A puzzle about de rebus beliefs

Analysis 60 (4):297–299 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Boolos (1984, 1985) has extensively investigated plural quantifi- cation, as found in such locutions as the Geach-Kaplan sentence There are critics who admire only one another, and he found that their logic cannot be adequately formalized within the first-order predicate calculus. If we try to formalize the sentence by a paraphrase using individual variables that range over critics, or over sets or collections or fusions of critics, we misrepresent its logical structure. To represent plural quantification adequately requires the logical resources of the full second-order predicate calculus.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Geach‐Kaplan sentence reconsidered.Kentaro Fujimoto - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 109 (1):288-314.
Basics of Second-Order Predicate Logic.Nijaz Ibrulj - 2023 - The Logical Foresight 3 (1):1-14.
Plural quantification.Ø Linnebo - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
229 (#112,977)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Agustin Rayo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Vann McGee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Singular Concepts.Nathan Salmón - 2024 - Synthese 204 (20).
Word and objects.Agustín Rayo - 2002 - Noûs 36 (3):436–464.
Russell–Myhill and grounding.Boris Kment - 2022 - Analysis 82 (1):49-60.
Ordinal Type Theory.Jan Plate - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Quantifiers and propositional attitudes.Willard van Orman Quine - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 53 (5):177-187.
The ways of paradox.W. V. Quine - 1966 - New York,: Random.
Nominalist platonism.George Boolos - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.
Logic, Logic and Logic.George Boolos & Richard C. Jeffrey - 1998 - Studia Logica 66 (3):428-432.

View all 6 references / Add more references