Discussions notes: Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discussions: Testability and ‘ ad-hocness ’ of the contraction hypothesis.K. R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50-a-50.
Popper's explications of ad hocness: Circularity, empirical content, and scientific practice.Greg Bamford - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):335-355.
Ad Hoc Philosophy of Science.Thomas Johansson - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (2):297-306.
Ad Hocness in Economics and Popperian Philosophy.D. Wade Hands - 1988 - In Neil de Marchi (ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. pp. 121-137.
Discussions notes: A dilemma defended.Geoffrey Sampson - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):353-355.
Discussions notes: The clock hypothesis and the lorentz transformations.W. G. V. Rosser - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):349-353.
Discussions: Notes on P. K. Feyerabend's criticism of positivism.R. Harré - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):43-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#313,875)

6 months
15 (#202,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Redhead
Last affiliation: London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
A Treatise on Probability.J. M. Keynes - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):219-222.
A treatise on probability.J. Keynes - 1924 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 31 (1):11-12.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.

View all 12 references / Add more references