- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reading between the Lines: Direct‐to‐Consumer Advertising of Genetic Testing
Hastings Center Report 31 (3):33-35 (2001)
Abstract
A case study in the kinds of problems to expect from this increasingly popular marketing tactic.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Case Study: Genetic Testing in Assisted Reproduction.Cynthia E. Fruchtman & Caroline Lieber - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (6):11.
Bridging the Consumer‐Medical Divide: How to Regulate Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Testing.Kyle T. Edwards & Caroline J. Huang - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (3):17-19.
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and the Right to Know.Ronni Sandroff - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):24-25.
The Dangers of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease: Comment on “Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty”.Paul Lacaze, Jane Tiller & Joanne Ryan - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):585-587.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Multiplex genetic testing.C. W. Plows, R. M. Tenery, A. Hartford, D. Miller, L. J. Morse, H. Rakatansky, F. A. Riddick, V. Ruff, G. T. Wilkins & L. L. Emanuel - 1998 - Hastings Center Report 28 (4):15-21.
Multiplex Genetic Testing.American Medical Association The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
‘Just a Bit of Fun’: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?Heike Felzmann - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):20-32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
180 (#133,588)
6 months
3 (#1,470,822)
2013-11-22
Downloads
180 (#133,588)
6 months
3 (#1,470,822)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing.Greer Donley, Sara Chandros Hull & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (4):28-40.
Direct to confusion: Lessons learned from marketing brca testing.Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Prenatal genetic testing kits sold at your local pharmacy: Promoting autonomy or promoting confusion?Lucy Modra - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (5):254–263.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-ppxv8 uwo