Mar mora biti pravica slepa? Izziv podob zakonu

Filozofski Vestnik 17 (2) (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Zavezane oči alegorije boginje Pravice v zgodnji modernosti so navadno razlagali kot znak novega poudarka sodniške nepristranskosti, ki je vodila do modernega kulta abstraktne norme v juridičnem pozitivizmu. V tem članku se sprašujemo, kakšna je bila cena zanikanja podob v očeh resnice. V njem proučujemo odgovore, ki jih nakazujejo dela Horkheimerja in Adorna, Derridaja ter nekaterih feminističnih teoretičark. Čeprav priznavamo argumentiranost njihovega nasprotovanja abstraktnim pojmom nepri-stranske pravice, v zaključku ponudimo nekatera opravičila za vsaj začasno ukinitev zmožnosti videti vidne razlike pri uveljavljanju zakona.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,626

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-19

Downloads
14 (#1,372,520)

6 months
1 (#1,601,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references