Technology Changes the Ethical Stakes in HIV Surveillance and Prevention: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response”

&
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):W1-W3 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 20, Issue 10, October 2020, Page W1-W3.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2020.1815472

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response: Toward HIV Data Justice.Stephen Molldrem & Anthony K. J. Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):10-23.
Benefit of HIV Molecular Surveillance is Unclear, but Risks to Prevention Norms Are Clear.Bridget Haire - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):47-49.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
Furthering Discussion of Ethical Implementation of HIV Cluster Detection and Response.Meg Watson & Patricia Sweeney - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):24-26.
Adding a Voice to the Unique Ethical Considerations in Molecular HIV Surveillance.Farirai Mutenherwa, Douglas Wassenaar & Tulio de Oliveira - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):34-36.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Rationing Just Medical Care”.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):W1 - W3.
Molecular HIV Surveillance and Public Health Ethics: Old Wine in New Bottles.Liza Dawson & Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):39-41.
Fourth Pillar or “Third Rail?:” Towards a Community-Centered Understanding of the Role of Molecular HIV Surveillance in Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States.Justin C. Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):5-6.
Ethical Convergence and Ethical Possibilities: The Implications of New Materialism for Understanding the Molecular Turn in HIV, the Response to COVID-19, and the Future of Bioethics.Adrian Guta, Marilou Gagnon & Morgan M. Philbin - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):26-29.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Can Medical Repatriation Be Ethical? Establishing Best Practices”.Mark Kuczewski - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):W1-W3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-19

Downloads
38 (#648,670)

6 months
11 (#316,199)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is a Bioethics of the Oppressed in the Age of COVID-19?Craig M. Klugman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):29-31.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references