Islamic bioethics of pain medication: an effective response to mercy argument

Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):4-15 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pain medication is one of the responses to the mercy argument that utilitarian ethicists use for justifying active euthanasia on the grounds of prevention of cruelty and appeal to beneficence. The researcher reinforces the significance of pain medication in meeting this challenge and considers it the most preferred response among various other responses. It is because of its realism and effectiveness. In exploring the mechanism and considerations related to pain medication, the researcher briefly touches the Catholic ethical position on the issue, a position that cannot be ignored in the development of contemporary bioethics. The researcher particularly deliberates on the contemporary Islamic discourse on the issue; by furthering the debate in line with the Islamic legal maxims and general guidance from the primary sources of Islamic law and ethics. The resolution on the issue is sought by synthesizing the views and legal maxims (al-Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah) on the issue, which in conclusion provide justification for pain medication by considerably regarding pain as necessity and pressing need. However, such resolution allows pain medication to the limit and proportion that removes the pain and prohibits overdosing the patient with medication that may directly cause the death.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Opiates and the Removal of Life Support.John F. Roth - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (3):409-415.
Double Effect and Pain Medication.Becket Gremmels - 2013 - Ethics and Medics 38 (1):1-4.
Religious and Secular Perspectives on the Value of Suffering.Jason T. Eberl - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2):251-261.
“Pain Takes Over Everything”: The Experience of Pain and Strategies for Management.Marie Crowe, Deb Gillon, Cate McCall & Jennifer Jordan - 2019 - In Marc A. Russo, Joletta Belton, Bronwyn Lennox Thompson, Smadar Bustan, Marie Crowe, Deb Gillon, Cate McCall, Jennifer Jordan, James E. Eubanks, Michael E. Farrell, Brandon S. Barndt, Chandler L. Bolles, Maria Vanushkina, James W. Atchison, Helena Lööf, Christopher J. Graham, Shona L. Brown, Andrew W. Horne, Laura Whitburn, Lester Jones, Colleen Johnston-Devin, Florin Oprescu, Marion Gray, Sara E. Appleyard, Chris Clarke, Zehra Gok Metin, John Quintner, Melanie Galbraith, Milton Cohen, Emma Borg, Nathaniel Hansen, Tim Salomons & Grant Duncan (eds.), Meanings of Pain: Volume 2: Common Types of Pain and Language. Springer Verlag. pp. 59-76.
Euthanasia: An Islamic Perspective.Malik Mohammad Manzoor (ed.) - 2011 - Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Islam and palliative care.K. A. Choong - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (1):28-42.
Narratives on Pain and Comfort.Ruth B. Purtilo - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):287-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
606 (#44,375)

6 months
130 (#39,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mohammad Manzoor Malik
Assumption University of Thailand

Citations of this work

Islam and palliative care.K. A. Choong - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (1):28-42.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
More impertinent distinctions and a defense of active euthanasia.Philippa Foot - 1994 - In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and Letting Die. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 267.

Add more references