Making the right identification in the Turing test

Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The test Turing proposed for machine intelligence is usually understood to be a test of whether a computer can fool a human into thinking that the computer is a human. This standard interpretation is rejected in favor of a test based on the Imitation Game introduced by Turing at the beginning of "Computing Machinery and Intelligence."

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1011254505902

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Notes on the Turing test.C. Crawford - 1994 - Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37 (June):13-15.
Computing Machinery and Sexual Difference: The Sexed Presuppositions Underlying the Turing Test.Amy Kind - 2022 - In Keya Maitra & Jennifer McWeeny, Feminist Philosophy of Mind. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press, Usa.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Benny Shanon - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.
Shanon on the Turing test.Justin Leiber - 1989 - Journal of Social Behavior 19 (June):257-259.
Imitation versus communication: Testing for human-like intelligence.Jamie Cullen - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):237-254.
Artificial Intelligence.Diane Proudfoot & Jack Copeland - 2012 - In Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels & Stephen P. Stich, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 147-182.
Turing and the evaluation of intelligence.Francesco Bianchini - 2014 - Isonomia: Online Philosophical Journal of the University of Urbino:1-18.
¿Basta la prueba de Turing para definir la “inteligencia artificial”?Miguel Alfonseca - 2014 - Scientia et Fides 2 (2):129-134.
Intelligence is not deception: from the Turing test to community-based ascriptions.Markus Pantsar - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#123,547)

6 months
18 (#172,608)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Traiger
Occidental College

Citations of this work

The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment.Bernardo Gonçalves - 2023 - Minds and Machines 33 (1):1-31.
The Turing test.Graham Oppy & D. Dowe - 2003 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Turing's rules for the imitation game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

An analysis of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (4):249 - 257.
The computer model of mind.Ned Block - 1990 - In Daniel N. Osherson & Edward E. Smith, An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Visual cognition. 2. MIT Press.
Lessons from a restricted Turing test.Stuart M. Shieber - 1994 - Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37:70-82.

View all 10 references / Add more references