¿Basta la prueba de Turing para definir la “inteligencia artificial”?

Scientia et Fides 2 (2):129-134 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is Turing Test enough to define artificial intelligence?: Since 1950, when Alan Turing proposed his famous test to define artificial intelligence, no computer program has come near to fulfill it. Now that this goal seems a little closer and Turing test looks insufficient, it is convenient to remember John Searle’s argumentation against Turing test.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Benny Shanon - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.
Shanon on the Turing test.Justin Leiber - 1989 - Journal of Social Behavior 19 (June):257-259.
Minds, machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1 (4):5-25.
Notes on the Turing test.C. Crawford - 1994 - Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37 (June):13-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-06

Downloads
14 (#1,281,832)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references