Absorbing the Arrow of Electromagnetic Radiation

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 99 (C):10-27 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that the asymmetry between diverging and converging electromagnetic waves is just one of many asymmetries in observed phenomena that can be explained by a past hypothesis and statistical postulate (together assigning probabilities to different states of matter and field in the early universe). The arrow of electromagnetic radiation is thus absorbed into a broader account of temporal asymmetries in nature. We give an accessible introduction to the problem of explaining the arrow of radiation and compare our preferred strategy for explaining the arrow to three alternatives: (i) modifying the laws of electromagnetism by adding a radiation condition requiring that electromagnetic fields always be attributable to past sources, (ii) removing electromagnetic fields and having particles interact directly with one another through retarded action-at-a-distance, (iii) adopting the Wheeler-Feynman approach and having particles interact directly through half-retarded half-advanced action-at-a-distance. In addition to the asymmetry between diverging and converging waves, we also consider the related asymmetry of radiation reaction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

(Dis-)solving the puzzle of the arrow of radiation.Mathias Frisch - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):381-410.
Recent work on the arrow of radiation.Huw Price - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (3):498-527.
Experience and the Arrow.L. A. Paul - 2014 - In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Chance and Temporal Asymmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 175-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-26

Downloads
425 (#67,097)

6 months
125 (#43,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charles Sebens
California Institute of Technology
Mario Hubert
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After Physics.David Z. Albert - 2015 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Time and Chance.David Z. Albert - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Fundamental Nomic Vagueness.Eddy Keming Chen - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (1):1-49.
The logic of the past hypothesis.David Wallace - 2023 - In Barry Loewer, Brad Weslake & Eric B. Winsberg (eds.), The Probability Map of the Universe: Essays on David Albert’s _Time and Chance_. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 76-109.
Two accounts of laws and time.Barry Loewer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):115-137.

View all 49 references / Add more references