Abstract

In modeling of geoid model, global digital elevation models and global geopotential models involve in most part of the geoid computation process. Any errors in GDEMs and GGMs will introduce errors directly in geoid computation. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the six recent GGMs and new digital elevation model from TanDEM-X, as well as the previously available GDEMs, SRTM GDEMs, over the southern region of Peninsular Malaysia. The evaluation of GDEMs has been performed with the use of high-precision Global Navigation Satellite System and EGM96 as vertical reference consisting of 277 stations. Meanwhile, the evaluation of GGMs is carried out using sixty-two collocated GPS/leveling benchmarks. Based on the statistical analysis, it is shown that the improvement of DEM from TanDEM-X data is compared to the previously available DEMs, SRTM GDEMs. DEM from TanDEM-X of 30-m arc resolution is much better than TanDEM-X of 12-m arc resolution, as well as SRTM 30m and 90m. Comparison of GGMs with GNSS leveling shows that geoid height from GOCO05c fits well with the local geoid model.