Discussions: Testability and ‘ ad-hocness ’ of the contraction hypothesis

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50-a-50 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/x.37.50-a

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Popper's explications of ad hocness: Circularity, empirical content, and scientific practice.Greg Bamford - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):335-355.
Discussions notes: Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories.M. Redhead - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361.
Karl R. Popper. Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
Discussions: Thb falsifiability op the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis.Adolf Grünbaum - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
Comments on 'degree of confirmation' by professor K. R. Popper.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155-157.
Comments on `Degree of Confirmation' by Professor K. R. Popper.Jerusalem Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155.
What is the Problem of Ad Hoc Hypotheses?Greg Bamford - 1999 - Science & Education 8 (4):375 - 86..
Independent testability: The Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike experiments.Ronald Laymon - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):1-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
395 (#76,117)

6 months
13 (#197,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz׳s ether theory.Pablo Acuña - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):283-302.
De Broglie-Bohm Theory, Quo Vadis?Vera Matarese - 2022 - Foundations of Physics 53 (1):1-20.
Predictivism and avoidance of ad hoc-ness: An empirical study.Samuel Schindler - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):68-77.
Technological Origins of the Einsteinian Revolution.Donald Gillies - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):97-126.
Über die „Realität“ der FitzGerald-Lorentz-Kontraktion.Dieter Lorenz - 1982 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (2):294-319.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references