Results for 'Ante Marušić'

967 found
Order:
  1.  8
    Sociologija znanja i marksizam.Ante Marušić - 1977 - Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  3
    Ideologija, zbilja i istina.Ante Marušić - 1971 - [Split],: "Marko Marulić,".
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Svijet umjetnosti: marksističke interpretacije.Milan Damnjanović & Ante Marušić (eds.) - 1976 - Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. (1 other version)Promising against the Evidence.Berislav Marušić - 2013 - Ethics 123 (2):292-317.
    We often promise to ϕ despite having evidence that there is a significant chance that we won’t ϕ. This gives rise to a pressing philosophical problem: Are we irresponsible in making such promises since, it seems, we are insincere or irrational in making them? I argue that we needn’t be. When it’s up to us to ϕ, our practical reasons for ϕ-ing partly determine whether it is rational for us to believe that we will ϕ. That is why we can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  5. Intending is Believing: A Defense of Strong Cognitivism.Berislav Marušić & John Schwenkler - 2018 - Analytic Philosophy 59 (3):309-340.
    We argue that intentions are beliefs—beliefs that are held in light of, and made rational by, practical reasoning. To intend to do something is neither more nor less than to believe, on the basis of one’s practical reasoning, that one will do it. The identification of the mental state of intention with the mental state of belief is what we call strong cognitivism about intentions. It is a strong form of cognitivism because we identify intentions with beliefs, rather than maintaining (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  6. How Can Beliefs Wrong?: A Strawsonian Epistemology.Berislav Marušić & Stephen White - 2018 - Philosophical Topics 46 (1):97-114.
    We take a tremendous interest in how other people think of us. We have certain expectations of others, concerning how we are to figure in their thought and judgment. And we often feel wronged if those are disappointed. But it is puzzling how others’ beliefs could wrong us. On the one hand, moral considerations don’t bear on the truth of a belief and so seem to be the wrong kind of reasons for belief. On the other hand, truth-directed considerations seem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  7.  91
    Asymmetry arguments.Berislav Marušić - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):1081-1102.
    In the First Meditation, the Cartesian meditator temporarily concludes that he cannot know anything, because he cannot discriminate dreaming from waking while he is dreaming. To resist the meditator’s conclusion, one could deploy an asymmetry argument. Following Bernard Williams, one could argue that even if the meditator cannot discriminate dreaming from waking while dreaming, it does not follow that he cannot do it while awake. In general, asymmetry arguments seek to identify an asymmetry between a bad case that is entertained (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  8. Trust, Reliance and the Participant Stance.Berislav Marušić - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.
    It is common to think of the attitude of trust as involving reliance of some sort. For example, Annette Baier argues that trust is reliance on the good will of others, and Richard Holton argues that trust is reliance from a participant stance. However, it is puzzling how trust could involve reliance, because reliance, unlike trust, is responsive to practical reasons: we rely in light of reasons that show it worthwhile to rely, but we don’t trust in light of reasons (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  9. Locke's Simple Account of Sensitive Knowledge.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):205-239.
    Locke seems to hold that we have knowledge of the existence of external objects through sensation. Two problems face Locke's account. The first problem concerns the logical form of knowledge of real existence. Locke defines knowledge as the perception of the agreement or disagreement between ideas. However, perceiving agreements between ideas seems to yield knowledge only of analytic truths, not propositions about existence. The second problem concerns the epistemic status of sensitive knowledge: How could the senses yield certain knowledge? This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10. Propositions and Judgments in Locke and Arnauld: A Monstrous and Unholy Union?Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (2):255-280.
    Philosophers have accused locke of holding a view about propositions that simply conflates the formation of a propositional thought with the judgment that a proposition is true, and charged that this has obviously absurd consequences.1 Worse, this account appears not to be unique to Locke: it bears a striking resemblance to one found in both the Port-Royal Logic (the Logic, for short) and the Port-Royal Grammar. In the Logic, this account forms part of the backbone of the traditional logic expounded (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  11.  65
    Analytic Existentialism.Berislav Marusić & Mark Schroeder (eds.) - 2024 - Oxford University Press.
    Existentialist philosophy has, at times, been exceptionally popular. This is because of its promise of possibility, both in doctrine and in style: Its doctrine promises that we can break free from the shackles of cognitive or social structures we are thrown into, and we can overcome our marred personal or collective history. Its style promises that philosophy can be exciting, moving, exhilarating, and funny. Analytic Existentialism brings together ten essays in which analytic philosophers engage with existentialism. The essays take up (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  51
    Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.Matko Marušić, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić & Ana Marušić - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):493-502.
    The authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) are widely accepted in biomedical journals, but many studies in large and prestigious journals show that a considerable proportion of authors do not fulfill these criteria. We investigated authorship contributions in a small medical journal outside the scientific mainstream, to see if poor adherence to authorship criteria is common in biomedical journals. We analyzed statements on research contribution, as checked by the corresponding author, for individual authors of 114 (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  13. The Ethics of Belief.Berislav Marušić - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (1):33-43.
    The ethics of belief is concerned with the question what we should believe. According to evidentialism, one should believe something if and only if one has adequate evidence for what one believes. According to classic pragmatism, other features besides evidence, such as practical reasons, can make it the case that one should believe something. According to a new kind of pragmatism, some epistemic notions may depend on one’s practical interests, even if what one should believe is independent of one’s practical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  14. Agency and Evidence.Berislav Marusic & John Schwenkler - 2022 - In Luca Ferrero, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Agency. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 244-252.
    How does evidence figure into the reasoning of an agent? This is an intricate philosophical problem but also one we all encounter in our daily lives. In this chapter, we identify the problem and outline a possible solution to it. The problem arises, because the fact that it is up to us whether we do something makes a difference to how we should think of the evidence concerning whether we will actually do it. Otherwise we regard something that is up (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  47
    (1 other version)A New Philosophy of Society.Melanija Marušić - 2008 - Symposium 12 (2):209-213.
  16.  72
    Belief and Introspective Knowledge in Treatise 1.3.7.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2011 - Hume Studies 37 (1):99-122.
    Hume argues that the difference between belief and mere conception consists in a difference in the manner of conception. His argument assumes that the difference between belief and mere conception must be a function of either the content conceived or of the manner of conception; however, it is unclear what justifies this assumption. I argue that the assumption depends on Hume’s confidence that we can know immediately that we believe when we believe, and that we can only have such knowledge (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. On Phonologically Null Verbs: GO and Beyond.Franc Marusˇicˇ & Rok Zˇaucer - 2005 - In Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente & Erik Schoorlemmer, Proceedings of Console Xiii. pp. 231--248.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Hume on the Projection of Causal Necessity.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (4):263-273.
    A characteristically Humean pattern of explanation starts by claiming that we have a certain kind of feeling in response to some objects and then takes our having such feelings to provide an explanation of how we come to think of those objects as having some feature that we would not otherwise be able to think of them as having. This core pattern of explanation is what leads Simon Blackburn to dub Hume ‘the first great projectivist.’ This paper critically examines the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19. Does Hume hold a dispositional account of belief?Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):155-183.
    Philosophical theories about the nature of belief can be roughly classified into two groups: those that treat beliefs as occurrent mental states or episodes and those that treat beliefs as dispositions. David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature seems to contain a classic example of an occurrence theory of belief as he defines 'belief' as 'a lively idea related to or associated with a present impression' (Treatise 1.3.7.5 96). This definition suggests that believing is an occurrent mental state, such as (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  20.  83
    Skepticism Between Excessiveness and Idleness.Berislav Marušić - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):60-83.
    Skepticism seems to have excessive consequences: the impossibility of successful enquiry and differentiated judgment. Yet if skepticism could avoid these consequences, it would seem idle. I offer an account of moderate skepticism that avoids both problems. Moderate skepticism avoids excessiveness because skeptical reflection and ordinary enquiry are immune from one another: a skeptical hypothesis is out of place when raised with in an ordinary enquiry. Conversely, the result of an ordinary enquiry cannot be used to disprove skepticism. This ‘immunity’ can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  21. Belief and Difficult Action.Berislav Marušić - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12:1-30.
    Suppose you decide or promise to do something that you have evidence is difficult to do. Should you believe that you will do it? On the one hand, if you believe that you will do it, your belief goes against the evidence—since having evidence that it’s difficult to do it constitutes evidence that it is likely that you won’t do it. On the other hand, if you don’t believe that you will do it but instead believe, as your evidence suggests, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  22. Wittgenstein on time.Berislav Marusic - 2001 - Synthesis Philosophica 16 (1):97-102.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  42
    Embodied Radical Freedom: An Interpretation of Sartre's Theory of Radical Choice.Berislav Marusic - 2024 - In Berislav Marusić & Mark Schroeder, Analytic Existentialism. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-132.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  5
    Logica minor: a. 1741. scripta.Franjo Marušić - 1999 - Mostar: Ziral. Edited by Serafin Hrkač.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Locke on causation and cognition.Jennifer Marušic - 2019 - In Dominik Perler & Sebastian Bender, Causation and Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy. London: Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Berkeley on the Objects of Perception.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2018 - In Stefan Storrie, Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 40-60.
  27. The Self-Knowledge Gambit.Berislav Marušić - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):1977-1999.
    If we hold that perceiving is sufficient for knowing, we can raise a powerful objection to dreaming skepticism: Skeptics assume the implausible KK-principle, because they hold that if we don’t know whether we are dreaming or perceiving p, we don’t know whether p. The rejection of the KK-principle thus suggests an anti-skeptical strategy: We can sacrifice some of our self-knowledge—our second-order knowledge—and thereby save our knowledge of the external world. I call this strategy the Self-Knowledge Gambit. I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  28. Disagreement and alienation.Berislav Marušić & Stephen J. White - 2023 - Philosophical Perspectives 37 (1):210-227.
    This paper proposes to reorient the philosophical debate about peer disagreement. The problem of peer disagreement is normally seen as a problem about the extent to which disagreement provides one with evidence against one's own conclusions. It is thus regarded as a problem for individual inquiry. But things look different in more collaborative contexts. Ethical norms relevant to those contexts make a difference to the epistemology. In particular, we argue that a norm of mutual answerability applies to us when we (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  77
    Refuting The Whole System? Hume's Attack on Popular Religion in The Natural History of Religion.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):715-736.
    There is reason for genuine puzzlement about Hume's aim in ‘The Natural History of Religion’. Some commentators take the work to be merely a causal investigation into the psychological processes and environmental conditions that are likely to give rise to the first religions, an investigation that has no significant or straightforward implications for the rationality or justification of religious belief. Others take the work to constitute an attack on the rationality and justification of religious belief in general. In contrast to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30. Introduction.Berislav Marusic & Mark Schroeder - 2024 - In Berislav Marusić & Mark Schroeder, Analytic Existentialism. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Biological Foundations of Prediction in an Unpredictable Environment.M. Marušiç - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):485-499.
  32. (1 other version)Ibn Rushd wa-falsafatuh ; maʻa nuṣūṣ al-munāẓarah bayna Muḥammad ʻAbduh wa-Faraḥ Anṭūn.Faraḥ Anṭūn - 1981 - Bayrūt: Dār al-Ṭalīʻah lil-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr. Edited by Averroës.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. The desires of others.Berislav Marušić - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):385-400.
    An influential view, defended by Thomas Scanlon and others, holds that desires are almost never reasons. I seek to resist this view and show that someone who desires something does thereby have a reason to satisfy her desire. To show this, I argue, first, that the desires of some others are reasons for us and, second, that our own desires are no less reason-giving than those of others. In concluding, I emphasize that accepting my view does not commit one to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  44
    Dugald Stewart on Conjectural History and Human Nature.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2017 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (3):261-274.
    Dugald Stewart claims that conjectural history is ‘the peculiar glory of the latter half of the eighteenth century’. Yet it is hard to see why, in his view, conjectural histories are not merely confabulated just-so stories. This paper examines Stewart's views about the epistemic and moral value of conjectural history.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  35.  20
    Can Journal Editors Police Animal Welfare? Three Es for Three Rs in Scientific Journals.Ana Marusic - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):66-67.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  2
    Locke and Leibniz on epistemic autonomy.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - forthcoming - Southern Journal of Philosophy.
    This article argues that Locke's views about the nature of knowledge, on the one hand, and about the proper regulation of probable judgment, on the other hand, give rise to a radical form of individual epistemic autonomy. Three theses are defended: First, Locke's conception of the nature of knowledge implies that the knowledge of other individuals has little (to no) influence on whether one knows something. Locke denies that knowledge is the kind of thing that could, even in theory, be (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  15
    Painted Crosses and the Trajectories of Medieval Image Captions. Evidence from Thirteenth-Century Zadar and Beyond.Matko Matija Marušić - 2020 - Convivium 7 (2):92-109.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  64
    Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Psychology: An Integrative Review.Ante Glavas - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  39.  22
    Reporting violations of European Charter of Patients’ Rights: analysis of patient complaints in Croatia.Ana Marušić, Marin Viđak & Jasna Karačić - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-10.
    BackgroundThe European Charter of Patients' Rights (ECPR) presents basic patients' rights in health care. We analysed the characteristics of patients' complaints about their rights submitted through the official complaints system and to a non-governmental organization in Croatia.MethodsThe official system for patients’complaints in Croatia does not have a common pathway but offers different modes for addressing patient complaints. In this cross-sectional study, we analysed the reports about patients’ complaints from the official regional committees sent to the Ministry of Health. We also (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  67
    Interpersonal Reasoning: A Philosophical Psychology of Testimonial Trust.Berislav Marušić - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
    Anscombe famously said, “It is an insult and it may be an injury not to be believed.” But what is it to believe someone? My aim is to show that understanding what it is to believe someone requires a conception of a distinctive kind of interpersonal reasoning. To do so, I develop an analogy between interpersonal reasoning and an Anscombean conception of practical reasoning. I suggest that the distinctive ‘form’ of interpersonal reasoning is recognition. I furthermore argue that this is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Geminos, Concise exposition of the meteorology of poseidonios (the extant fragment).Prevedla Fera Marusic - 2008 - Filozofski Vestnik 29 (1):149 - +.
  42.  23
    Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes.Jennifer S. Marušić - 2019 - Hume Studies 45 (1):69-75.
  43.  39
    Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study.Joeri Tijdink, Lidwine Mokkink, Ana Marušić, Natalie Evans, Guy Widdershoven, Lex Bouter, Rea Roje & Krishma Labib - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (4):1-22.
    To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study to explore which RI topics to address in institutional RI policies by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  44. What's wrong with promising to try?Berislav Marušić - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
    There is often something wrong with merely promising to try to φ. In this article I explain what is wrong with such promises. I argue that a promise to try to φ, when it is entirely up to us to φ, is always wrong because it hides a possible choice under the veil of our susceptibility to circumstances beyond our control. I furthermore argue that this is often also the case when matters are not entirely up to us. Finally, I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  49
    The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers’ Perceptions of Rules in Science.Alison L. Antes, Tammy English, Kari A. Baldwin & James M. DuBois - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):361-391.
    Successfully navigating the norms of a society is a complex task that involves recognizing diverse kinds of rules as well as the relative weight attached to them. In the United States, different kinds of rules—federal statutes and regulations, scientific norms, and professional ideals—guide the work of researchers. Penalties for violating these different kinds of rules and norms can range from the displeasure of peers to criminal sanctions. We proposed that it would be more difficult for researchers working in the U.S. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  46.  36
    Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement: Enabling Employees to Employ More of Their Whole Selves at Work.Ante Glavas - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  47.  82
    Hume: a very short introduction.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (1):140-143.
    In his Hume: A Very Short Introduction, James Harris describes Hume’s shift away from systematic philosophizing and towards the writing of essays, as a genre more “suitable to the literary culture...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  55
    No Grit without Freedom.Berislav Marušić - 2020 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 23 (1).
    In their article “Grit,” Jennifer Morton and Sarah Paul put forward an account of the rationality of grit. They argue that the gritty agent is epistemically resilient in her response to evidence of incapacity, and she is rational in doing so, insofar as such a response is epistemically permissible once she has taken on a commitment to pursuing a goal. In the present discussion, I argue that Morton and Paul disregard the significance of freedom for understanding the rationality of grit. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  75
    Comments on Michael Jacovides “how Berkeley corrupted his capacity to conceive”.Jennifer Smalligan Marusic - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):431-436.
    The manuscript includes comments on Michael Jacovides’s paper, “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” The paper and comments were delivered at the conference “Meaning and Modern Empiricism” held at Virginia Tech in April 2008. I consider Jacovides’s treatment of Berkeley’s Resemblance Argument and his interpretation of the Master Argument. In particular, I distinguish several ways of understanding the disagreement between Jacovides and Kenneth Winkler over the right way to read the Master Argument.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  22
    Do children derive exact meanings pragmatically? Evidence from a dual morphology language.Franc Marušič, Rok Žaucer, Amanda Saksida, Jessica Sullivan, Dimitrios Skordos, Yiqiao Wang & David Barner - 2021 - Cognition 207 (C):104527.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 967