What is the Point of Thinking of New Technologies as Social Experiments?

Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (1):78-83 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I respond to van de Poel’s claim that new technologies should be conceived as ongoing social experiments, which is an idea originally introduced by Schinzinger and Martin in the 1970s. I discuss and criticize three possible motivations for thinking of new technologies as ongoing social experiments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-27

Downloads
41 (#545,769)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

What Peterson Gets Wrong about Truman and The Bomb.John C. O’Day - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (1):69-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction to engineering ethics.Roland Schinzinger - 2000 - Boston: McGraw Hill. Edited by Mike W. Martin.
Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment.Ibo van de Poel - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (3):285 - 290.
Why New Technologies Should be Conceived as Social Experiments.Ibo van de Poel - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):352-355.
New Technologies Should not be Treated as Social Experiments.Martin B. Peterson - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):346-348.

Add more references