The Medical Toxicologist in an Albanian Court: Ethical and Legal Issues

International Journal of Clinical Toxicology 1:27-30 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent developments in the field of forensic medicine and the judicial practice are both factors influencing considerably toward an increasing role of toxicologists in court hearings and litigation processes. The role of forensic toxicologist has been until a few decennia before a prerogative of the medico-legal specialists, but meanwhile a subspecialty of the general toxicology seems to have been created. Vis-à-vis the increasing presence of toxicologists in penal procedures of poisoning and intoxications, Albanian courts have created their own precedents and bylaws, regulating the presence, the opinion taking, and the relative importance such an expert opinion will have on the final sentence. Due to a multiplicity of factors, legal terminology with regard to drugs of abuse needs to be revised and parallel to such a revision a better defining of the role of expert toxicologist as a collector and interpreter of the scientific proofs seems necessary. Overlapping competencies with judicial bodies and confusing legislative measures will do nothing else but complicate issues that should be and can be easily resolved, through simple and appropriate interventions at different levels.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testing testimony: toxicology and the law of evidence in early nineteenth-century England.Ian A. Burney - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (2):289-314.
The Standard of Care in Medical Negligence—Moving on from Bolam?Harvey Teff - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (3):473-484.
Civil procedure and courts.Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow & Bryant G. Garth - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Influence of of legal positivism on forming philosophical and legal ideas in decision making by the supreme court of the usa.Ганна Вікторівна Коваленко - 2019 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 3 (42):126-141.
Civil procedure and courts.Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow & Bryant G. Garth - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Is it Easy to Remain Solely an Interpretator for a Court?Egidijus Baranauskas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 116 (2):201-210.
The Making of Evident Expertise: Transforming Chemical Analytical Methods into Judicial Evidence.Marcus B. Carrier - 2021 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 29 (3):261-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-11

Downloads
517 (#54,970)

6 months
128 (#40,535)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references