Building a Winning Team: The Development of Arguments in Criminal Cases

Abstract

When ‘making a case’ in court, the defense lawyer engages different arguments in a situated performance. At the same time, these arguments have developed over time in front of different audiences. In this paper I will follow the construction of arguments in an actual criminal case from preparation to the trial by focusing on the developments and refinements of the arguments that inform and shape the case.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
19 (#1,086,124)

6 months
12 (#312,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The recent development of informal logic.Ralph H. Johnson & J. Anthony Blair - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
Trial and Error – Failing and Learning in Criminal Proceedings.Kati Hannken-Illjes, Livia Holden, Alexander Kozin & Thomas Scheffer - 2006 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 20 (2):159-190.

Add more references