The philosophy of human learning

New York: Routledge (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christopher Winch launches a vigorous Wittgensteinian attack on both the "romantic" Rousseauian and the "scientific" cognitivist traditions in learning theory. These two schools, he argues, are more closely related than is commonly realized.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
209 (#123,260)

6 months
3 (#1,277,498)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Winch
King's College London

Citations of this work

Epistemology of Education.J. Adam Carter & Ben Kotzee - forthcoming - Oxford Bibliographies Online.
Philosophy, Neuroscience and Education.John Clark - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (1):36-46.
Philosophical accounts of learning.Paul Hager - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (5):649–666.
Wittgenstein, Social Views and Intransitive Learning.Steinar Bøyum - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):491-506.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references