What numbers could not be

Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Numbers Could Not Be.Emily Katz - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (2):193-219.
What numbers could be (and, hence, necessarily are).Mark Eli Kalderon - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3):238-255.
Structure and the Concept of Number.Mark Eli Kalderon - 1995 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Numerical Foundations.Jean W. Rioux - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):3-29.
Reducing Arithmetic to Set Theory.A. C. Paseau - 2009 - In Ø. Linnebo O. Bueno, New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 35-55.
On what could have happened.Morton White - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (1):73-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,160 (#6,407)

6 months
134 (#44,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
Quality and concept.George Bealer - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Quantifying in.David Kaplan - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):178-214.

View all 556 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references