- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Once More, with Feeling! Reply to Ainslie
Neuroethics 10 (1):155-156 (2017)
Abstract
Ainslie’s contribution offers a useful refinement of his powerful model of intertemporal bargaining. However, he focuses mostly on the cognitive mechanisms of choice. I suggest that these interact with emotional, personality, and developmental dynamics that cannot be ignored, either psychologically or neurally.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
No Need for the Disease Label: Choice is Complicated. Reply to Heather.Marc Lewis - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):125-127.
Aspiration fuels willpower: Evidence from the addiction literature.Gene M. Heyman - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.
Can the Harmful Dysfunction Analysis Explain Why Addiction is a Medical Disorder?: Reply to Marc Lewis.Jerome C. Wakefield - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (2):313-317.
Hyperbolic discount curves: a reply to Ainslie. [REVIEW]Andrew Musau - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (1):9-30.
Why Are There Developmental Stages in Language Learning? A Developmental Robotics Model of Language Development.Anthony F. Morse & Angelo Cangelosi - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (8):32-51.
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma.George Ainslie - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
On the coexistence of cognitivism and intertemporal bargaining.Keith E. Stanovich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):661-662.
Squaring the Circle: Addiction, Disease and Learning.Maia Szalavitz - 2016 - Neuroethics 10 (1):83-86.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-05-06
Downloads
32 (#741,023)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
2017-05-06
Downloads
32 (#741,023)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No Need for the Disease Label: Choice is Complicated. Reply to Heather.Marc Lewis - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):125-127.
Neurocentrism and Name-Calling: Let’s Agree to Agree. Reply to Satel & Lilienfeld.Marc Lewis - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):25-27.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8d48cdbf4-9dvq8 uwo