Avoiding certain frustration, reflection, and the cable guy paradox

Philosophical Studies 138 (3):317 - 333 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss the cable guy paradox, both as an object of interest in its own right and as something which can be used to illuminate certain issues in the theories of rational choice and belief. We argue that a crucial principle—The Avoid Certain Frustration (ACF) principle—which is used in stating the paradox is false, thus resolving the paradox. We also explain how the paradox gives us new insight into issues related to the Reflection principle. Our general thesis is that principles that base your current opinions on your current opinions about your future opinions need not make reference to the particular times in the future at which you believe you will have those opinions, but they do need to make reference to the particular degrees of belief you believe you will have in the future.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
655 (#39,899)

6 months
76 (#81,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Samuel Ruhmkorff
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (PhD)
Brian Kierland
Boise State University

Citations of this work

Fair Countable Lotteries and Reflection.Casper Storm Hansen - 2022 - Acta Analytica 37 (4):595-610.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Belief and the Will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (5):235–256.
Belief and the will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 235-256.
Stopping to Reflect.M. J. Schervish, T. Seidenfeld & J. B. Kadane - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy 101 (6):315-322.
The Cable Guy paradox.A. Hajek - 2005 - Analysis 65 (2):112-119.

Add more references