T-Height in Weakly O-Minimal Structures

Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):747 - 762 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given a weakly o-minimal theory T, the T-height of an element of a model of T is defined as a means of classifying the order of magnitude of the element. If T satisfies some easily met technical conditions, then this classification is coarse enough for a Wilkie-type inequality: given a set of elements of a model of T, each of which has a different T-height, the cardinality of this set is at most 1 plus the minimum cardinality of a set that generates the structure

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Isolated types in a weakly minimal set.Steven Buechler - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):543-547.
Locally finite weakly minimal theories.James Loveys - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 55 (2):153-203.
Hanf number of omitting type for simple first-order theories.Saharon Shelah - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):319-324.
The classification of small weakly minimal sets. II.Steven Buechler - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):625-635.
T-Convexity and Tame Extensions.Lou van den Dries & Adam H. Lewenberg - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):74 - 102.
T-convexity and Tame extensions.LouDen Dries & Adam H. Lewenberg - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):74 - 102.
Models of set theory with definable ordinals.Ali Enayat - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (3):363-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
52 (#437,458)

6 months
18 (#145,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Expansions of o-Minimal Structures by Iteration Sequences.Chris Miller & James Tyne - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):93-99.

Add more references