Why pure mathematical truths are metaphysically necessary: a set-theoretic explanation

Synthese 197 (7):3113-3120 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pure mathematical truths are commonly thought to be metaphysically necessary. Assuming the truth of pure mathematics as currently pursued, and presupposing that set theory serves as a foundation of pure mathematics, this article aims to provide a metaphysical explanation of why pure mathematics is metaphysically necessary.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-19

Downloads
367 (#84,433)

6 months
169 (#27,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hannes Leitgeb
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder, Metaphysical grounding: understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Angellic Content.Kit Fine - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):199-226.
A logic for 'because'.Benjamin Schnieder - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):445-465.

View all 21 references / Add more references