Results for ' interaction'

954 found
Order:
See also
  1. George L. Gerstein.Interactions Within Neuronal - 1990 - In J. McGaugh, Jerry Weinberger & G. Lynch, Brain Organization and Memory: Cells, Systems, and Circuits. Guilford Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Hitman: Blood Money.[XBOX360].I. O. Interactive - forthcoming - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Can social interaction constitute social cognition?Hanne De Jaegher, Ezequiel Di Paolo & Shaun Gallagher - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10):441-447.
    An important shift is taking place in social cognition research, away from a focus on the individual mind and toward embodied and participatory aspects of social understanding. Empirical results already imply that social cognition is not reducible to the workings of individual cognitive mechanisms. To galvanize this interactive turn, we provide an operational definition of social interaction and distinguish the different explanatory roles – contextual, enabling and constitutive – it can play in social cognition. We show that interactive processes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   240 citations  
  4. Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors.Shaun Gallagher - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (3):163 – 174.
    In this paper I defend interaction theory (IT) as an alternative to both theory theory (TT) and simulation theory (ST). IT opposes the basic suppositions that both TT and ST depend upon. I argue that the various capacities for primary and secondary intersubjectivity found in infancy and early childhood should not be thought of as precursors to later developing capacities for using folk psychology or simulation routines. They are not replaced or displaced by such capacities in adulthood, but rather (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   112 citations  
  5.  88
    Coordinating Behaviors: Is social interaction scripted?Gen Eickers - 2023 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 53 (1):85-99.
    Some philosophical and psychological approaches to social interaction posit a powerful explanatory tool for explaining how we navigate social situations: scripts. Scripts tell people how to interact in different situational and cultural contexts depending on social roles such as gender. A script theory of social interaction puts emphasis on understanding the world as normatively structured. Social structures place demands, roles, and ways to behave in the social world upon us, which, in turn, guide the ways we interact with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  23
    You Look Human, But Act Like a Machine: Agent Appearance and Behavior Modulate Different Aspects of Human–Robot Interaction.Abdulaziz Abubshait & Eva Wiese - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:277299.
    Gaze following occurs automatically in social interactions, but the degree to which gaze is followed depends on whether an agent is perceived to have a mind, making its behavior socially more relevant for the interaction. Mind perception also modulates the attitudes we have towards others, and deter-mines the degree of empathy, prosociality and morality invested in social interactions. Seeing mind in others is not exclusive to human agents, but mind can also be ascribed to nonhuman agents like robots, as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  7. The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity.Fisher Matthew, Knobe Joshua, Strickland Brent & C. Keil Frank - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (4):1119-1134.
    We present experimental evidence that people's modes of social interaction influence their construal of truth. Participants who engaged in cooperative interactions were less inclined to agree that there was an objective truth about that topic than were those who engaged in a competitive interaction. Follow-up experiments ruled out alternative explanations and indicated that the changes in objectivity are explained by argumentative mindsets: When people are in cooperative arguments, they see the truth as more subjective. These findings can help (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  8.  30
    Interaction of information in word recognition.John Morton - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (2):165-178.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   216 citations  
  9.  69
    Grasping intersubjectivity: an invitation to embody social interaction research.Hanne De Jaegher, Barbara Pieper, Daniel Clénin & Thomas Fuchs - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):491-523.
    Underlying the recent focus on embodied and interactive aspects of social understanding are several intuitions about what roles the body, interaction processes, and interpersonal experience play. In this paper, we introduce a systematic, hands-on method for investigating the experience of interacting and its role in intersubjectivity. Special about this method is that it starts from the idea that researchers of social understanding are themselves one of the best tools for their own investigations. The method provides ways for researchers to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  10. Chinese Discourse and Interaction.[author unknown] - 2013
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Privacy and social interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
    This article joins in and extends the contemporary debate on the right to privacy. We bring together two strands of the contemporary discourse on privacy. While we endorse the prevailing claim that norms of informational privacy protect the autonomy of individual subjects, we supplement it with an argument demonstrating that privacy is an integral element of the dynamics of all social relationships. This latter claim is developed in terms of the social role theory and substantiated by an analysis of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  12. Action Ascription in Interaction.[author unknown] - 2022
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13. Dispositionalism, Causation, and the Interaction Gap.Joseph A. Baltimore - 2020 - Erkenntnis 87 (2):677-692.
    In taking properties to have powerful or dispositional essences, dispositionalism is primed to provide an account of causation. This paper lays out a challenge confronting the dispositionalist’s ability to account for how powers causally interact with one another so as to bring about collective results. The challenge, here labeled the “interaction gap,” is raised for two competing kinds of approaches to dispositional interaction: contribution combinationist and mutual manifestationist. After carefully highlighting and testing potential resources for closing the (...) gap, it is concluded that the mutual manifestationist approach holds a significant advantage. In turn, the importance of the interaction gap itself is highlighted. While powers prime an ontology to yield an account of causation, how far that account can actually go depends on the metaphysical details of one’s view of powers and their causal interaction. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  35
    Emotional signals in nonverbal interaction: Dyadic facilitation and convergence in expressions, appraisals, and feelings.Martin Bruder, Dina Dosmukhambetova, Josef Nerb & Antony S. R. Manstead - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (3):480-502.
    We examined social facilitation and emotional convergence in amusement, sadness, and fear in dynamic interactions. Dyads of friends or strangers jointly watched emotion-eliciting films while they either could or could not communicate nonverbally. We assessed three components of each emotion (expressions, appraisals, and feelings), as well as attention to and social motives toward the co-participant. In Study 1, participants interacted through a mute videoconference. In Study 2, they sat next to each other and either were or were not separated by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  15. The paradox of social interaction : shared intentionality, we-reasoning and virtual bargaining.Nick Chater, Hossam Zeitoun & Tigran Melkonyan - 2022 - Psychological Review 129 (3):415-437.
    Social interaction is both ubiquitous and central to understanding human behavior. Such interactions depend, we argue, on shared intentionality: the parties must form a common understanding of an ambiguous interaction (e.g., one person giving a present to another requires that both parties appreciate that a voluntary transfer of ownership is intended). Yet how can shared intentionality arise? Many well-known accounts of social cognition, including those involving “mind-reading,” typically fall into circularity and/or regress. For example, A’s beliefs and behavior (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  16. Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice.Shaun Gallagher & Daniel D. Hutto - 2008 - In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen, The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. John Benjamins. pp. 17–38.
    We argue that theory-of-mind (ToM) approaches, such as “theory theory” and “simulation theory”, are both problematic and not needed. They account for neither our primary and pervasive way of engaging with others nor the true basis of our folk psychological understanding, even when narrowly construed. Developmental evidence shows that young infants are capable of grasping the purposeful intentions of others through the perception of bodily movements, gestures, facial expressions etc. Trevarthen’s notion of primary intersubjectivity can provide a theoretical framework for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   195 citations  
  17.  20
    Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies/Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique.Meaning In Motion & Interaction In Cars - 2012 - Semiotica 2012 (191).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  37
    Sensitive periods, social interaction, and song acquisition: The dialectics of dialects?Irene M. Pepperberg - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (4):756-757.
  19. Descartes on mind-body interaction: What's the problem?Marleen Rozemond - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (3):435-467.
    I argue that Descartes treated the action of body on mind differently from the action of mind on body, as was common in the period. Descartes explicitly denied that there is a problem for interaction but his descriptions of interaction seem to suggest that he thought there was a problem. I argue that these descriptions are motivated by a different issue, the seemingly arbitrary connections between particular physical states and the particular mental states they produce. Within scholasticism there (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  20. Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person.Dan Zahavi - 2023 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 97 (1):82-103.
    Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest in the second-person perspective, not only in philosophy of mind, language, law and ethics, but also in various empirical disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. A distinctive and perhaps also slightly puzzling feature of this ongoing discussion is that whereas many contributors insist that a proper consideration of the second-person perspective will have an impact on our understanding of social cognition, joint action, communication, self-consciousness, morality, and so on, there remains (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  21. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment.Joshua D. Greene, Fiery A. Cushman, Lisa E. Stewart, Kelly Lowenberg, Leigh E. Nystrom & Jonathan D. Cohen - 2009 - Cognition 111 (3):364-371.
    In some cases people judge it morally acceptable to sacrifice one person’s life in order to save several other lives, while in other similar cases they make the opposite judgment. Researchers have identified two general factors that may explain this phenomenon at the stimulus level: (1) the agent’s intention (i.e. whether the harmful event is intended as a means or merely foreseen as a side-effect) and (2) whether the agent harms the victim in a manner that is relatively “direct” or (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   169 citations  
  22. Anticipating the Interaction between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology.Marianne Boenink, Tsjalling Swierstra & Dirk Stemerding - 2010 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (2).
    During the last decades several tools have been developed to anticipate the future impact of new and emerging technologies. Many of these focus on ‘hard,’ quantifiable impacts, investigating how novel technologies may affect health, environment and safety. Much less attention is paid to what might be called ‘soft’ impacts: the way technology influences, for example, the distribution of social roles and responsibilities, moral norms and values, or identities. Several types of technology assessment and of scenario studies can be used to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  23.  24
    Contingency and Units in Interaction.Cecilia E. Ford - 2004 - Discourse Studies 6 (1):27-52.
    Starting with Houtkoop and Mazeland’s study of discourse units, and touching upon recent studies aimed at detailing unit projection in interaction, this article argues that the drive toward abstract and discrete models for units and unit projection is potentially misleading. While it has been established that to engage in talk-in-interaction, as it unfolds in real time, participants rely on projectable units, research aimed at defining units unintentionally backgrounds the contingency inherent in interaction. A central function of language (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  24.  62
    Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions.Werner Deutsch & Thomas Pechmann - 1982 - Cognition 11 (2):159-184.
  25.  73
    A second-person neuroscience in interaction.Leonhard Schilbach, Bert Timmermans, Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Gary Bente, Tobias Schlicht & Kai Vogeley - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):441-462.
    In this response we address additions to as well as criticisms and possible misinterpretations of our proposal for a second-person neuroscience. We map out the most crucial aspects of our approach by (1) acknowledging that second-person engaged interaction is not the only way to understand others, although we claim that it is ontogenetically prior; (2) claiming that spectatorial paradigms need to be complemented in order to enable a full understanding of social interactions; and (3) restating that our theoretical proposal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  26. Understanding interaction: What Descartes should have told Elisabeth.Daniel Garber - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (S1):15-32.
  27.  82
    Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach.Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz - 2005 - Discourse Studies 7 (4-5):585-614.
    The article proposes a framework for the analysis of identity as produced in linguistic interaction, based on the following principles: identity is the product rather than the source of linguistic and other semiotic practices and therefore is a social and cultural rather than primarily internal psychological phenomenon; identities encompass macro-level demographic categories, temporary and interactionally specific stances and participant roles, and local, ethnographically emergent cultural positions; identities may be linguistically indexed through labels, implicatures, stances, styles, or linguistic structures and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  28. On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries.Valentine Hacquard - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3):279-315.
    This paper discusses the interaction of aspect and modality, and focuses on the puzzling implicative effect that arises when perfective aspect appears on certain modals: perfective somehow seems to force the proposition expressed by the complement of the modal to hold in the actual world, and not merely in some possible world. I show that this puzzling behavior, originally discussed in Bhatt (1999, Covert modality in non-finite contexts) for the ability modal, extends to all modal auxiliaries with a circumstantial (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  29. Facets of Interaction Between Users and Learning Objects in Codewitz.Wladimir Bodrow & Irina Bodrow - 2008 - Communication and Cognition. Monographies 41 (1-2):11-26.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Grammar as procedures: Language, interaction, and the predictive turn.Ruth Kempson & Ronnie Cann - 2018 - In Ken Turner & Laurence R. Horn, Pragmatics, truth and underspecification: towards an atlas of meaning. Boston: Brill.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Modeling Verbal and Nonverbal Interaction-a Catastrophe Theoretic Contribution to the Inter-grammar of Arndt and Janney.Steffen Nordahl Lund - 1994 - Hermes 12:141-157.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  47
    Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning.Lewis J. Kleinsmith & Stephen Kaplan - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):124.
  33. Human Interaction and the Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1969 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 14 (1):1-36.
  34. Modeling the economic interaction of agents with diverse abilities to recognize equilibrium patterns.Ariel Rubinstein - manuscript
    We model differences among agents in their ability to recognize temporal patterns of prices. Using the concept of DeBruijn sequences in two dynamic models of markets, we demonstrate the existence of equilibria in which prices fluctuate in a pattern that is independent of the fundamentals and that can be recognized only by the more competent agents. (JEL: C7, D4.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  24
    The Interaction between Central and Peripheral Processing in Chinese Handwritten Production: Evidence from the Effect of Lexicality and Radical Complexity.Qingfang Zhang & Chen Feng - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36.  33
    CNS–immune system interaction: A psychosomatic model.Stanford B. Friedman - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (3):400-401.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory.Johanna Seibt - 2009 - Synthese 166 (3):479-512.
    General Process Theory (GPT) is a new (non-Whiteheadian) process ontology. According to GPT the domains of scientific inquiry and everyday practice consist of configurations of ‘goings-on’ or ‘dynamics’ that can be technically defined as concrete, dynamic, non-particular individuals called general processes. The paper offers a brief introduction to GPT in order to provide ontological foundations for research programs such as interactivism that centrally rely on the notions of ‘process,’ ‘interaction,’ and ‘emergence.’ I begin with an analysis of our common (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  38.  21
    Epistemics in social interaction.Paul Drew - 2018 - Discourse Studies 20 (1):163-187.
    My argument here is principally that the ubiquity of epistemics is evident in the ways in which knowledge claims and attributions of knowledge to self and other are embedded in turns and sequences, inform the design of turns at talk, are amended in the corrections that speakers sometimes make, to change from one epistemic stance to another, and are contested, in the occasional ‘struggles’ between participants, as to which of them has epistemic primacy. I show that these cannot be understood (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  39.  21
    The elementary interaction force between a dislocation loop and the flux line lattice of a type II superconductor.Edward J. Kramer - 1976 - Philosophical Magazine 33 (2):331-342.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  45
    Intricate Axioms as Interaction Axioms.Guillaume Aucher - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (5):1035-1062.
    In epistemic logic, some axioms dealing with the notion of knowledge are rather convoluted and difficult to interpret intuitively, even though some of them, such as the axioms.2 and.3, are considered to be key axioms by some epistemic logicians. We show that they can be characterized in terms of understandable interaction axioms relating knowledge and belief or knowledge and conditional belief. In order to show it, we first sketch a theory dealing with the characterization of axioms in terms of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  88
    The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics.Lucas Champollion - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (1):31-66.
    Davidsonian event semantics is often taken to form an unhappy marriage with compositional semantics. For example, it has been claimed to be problematic for semantic accounts of quantification Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium, 2007), for classical accounts of negation Semantics and contextual expression, 1989), and for intersective accounts of verbal coordination. This paper shows that none of this is the case, once we abandon the idea that the event variable is bound at sentence level, and assume instead that verbs (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  42.  10
    Further evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control of responding: III.Robert W. Powell & Linda Palm - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 (4):307-310.
  43.  27
    Rule-specific dimensional interaction effects in concept learning.J. Steven Reznick, R. Daniel Ketchum & Lyle E. Bourne - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (4):314-316.
  44.  27
    Shall I Trust You? From Child–Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships.Cinzia Di Dio, Federico Manzi, Giulia Peretti, Angelo Cangelosi, Paul L. Harris, Davide Massaro & Antonella Marchetti - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Studying trust in the context of human-robot interaction is of great importance given the increasing relevance and presence of robotic agents in the social sphere, including educational and clinical. We investigated the acquisition, loss and restoration of trust when preschool and school-age children played with either a human or a humanoid robot in-vivo. The relationship between trust and the representation of the quality of attachment relationships, Theory of Mind, and executive function skills was also investigated. Additionally, to outline children’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  45.  29
    Logic and Interaction: Foreword to the Special Issue.Patrick Blackburn & Emiliano Lorini - 2022 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 31 (2):137-139.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Matter, information and their interaction in memory processes.Lauro Galzigna - 1982 - In Steven Peter Russell Rose & Dialectics of Biology Group, Against Biological Determinism. New York, N.Y.: Distributed in the USA by Schocken Books.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  64
    Reply to "the interaction order and the micro-macro distinction".Anne Warfield Rawls - 1992 - Sociological Theory 10 (1):129-132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Final-state interaction involving hyperons.Gerald A. Smith & James S. Lindsey - 1965 - In Karl W. Linsenmann, Proceedings. St. Louis, Lutheran Academy for Scholarship. pp. 2--251.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  57
    Interaction between language and vision: It’s momentary, abstract, and it develops.Banchiamlack Dessalegn & Barbara Landau - 2013 - Cognition 127 (3):331-344.
  50.  42
    Physics of brain-mind interaction.John C. Eccles - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):662-663.
1 — 50 / 954