Can the Principle of Procreative Beneficence Justify the Non-Medical Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis?

Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 26 (5):180-184 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Principle of Procreative Beneficence formulated by Julian Savulescu and Guy Kahane states that the parents have a moral obligation to select the best possible child, when selection is possible, by means of the genetic screening of the embryos. Savulescu not only advocates the genetic screening in order to avoid the disease markers but also advocates for selecting the non-disease genetic traits of an embryo which might contribute to the child’s better future, e.g. the intelligence of the child or selecting a particular sex. In the paper, I put forward the question whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis is justified in the case of selecting the non-disease genetic markers. I explore the fundamental assumptions of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence as well as its moral foundation in order to understand Savulescu’s claim. I argue against the pro-selection view of Julian Savulescu exploring the basic assumptions and moral foundation of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. The Principle of Procreative Beneficence presumes that the non-medical and medical use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis are mutually inclusive in the question of a moral obligation for the parents. However, I identify that this is not the case if we consider the possible consequences of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis to the potential life of the child; the non-medical and medical use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis are mutually exclusive in terms of their implication on a child. The Principle of Procreative Beneficence also presumes a degree of parental obligation in the concept of ‘significant moral reason’ in the case of employing Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis which is morally problematic. Finally, I argue that the moral foundation of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence is based on the ‘common moral intuition’ which is not an authentic source of moral truth; hence, the Principle of Procreative Beneficence cannot justify the non-medical use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. When I was just a little girl I asked my mother, “What will I be? Will I be pretty; Will I be rich?” Here’s what she said to me “Que sera, sera Whatever will be, will be The future’s not ours to see Que sera, sera What will be, will be” [A popular song in the movie The Man Who Knew Too Much ]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,546

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-07

Downloads
4 (#1,815,609)

6 months
3 (#1,321,173)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references