframe. Research teams that strictly scrutinize their modus operandi select and include a set of authors that have participated substantially in the physical undertaking of the research, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  12.  40
    The ethics of authorship: communication, seduction, and death in Hegel and Kierkegaard.Daniel Berthold-Bond - 2011 - New York: Fordham University Press.
    Introduction : Rorschach tests -- A question of style -- Live or tell -- Kierkegaard's seductions -- Hegel's seductions -- Talking cures -- A penchant for disguise : the death (and rebirth) of the author in Kierkegaard and Nietzsche -- Passing over : the death of the author in Hegel -- Conclusion : the melancholy of having finished -- Aftersong : from low down.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  20
    Review of Genes, genesis, and God: Values and their origins in natural and human history. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 1999 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):229-230.
    Reviews the book, Genes, genesis, and God: Values and their origins in natural and human history by Holmes Rolston III . Drawn from a series of lectures given by the author in November of 1997 at the University of Edinburgh as part of the Gifford Lectures, this book addresses the question of whether the supremely social and human phenomena of religion and ethics can be ultimately reduced to the phenomena of biology. Challenging much of what passes for unassailable truth in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  29
    Review of Martin Buber: The hidden dialogue. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 2000 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):242-243.
    Reviews the book, Martin Buber: The hidden dialogue by Dan Avnon . In this exciting and instructive volume, the author carefully examines the main themes and thrusts of Martin Buber's radical philosophy of dialogue. In recent years it has become increasingly clear that Buber's vision of the basic nature of human existence is not only profound in its intellectual scope and sophistication, but also deeply disturbing in its moral and ethical implications. This fine book, however, seeks to redress this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  26
    Review of Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 2000 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):244-245.
    Reviews the book, Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice by Frank C. Richardson, Blaine J. Fowers, and Charles B. Guignon . Not often in the discipline of psychology does a work of genuinely praiseworthy philosophical sophistication come along that also manages to avoid not only being overly narrow in its relevance but also avoids being filled with unintelligible and pseudo-intellectual jargon. This excellent text is an example of one such work. The authors divided their text into three major (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  90
    Review of Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 2002 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):76-76.
    Reviews the book, Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions by Martha C. Nussbaum . Drawing from an astounding array of sources, Nussbaum argues against the common understanding of emotions as irrational and animalistic impulses disconnected from our thoughts and reason. Rather, she argues that emotions are highly discriminating responses to what is of value and importance that are, therefore, suffused with intelligence and discernment. Nussbaum explores the structure of a wide range of emotions, in particular, compassion and love, in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  66
    Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries.Elise Smith, Matthew Hunt & Zubin Master - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):42.
    Over the past two decades, the promotion of collaborative partnerships involving researchers from low and middle income countries with those from high income countries has been a major development in global health research. Ideally, these partnerships would lead to more equitable collaboration including the sharing of research responsibilities and rewards. While collaborative partnership initiatives have shown promise and attracted growing interest, there has been little scholarly debate regarding the fair distribution of authorship credit within these partnerships.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  18.  67
    Responsible Authorship in Engineering Fields: An Overview of Current Ethical Challenges.Jason Borenstein - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):355-364.
    The primary aim of this article is to identify ethical challenges relating to authorship in engineering fields. Professional organizations and journals do provide crucial guidance in this realm, but this cannot replace the need for frequent and diligent discussions in engineering research communities about what constitutes appropriate authorship practice. Engineering researchers should seek to identify and address issues such as who is entitled to be an author and whether publishing their research could potentially harm the public.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19.  41
    Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature.Mehmet Ali Köseoglu, Mehmet Yildiz & Taha Ciftci - 2018 - Business Ethics: A European Review 27 (2):164-177.
    The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  45
    The ethical subject: Accountability, authorship, and practical reason.Svend Brinkmann - 2010 - SATS 11 (1):75-89.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  14
    Publication Ethics of Authorship in the Oral Health Sciences.William V. Giannobile - 2011 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 2 (2):157-159.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  27
    Anonymity, authorship, and blogger ethics.Amardeep Singh - 2008 - Symploke 16 (1-2):21-35.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  68
    Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.A. Sheikh - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):422-426.
    The research assessment exercise forms the basis for determining the funding of higher education institutions in the UK. Monies are distributed according to a range of performance criteria, the most important of which is “research outputs”. Problems to do with publication misconduct, and in particular, issues of justice in attributing authorship, are endemic within the research community. It is here argued that the research assessment exercise currently makes no explicit attempt to address these concerns, and indeed, by focusing attention (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24.  70
    (1 other version)Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors.Mohammad Hosseini, Luca Consoli, H. A. E. Zwart & Mariette A. Van den Hoven - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-21.
    Much has been said about the need for improving the current definitions of scientific authorship, but an aspect that is often overlooked is how to formulate and communicate these definitions to ensure that they are comprehensible and useful for researchers, notably researchers active in international research consortia. In light of a rapid increase in international collaborations within natural sciences, this article uses authorship of this branch of sciences as an example and provides suggestions to improve the comprehensibility of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  35
    Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers.A. Newman - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (7):420-423.
    Although the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has published clear guidance on the authorship of scientific papers, short-term contract research workers, who perform much of the research that is reported in the biomedical literature, are often at a disadvantage in terms of recognition, reward and career progression. This article identifies several professional, ethical and operational issues associated with the assignment of authorship, describes how a university department of primary care set about identifying and responding to the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  26.  45
    Hostage authorship and the problem of dirty hands.William Bülow & Gert Helgesson - 2018 - Research Ethics 14 (1):1-9.
    This article discusses gift authorship, the practice where co-authorship is awarded to a person who has not contributed significantly to the study. From an ethical point of view, gift authorship raises concerns about desert, fairness, honesty and transparency, and its prevalence in research is rightly considered a serious ethical concern. We argue that even though misuse of authorship is always bad, there are instances where accepting requests of gift authorship may nevertheless be the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  27.  14
    Can Authorship be Denied for Contract Work?Livia Puljak & Dario Sambunjak - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):1031-1037.
    Ethical considerations arise when individuals who were contracted and paid to conduct a research study and write it up for publication, are denied authorship on a scholarly publication on the grounds that their work was contracted and paid for. Each of the various stakeholders should be considered. Researchers need to make sure that the contract recognizes their intellectual contribution and their right to be named as authors if and when the contracted study is published. If authorship disputes (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  33
    Hostage authorship and dirty hands: A reply to Tang.William Bülow & Gert Helgesson - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (2):1-6.
    In a recent paper published in this journal, we discussed a phenomenon that we referred to as ‘hostage authorship’. By this we meant a practice where an undeserving person X is included as author o...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  51
    Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.Matko Marušić, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić & Ana Marušić - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):493-502.
    The authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) are widely accepted in biomedical journals, but many studies in large and prestigious journals show that a considerable proportion of authors do not fulfill these criteria. We investigated authorship contributions in a small medical journal outside the scientific mainstream, to see if poor adherence to authorship criteria is common in biomedical journals. We analyzed statements on research contribution, as checked by the corresponding author, for individual (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  30.  35
    Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit.Jeffrey C. Sandler & Brenda L. Russell - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):65 – 80.
    In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  31.  54
    Authorship and Publication Practices in the Social Sciences: Historical Reflections on Current Practices.Muriel J. Bebeau & Verna Monson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):365-388.
    An historical review of authorship definitions and publication practices that are embedded in directions to authors and in the codes of ethics in the fields of psychology, sociology, and education illuminates reasonable agreement and consistency across the fields with regard to (a) originality of the work submitted, (b) data sharing, (c) human participants’ protection, and (d) conflict of interest disclosure. However, the role of the professional association in addressing violations of research or publication practices varies among these fields. Psychology (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  32. Integrity in research : authorship & ethics.Sandra Carvalho & Gustavo Rivara - 2018 - In Felipe Fregni & Ben M. W. Illigens, Critical thinking in clinical research: applied theory and practice using case studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  13
    Authorship and Authority in Kierkegaard's Writings.Joseph Westfall (ed.) - 2018 - Bloomsbury Academic.
    Authorship is a complicated subject in Kierkegaard's work, which he surely recognized, given his late attempts to explain himself in On My Work as an Author. From the use of multiple pseudonyms and antonyms, to contributions across a spectrum of media and genres, issues of authorship abound. Why did Kierkegaard write in the ways he did? Before we assess Kierkegaard's famous thoughts on faith or love, or the relationship between 'the aesthetic,' 'the ethical,' and 'the religious,' we (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  12
    Authorship and Accountability: Kierkegaard and Anonymity in the Press.Joseph Westfall - 2024 - Journal of Religious Ethics 52 (3):330-352.
    Søren Kierkegaard was engaged with the press in a variety of ways throughout his authorship. Although studies of Kierkegaard's interactions with the public press of his time have largely focused on his dispute with the satirical newspaper, Corsaren, in this paper I examine his first engagement with the press—a mostly anonymous newspaper dispute with the Danish social activist, Orla Lehmann, about the freedom of the press in Denmark—as a lens through which to understand his thoughts on the press in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies.Elise Smith & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):199-212.
    While there has been significant discussion in the health sciences and ethics literatures about problems associated with publication practices (e.g., ghost- and gift-authorship, conflicts of interest), there has been relatively little practical guidance developed to help researchers determine how they should fairly allocate credit for multi-authored publications. Fair allocation of credit requires that participating authors be acknowledged for their contribution and responsibilities, but it is not obvious what contributions should warrant authorship, nor who should be responsible for the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  36.  52
    A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship.Mohammad Hosseini & Bert Gordijn - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (5).
    The article at hand presents the results of a literature review on the ethical issues related to scientific authorship. These issues are understood as questions and/or concerns about obligations, values or virtues in relation to reporting, authorship and publication of research results. For this purpose, the Web of Science core collection was searched for English resources published between 1945 and 2018, and a total of 324 items were analyzed. Based on the review of the documents, ten (...) themes have been identified, some of which entail several ethical issues. Ranked on the basis of their frequency of occurrence these themes are: 1) attribution, 2) violations of the norms of authorship, 3) bias, 4) responsibility and accountability, 5) authorship order, 6) citations and referencing, 7) definition of authorship, 8) publication strategy, 9) originality, and 10) sanctions. In mapping these themes, the current article explores major ethical issue and provides a critical discussion about the application of codes of conduct, various understandings of culture, and contributing factors to unethical behavior. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37. Encouraging research collaboration through ethical and fair authorship: A model policy.Jason J. Washburn - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (1):44 – 58.
    Realizing a comprehensive approach to evidence-based practice in psychology requires the collaboration of academic researchers and practicing clinicians. Increased collaboration is likely to contribute to the growing trend of multi-investigator projects, multiple-authored publications, and the subsequent conflicts regarding authorship credit and order. Recommendations and guidance on determining authorship credit and order are available in the literature; however, few concrete tools are available to assist in determining authorship credit and order. A model policy on authorship is presented. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  38. The “Death of the Author” in Hegel and Kierkegaard: On Berthold’s The Ethics of Authorship.Antony Aumann - 2011 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 32 (2):435-447.
    In The Ethics of Authorship, Daniel Berthold depicts G. W. F. Hegel and Søren Kierkegaard as endorsing two postmodern principles. The first is an ethical ideal. Authors should abdicate their traditional privileged position as arbiters of their texts’ meaning. They should allow readers to determine this meaning for themselves. Only by doing so will they help readers attain genuine selfhood. The second principle is a claim about language. To wit, language cannot express an author’s thoughts. I argue that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  16
    Questionable authorship and the problem of dirty hands: throwing missing authorship into the ring. In response to both Bulow and Helgesson, and Tang.Veronica Ranieri - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-5.
    The unethical practice of gift authorship and hostage authorship was portrayed in detail in previous issues of Research Ethics. The aim of this short article is to explore the impact of penalising...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  20
    “Technical” Contributors and Authorship Distribution in Health Science.Elise Smith - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (4):1-19.
    In health sciences, technical contributions may be undervalued and excluded in the author byline. In this paper, I demonstrate how authorship is a historical construct which perpetuates systemic injustices including technical undervaluation. I make use of Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual work to demonstrate how the power dynamics at play in academia make it very challenging to change the habitual state or “habitus”. To counter this, I argue that we must reconceive technical contributions to not be a priori less important based (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  32
    How Do Chemistry Faculty and Graduate Students Engage in Decision Making on Issues Related to Ethical and Responsible Conduct of Research Including Authorship?Yiyang Gao, Jasmin Wilson & Patricia Ann Mabrouk - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (3):1-26.
    In the United States National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health have mandated training STEM doctoral students in the ethical and responsible conduct of research to improve doctoral students' ethical decision-making skills; however, little is known about the process and factors that STEM faculty and graduate students use in their decision-making. This exploratory case study examined how four triads of chemistry faculty and their doctoral students recruited from three research universities in the eastern United States engaged (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  26
    Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes.Behrooz Astaneh, Lisa Schwartz & Gordon Guyatt - 2021 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (4):455-464.
    Authorship of a scientific paper is important in recognition of one’s work, and in the academic setting, helps in professional promotion. Conflicting views of authorship have led to disputes and debates in many scientific communities. Addressing ethical issues in medical research and publishing, and conforming to the requirements of international organizations and local research ethics boards, has become an essential part of the research endeavor. Ethical issues of biomedical authorship have been a matter of debate (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship.Barton Moffatt - 2011 - Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
    Although widespread throughout the biomedical sciences, the practice of honorary authorship—the listing of authors who fail to merit inclusion as authors by authorship criteria—has received relatively little sustained attention. Is there something wrong with honorary authorship, or is it only a problem when used in conjunction with other unethical authorship practices like ghostwriting? Numerous sets of authorship guidelines discourage the practice, but its ubiquity throughout biomedicine suggests that there is a need to say more about (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  44.  34
    Responsible Conduct of Research and Ethical Publishing Practices: A Proposal to Resolve ‘Authorship Disputes’ over Multi-Author Paper Publication.Satya Sundar Sethy - 2020 - Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (3):283-300.
    Responsible conduct of research and ethical publishing practices are debatable issues in the higher education literature. The literature suggests that ‘authorship disputes’ are associated with multi-author paper publication and linked to ethical publishing practices. A few research studies argue authorship matters of a multi-author paper publication, but do not explain how to arrange author list meaningfully in a multi-author paper. How is a principal author of a multi-author paper to be decided? The literature also does not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  27
    Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted.David B. Resnik, Kathy Partin & Taraswi Banerjee - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (4):1-25.
    In the last 20 years, there has been a sharp increase in the incidence of retractions of articles published in scientific journals, the majority of which are due to research misconduct. In some cases, researchers have revised and republished articles that were retracted due to misconduct, which raises some novel questions concerning authorship. Suppose that an article is retracted because one of the authors fabricated or falsified some data, but the researchers decide to salvage the useable data, make appropriate (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  19
    Authorship disputes and patient research participation: collaborating across backgrounds.Will Hall - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (1):90-101.
    Public participation and survivor research in mental health are widely recognized as vital to the field. At the same time, contributions of patient collaborators can present unique challenges to determining authorship. Using an unresolved dispute around research contributions to the American Psychiatric Association’s Psychiatric Services journal, authorship and contribution are addressed. Recommendations are suggested to prevent dilemmas and achieve responsible research credit inclusion, especially among researchers with different backgrounds and asymmetric power relations. Researchers and publishers can prepare proactively (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  88
    Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles.T. Prabhakar Clement - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):345-361.
    We propose a rational method for addressing an important question—who deserves to be an author of a scientific article? We review various contentious issues associated with this question and recommend that the scientific community should view authorship in terms of contributions and responsibilities, rather than credits. We propose a new paradigm that conceptually divides a scientific article into four basic elements: ideas, work, writing, and stewardship. We employ these four fundamental elements to modify the well-known International Committee of Medical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  48.  38
    Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions.Angelina Olesen, Latifah Amin & Zurina Mahadi - 2018 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (3):271-278.
    IntroductionTo explore academia perceptions and experience with unethical authorship practices in their respective institutions.Method21 in‐depth interviews were carried out.ResultsOur analysis revealed variability in experiences with various types of unethical authorship practices among the interviewees. Second, we found that unethical authorship practices are not so unusual among academia although the exact numbers of incidents are unknown due to the fact that such practices are seldom reported. Third, our interviewees revealed that the culture of ‘publish or perish’ could be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  49.  33
    Publish, Perish, or Salami Slice? Authorship Ethics in an Emerging Field.Matthew T. Bowers, Matthew Katz & Adam G. Pfleegor - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 156 (1):189-208.
    Researchers in several academic fields have indicated an increase in academic authorship disputes and the utilization of unethical authorship practices over the past few decades. This trend has been attributed to a variety of factors such as vague authorship guidelines, power disparities between researchers, dissimilar disciplinary and/or journal practices, and a lack of guidance for emerging scholars. As a rapidly emerging academic field, sport management (and its connected sub-fields) maintains the propensity for unclear procedures due to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  27
    Generative Artificial Intelligence as Hypercommons: Ethics of Authorship and Ownership.Gazi Islam & Michelle Greenwood - 2024 - Journal of Business Ethics 192 (4):659-663.
    In this editorial essay, we argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence programs (GenAI) draw on what we term a “hypercommons”, involving collectively produced inputs and labour that are largely invisible or untraceable. We argue that automatizing the exploitation of common inputs, in ways that remix and reconfigure them, can lead to a crisis of academic authorship in which the moral agency involved in scholarly production is increasingly eroded. We discuss the relationship between the hypercommons and authorship in terms of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 964