- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why New Technologies Should be Conceived as Social Experiments
Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):352-355 (2013)
Abstract
Peterson's objection to my proposal to treat new technologies as social experiments seems straightforward. Doing so would replace the old question ‘Is technology X ethically acceptable?’ (Let us ca...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
New Technologies Should not be Treated as Social Experiments.Martin B. Peterson - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):346-348.
What is the Point of Thinking of New Technologies as Social Experiments?Martin Peterson - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (1):78-83.
Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.Ronnie Hawkins - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):775-814.
Security-by-Experiment: Lessons from Responsible Deployment in Cyberspace.Wolter Pieters, Dina Hadžiosmanović & Francien Dechesne - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):831-850.
Philosophy, technology, and the environment.David M. Kaplan (ed.) - 2017 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Reckoning with assessment: Can we responsibly innovate? [REVIEW]Steven Umbrello - 2021 - Metascience 30 (1):41-43.
Ibo van de Poel and David E. Goldberg (eds): Philosophy and Engineering. An Emerging Agenda. [REVIEW]Ilse Oosterlaken - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):629-630.
Experiments on Socio-Technical Systems: The Problem of Control.Peter Kroes - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):633-645.
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.Ibo Poel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):667-686.
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.Ibo van de Poel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):667-686.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-31
Downloads
84 (#249,246)
6 months
11 (#343,210)
2013-10-31
Downloads
84 (#249,246)
6 months
11 (#343,210)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ethics from Within: Google Glass, the Collingridge Dilemma, and the Mediated Value of Privacy.Peter-Paul Verbeek & Olya Kudina - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (2):291-314.
The Role of Art in Emotional-Moral Reflection on Risky and Controversial Technologies: the Case of BNCI.Sabine Roeser, Veronica Alfano & Caroline Nevejan - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2):275-289.
The Food Warden: An Exploration of Issues in Distributing Responsibilities for Safe-by-Design Synthetic Biology Applications.Zoë Robaey, Shannon L. Spruit & Ibo van de Poel - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (6):1673-1696.
The Value of ‘Traditionality’: The Epistemological and Ethical Significance of Non-western Alternatives in Science.Mahdi Kafaee & Mostafa Taqavi - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-20.
Contact tracing apps: an ethical roadmap.Marjolein Lanzing - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (S1):87-90.
References found in this work
Can Technological Artefacts Be Moral Agents?Martin Peterson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):411-424.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-45kst uwo